Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploratory Friday
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Exploratory Friday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No external sources or discernible value. The concept is only used within one school identified by the article, due to this, it seems heavily biased. If anywhere, it belongs as a sub category on the Highland Tech High article, however, with it's bias and lack of proper sourcing, it violates the Wikipedian Guidelines for articles. Xaldibik (talk) 09:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as clearly not encyclopedic. Speedy perhaps? Crafty (talk) 09:09, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no speedy criteria for this. Joe Chill (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well there should be. Crafty (talk) 15:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no speedy criteria for this. Joe Chill (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Fails to assert the reason for notability and does not provide WP:RS references. -- RUL3R*flaming | *vandalism 13:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Theleftorium 15:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- why football related discussions?--ClubOranjeT 23:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: A non-notable concept. Joe Chill (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as trivial non-notable concept under WP:N guidelines, and per WP:NOT#dictionary. Incidentally, called vocation day or job experience day or any of a multitude of other things at other schools, and while it may get shut down at that school, it has been going on for donkeys years around the world.--ClubOranjeT 23:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.