Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Scott Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Scott Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Coverage appears to be limited to mere-mentions and interviews (generally in connection to his role in Isn't it Romantic), as well as their non-independent UCB profile. Going off of the content of the article, it's not clear that any of Jones's TV roles were particularly notable (although some of the shows were notable), and his appearances in film are limited to mostly minor roles, with the most significant ones being a supporting character in Isn't it Romantic and a role in Can You Ever Forgive Me? that was not significant enough to merit Jones's character's inclusion in the Wikipedia article's plot summary. Likely just WP:TOOSOON. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:10, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR.Germcrow (talk) 11:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage needed to meet WP:GNG and fails to meet any of the notability criteria at WP:NACTOR. Papaursa (talk) 21:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Undoubtedly fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. -- LACaliNYC✉ 20:28, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.