Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Stolarczyk
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michael J. Stolarczyk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's not clear how this individual meets the criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The sources given mention him, but are not really about him, and I can't find multiple reliable sources that contain significant discussion of the subject. ... discospinster talk 01:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I think it could be deleted since the sources given don’t prove his notability, in fact I’m surprised it was accepted as an article in the first place. Regards, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 16:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 01:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 01:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – no claim to notability and I can't find sources to support WP:GNG. --bonadea contributions talk 06:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 03:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.