- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert T | @ | C 01:34, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 11:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article is a hoax. Nothing on Google mentions "Hamus allis" mdd4696 16:54, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax bullshit. - Sensor 20:29, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hamus is NOT a genus of hamster. - Mgm|(talk) 23:26, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. Carioca 00:23, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sorry for all of those nonsense edits. I know that the author posted this as a joke. xetrov_znt 04:20, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoax. Highlighter-coloured hamsters. Yeah, right. Bearcat 09:47, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hoax. Native fluorescent hamsters in Canada????. Methinks that the author would be a member of the subfamily Cricetinae if we removed the "ic". Luigizanasi 01:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.