Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Puzak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Puzak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Virtually unsourced WP:BLP of a musician, whose only evident claim of notability is as a session performer on an album by another musician. This is not an automatic WP:NMUSIC pass for a musician, but he doesn't get over WP:GNG either as the only source here is a glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage of the other musician he sessioned for. Literally the only reason I'm not speedying this as an A7 is because it's been floating under the radar since 2005. Bearcat (talk) 23:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no coverage found to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO.  gongshow  talk  01:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 02:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Doesn't meet any of the criteria for WP:MUSICBIO.PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete that such a low quality article on such a clearly non-notable musician has existed for 12 years is very disturbing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.