Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungerball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 20:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hungerball

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and WP:Too soon Jimfbleak (talk) 06:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yellow Dingo (talk) 04:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 09:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. trivial coverage so far. DGG ( talk ) 22:54, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TOOSOON Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - has received some coverage but nothing major, right now it is a non-notable variation of football Spiderone 12:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 12:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.