Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juelz Ventura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is neither PORNBIO or GNG are satisfied. Courcelles (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Juelz Ventura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guidelines along with WP:PORNBIO. Her scene awards do not satisfy the porn guidelines nor is the one music video appearance adequate. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Penthouse Pet, won of AVN Award (two times), ranked twenty third on Complex's "The Top 100 Hottest Porn Stars" 2011.... Subtropical-man talk
  (en-2) 16:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails GNG with no significant RS coverage. Fails PORNBIO. Award wins are scene-related and they don't count. Penthouse Pets are not inherently notable. Getting listed on one of Complex magazine's lists of top porn stars doesn't establish notability either. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Subtropical-man.--Hillary Scott`love (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator's accurate analysis. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I had just written: Delete per: Notability of pornographic actors and models. (Which, if it were evenly applied to porn actor/actress articles across Wikipedia, would eliminate a couple thousand less notable than this one.). But the article is maintaining 250-ish views a day. It's clearly notable to some set of Wikipedia readers. Prburley (talk) 19:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia doesn't have a couple of thousand porn star articles. At any rate, a house cleaning is in progress and other non-notable porn performers will be gotten to in due course. Finally, page views don't establish notability. Wikipedia is not a web host. • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not meet GNG as has not had significant coverage in independent secondary sources. Awards don't meet PORNBIO notability as they are scene based. Being a Penthouse Pet does not confer inherent notability nor does being on a list of 100 people on Complex. Number of hits on Wikipedia does not confer notability. Cowlibob (talk) 20:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 23:46, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as obviously Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 01:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.