Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Brads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Brads (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO. His rubicks cube exploits were covered in the local media. Outside of that, there are primary sources that verify non notable achievement. John from Idegon (talk) 22:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - his accomplishments are worthy of applause but the coverage is entirely local. I'm not sure how that racks up against other, similar champions, but this guy seems to fail WP:42. I'm not going to link past disasters (to avoid WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and related drama) but this is the sort of article we usually delete. Bearian (talk) 21:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• KeepAtleast he had been recognised by awards won. Atleast be meets WP:GNG. Rocky 734 (talk) 01:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the above. This person is notable, therefore it should be improved but not deleted.WikiAviator (talk) 11:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment@Coolabahapple local coverage and lack of English content is not a reason for articles to be deleted. Those can also be RS.WikiAviator (talk) 11:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi WikiAviator, sorry but i have only added this afd to a couple of afd lists, that is all, you may be meaning to respond to someone else? Coolabahapple (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, multiple world records in a premier mind sport, backed up by reliable sources. Antrocent (♫♬) 18:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.