Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/François Asselineau (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Procedural nomination after an attempt to nominate by an IP editor. consensus - all comments keep, no objections (non-admin closure) Off2riorob (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- François Asselineau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An IP tried to renominate this but didn't finish the process. Notability is apparently still in question. Ten Pound Hammer and company • (Otters want attention) 21:58, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, if an unknown IP tries to delete this article, we have to go through this process again? I thought majority of Wikipedians reached an agreement ... 6 months ago. Why a single IP can re-question that consensus? Anyway, in addition to the 19 sources already used in the article, Mr Asselineau was aired on many radio and TV programs:
- BFM TV in "Les Experts de l'economie" (economics experts), 16 september 2011
- Africa n° 1 in "Le Grand Debat" (The great debate), 7 september 2011
- Beur-FM in "Forum Debat", 6 september 2011
- Africa n° 1 in " Le Grand Debat", 20 June 2011
- Radio Tropiques FM in "Midi Dix", 16 June 2011
- RCF, 10 June 2011
- Radio Notre Dame in "Le Grand temoin" (The great witness), 11 May 2011
- Yvelines Radio in "Tous en politique" (All in politics), 10 April 2011
- Generations 88.2 in "Ca fait debat" (it creates debate), 13 March 2011
- Choq FM in "L'autre monde" (The other world), 14 February 2011
- Divergence FM in "Provoscopie", 17 January 2011
- Keep Because of plenty of source, I do not think there is a need to go again for a deletion review.
--Lawren00 (talk) 23:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not this again. We already did an AfD that was then taken to DRV, which decided that it should be relisted at AfD again, which ended in a Keep decision. We really shouldn't have to go through this all over again. In addition to the sources listed above, just look at the article talk page, where all of the other sources are listed. Yes, I know, it got deleted on French Wikipedia. Their standards for politicians are higher than ours and Asselineau also appears to be a negatively politically charged figure in France, which potentially biased their decision. I'm not sure and i'm not making any accusations, but it is quite clear that he meets the requirements of a politician here, which we decided on last time. SilverserenC 04:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Numerous sources, many reliable, on the article's talk page here satisfy general notability guidelines. Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious Keep The last one was six months ago. There are ample sources found, including those listed on the talk page as Northamerica1000 pointed out. Dream Focus 01:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.