ShawnHill

Hello ShawnHill, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! You (Talk) 21:02, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

{{NoACEMM}}

Regarding your remarks made on the Talk page for Ronald20: Although his editing style can be quite frustrating, you should not have expressed your feelings in the way that you did. I suggest that you review Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks.

FYI: Ronald20 is a young editor who probably has some sort of learning difficulty, or maybe a behavioral problem such as OCD or Asperger's. Although editors with these conditions may cause problems on the Wikipedia, there are also other editors with the same conditions who are making valued contributions to the Wikipedia. Recently there have been a number of editors who are trying to improve the situation with Ronald20, and he does seem to doing better with his recent edits. If you still think that his editing is unacceptable, your next step would be to file a Request for comments on him. BlankVerse ∅ 04:31, 9 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

If that's truly the case, then my apologies to him. I think I remember glancing over a comment that this particular person has a learning disability. However, I feel that if each page is already edited to conform to a certain standard of quality, then he should leave well enough alone. The way I and maybe others see it, Ronald is doing these edits just for the sake of doing them. I can certainly appreicate if someone comes behind me and makes proper corrections to my contributions, but when someone else comes around and basically ruins the hard work you've accomplished, then there is some just cause to be frustrated. I can understand that he, and along with other editors, have made valuable contributions, but that's not the point. My point is simply is that I don't appreicate anymore ruining the work I take my valuable time of doing, nothing against him personally.--ShawnHill 18:03, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

The best way that I've found to deal with Ronald20's edits is to try to lead by example. For example, when I make a correction of one of his edits, I try not to just do a knee-jeck revert, but will also try to do some wikification, or add more info, or do some copy-editing. He does do good edits (besides the odd ones, like when he adds stub tags to large articles and removes them from small ones), and many of his good edits seem to be from following the examples of other editors.

You also need to be careful not to confuse the edits by Ronald20 (including the two sets of IP ranges that he also edits from as an anon) with some of the other anons that are also doing problematic edits to radio station and TV station articles. There is, for example, someone editing from AOL that is adding large amounts of confusingly written background history, even though the current info on the station may only be a couple of lines. BlankVerse ∅ 21:59, 9 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Nbcstudios2001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Fsn_west.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

• I apologize for editing your user page without leaving you a note explaining the edit. I was using AWB to automatically fix redirected wiki links. However, you may want to review Wikipedia:User page for the policy on this issue: "Pages in user space still do belong to the community", "Other users may edit pages in your user space", "It is considered polite to avoid substantially editing another's user page" (emphasis added). --taestell 19:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Fsn Houston.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, ShawnHill! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel 05:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Fox sports net west.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Fsn prime ticket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 03:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Fsn Southwest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 04:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, you did a great job creating the above mentioned template. I just had to re-create that template at {{Los Angeles Lakers}} to be consistent with other similar templates. Now, I'd like you, as a creator, to put "{{speedy}}" tag at {{Los Angeles Lakers franchise}}. We're not going to need two identical templates.--Crzycheetah 19:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nxt time you want to make one of these templates, just put ?redirect=no next to the template name. For example, if you want to make one for the Memphis Grizzlies, type in Template:Memphis Grizzlies, you'll see the roster, but in the address bar it will say Template:Memphis Grizzlies, you just need to add ?redirect=no and you'll get Template:Memphis Grizzlies?redirect=no, then hit the "enter" button. I hope it didn't sound complicated.--Crzycheetah 19:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Prospect Studios gate.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Prospect Studios gate.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:Staples101910(1).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:Staples101910(2).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 20:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, your last revision on your last article contains a duplicate link. For this reason, I have undone your last revision. When you click on a specific link, you must also add the title of the link as well the next time you edit. Watch the title of the article AND the URL very carefully, as I will keep watch of all edits in that article. CHAK 001 (talk) 20:32, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on KNBC. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. tedder (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your edit to restore individual coaches into the Lakers' navbox, there is a discussion to generally remove individual coaches from all NBA team boxes, and instead use a coaches specific navbox e.g. Template:Los Angeles Lakers coach navbox. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Basketball_Association#Head_coach-specific_navboxes if you wish to help build consensus on this subject.—Bagumba (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on The Arsenio Hall Show. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. DreamMcQueen (talk) 20:08, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

why not talk about it instead of edit-warring? I'm not just trying to thwart you, I'm trying to improve the article.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of former ABC television affiliates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KMSP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of former CBS television affiliates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WLNE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dan Fouts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Ray Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Los Angeles Memorial Sports Arena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Bradley (politician). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NBC Sports Live Extra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunday Night Football. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Clippers exec Gillian Zucker.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gillian Zucker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinton, New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Shawn, I know of an affiliate switch that's not included in the Wikipedia list. In the mid-1970s, KREM (TV) and KXLY-TV of Spokane, Washington switched ABC & CBS affiliates. I'm not good with tables and columns, and have been kind of busy lately. You should be able to find all the info. you need from their Wikipedia pages and a Google search. Thanks, SILUFND (talk) 05:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Diego Chargers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nick Hardwick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Detroit Tigers broadcasters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ON-TV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please initiate a discussion regarding the information you're attempting to add at Mork & Mindy rather than simply re-adding it once your change has been reverted, as discussed at WP:BRD. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding semi-protected edit requests to Template talk:30 for 30.
The template is not protected, as you know, because you are editing it, and you are not making a request, which would be pointless as you could edit it yourself.
Adding this template is, therefore just disruption/vandalism - Arjayay (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:30 for 30. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please read the documentation at WP:NAV#Properties for proper formatting of nav box templates. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LAClippers5.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 17:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

In your recent edit to PlayStation Vue, you added an table to show the packages. However, it appeared INVISIBLE. Can you start it all over again? 180.200.151.44 (talk) 20:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Update: It's been resolved (by me). 20:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.200.151.44 (talk)

Thanks...I had the damnest time trying to recify that, but the error may be caused by an older browser. Again, thanks! ShawnHill 21:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PlayStation Vue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KFMB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NBC Sports Live Extra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NBC Sports Live Extra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam9007 (talk) 22:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Media in Los Angeles, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Your info seems to be good, but where did you get it? We need some WP:Reliable sources. If you don't know how to the citations, just tell what they are on the Talk page and somebody will be along to insert them for you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Media in Los Angeles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please cite your sources, as mentioned above. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Howard Leeds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obit for non-notable individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 01:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Howard Leeds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Leeds until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 04:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Howard Leeds. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 19:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm trying to understand YOUR rationale on why this person isn't notable? Until you give me a compelling enough reason, I'm editing the article back --ShawnHill 19:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Howard Leeds, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howard Leeds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Queen and I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Milwaukee Bucks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 32.218.152.239 (talk) 23:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

My edit to KABC-TV was correct. WP:NOTDIRECTORY. We only need a list of NOTABLE on air staff. ACMEDeputy (talk) 13:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I honestly couldn't care less about the notable people list, whether it stays or not...argue with someone else about that. My main edit was to correct the year KABC-TV went on the air. ShawnHill 18:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

I reverted to the edit with the correct year but I reverted the on air staff to the last good edit before one other user added the full on air staff. I already told him about the WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTTVGUIDE. ACMEDeputy (talk) 21:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

You added unsourced material to the Dave Grusin entry. Is that correct?Vmavanti (talk) 19:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yep...it's correct. Search for it for yourself if you don't believe me. For some stupid reason, Wiki doesn't allow (or discourages) YouTube links, because there's where the real proof is. ShawnHill 21:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

No, I'm not going to search for it. I've got plenty to do. You understand that I have no qualms about deleting unsourced material. I'm sure you know that one of pillars of Wikipedia is to use sourced material with citations. As to your question about YouTube, there are many possible reasons why it's considered bad source. One, most of the material on YouTube is copyrighted or in violation of copyright. Two, anyone can contribute to YouTube, which means it relies on user-generated content.
–Vmavanti (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough, self-appointed moderator...I have plenty to do as well. At the end, it's not that big of a deal to me...just thought I add a little item to Grusin's page. ShawnHill 00:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced broadcast information material to the Jeopardy! broadcast information article. Your edits must be accompanied by WP:V sources. AldezD (talk) 11:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media in Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laff. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Vami IV. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Media in Los Angeles that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ♠Vami_IV†♠ 13:55, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sir, you should also consider changing the language of your userpage, as its vocabulary and tone are not collegiate and is in parts insulting. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 13:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I don't need any advice from you or anyone else around here as far as conducting myself. Since you're worried about my edit, I reverted back because I wrote plenty of information on that page, and some doofus from a made-up "task force" got some bug up his ass, plus some of his buddies decided to take it upon themselves to delete what I consider pertinent information. So yes, I got upset and rightfully so...I get that Wiki is suppose to be a "collaboration", blah, blah, blah. However, some of you exert whatever power you THINK you have over other editors...if we don't collaborate YOUR way, then you'll use your "power" to block or ban whomever you see fit, which is absolutely ridiculous. But my tone and vocabulary is insulting LMAO...man, please. GTFOH with that. ShawnHill (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't need any advice from you or anyone else around here as far as conducting myself clearly you do Shawn.. you really really do ~TNT (she/her • talk) 00:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

You're going teach me, Sam? (since you want to be a first-name basis) ShawnHill (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh fuck no 😂 ~TNT (she/her • talk) 05:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Per your user page, this edit summary and this comment - kindly don't bother to appeal, we don't want nor need you here. ~TNT (she/her • talk) 18:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

And:

• Special:Diff/952361563
• Special:Diff/761947436
• And your email to me which reads Since you want to take the route of blocking me, like a fucking coward (just like the last asshole that blocked me for no reason other being in his/her/they/whatever feelings), you and this fucking place can eat a bag of dicks. Have a nice day, you worthless cunt bitch :-) Fuck Wikipedia!

Are you okay? Please seek help. ~TNT (she/her • talk) 18:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm good...I stand by what I said. You check your condescending tone with someone else, you and that other coward GeneralNotability. I won't tolerate disrespect from anyone, and certainly not from the likes of you. ShawnHill (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

The likes of me? What likes are those Shawn? ~TNT (she/her • talk) 00:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

• I think we're done here. TPA revoked. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #49477, while both amusing and disturbing, has been closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply