SauliH

• Archive 1
• Archive 2
• Archive 3

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article James Hanson (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 10:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your recent edits to Arthur Gould (rugby player), any work on this (IMO) fascinating character of rugby is very much appreciated. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Stub articles are what they say, but-ends. They tell you the minimum, 'this person did that, from then until then'. Blair Swanell (for which I love the new infobox image) for example, is not a stub. It is probably a B class article, if not a 'Good' status article. He is a minor figure in sporting history, who is notable for nothing other than playing international rugby when international rugby was a minor sport. Therefore I think we have covered his life fairly well, and there are probably no books out there that cover his life in more detail than Wikipedia does. Therefore that is a good article, we have achieved the best we can. Take St Peulan's Church, Llanbeulan, which has recently been awarded GA status. It doesn't need to be Arthur Gould detail to hit the peaks. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

In fact, I've just put him up for GA status. I think he will pass. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hardly a balls up, your work is actually very insightful. I picked up your additions on Swannell's talk page, and will definitely follow them up. Those contemporary NZ newspaper articles are a fantastic resource. Cheers. FruitMonkey (talk) 07:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

A member of theWP:EAR team has addressed your enquiry at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#Articles that continually need to be updated. Do take the opportunity to follow any links that provide more information.--Kudpung (talk) 02:33, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please don't put empty blp parameters in WikiProjectBannerShell. |blp= must be set or not exist. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 18:42, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Better use {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=. At the moment you introduce double | in the template. Thanks and happy editing! -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Great work. Thanks, JNW (talk) 03:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Frank Row has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCopter^Radio_Checklist^{Formerly AirplanePro} 16:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

What a coincidence; I was just about to post that very warning template on that IP's talk page! Cheers dude. – PeeJay 21:30, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm a big fan of Rugby Relics and trust their work, but I'm not sure if it would be seen as a valid source. It makes sense, and we can still use the statement about him being a self promoter, as we don't know what he got up to in Urugauy, just his word. I think we should add it and reference it, and let others decide on its validity. Also, Moran in his book 'Viewless Winds' really does a hatchet job on Swannell, but I would like to either read the passage myself or at least have a page number to go by, and of course I don't own a copy.

Brilliant info you keep finding by the way. FruitMonkey (talk) 20:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think we should hold back on adding more info to Swannell at present as I feel it may damage the GA appeal. It would be best if we address the concerns raised, otherwise the reviewer could come back and begin reassessing on the points we have added since. Should be done in two days, and I think we are on task.

But I also agree with you on Swannell's character, I think he did all he said, but then never shut up about it. Though I find it hard to believe Moran's comments that he was a 'ladies man'. Bad hygiene, violent, boasts, that facial hair, loves mummy above all others ...strange. FruitMonkey (talk) 20:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations. GA status achieved, and to be honest I think you would be hard pushed to find a better article on the web or in a book on Swannell. Mission accomplished. FruitMonkey (talk) 21:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am aware of your work on the article, as it is one of my watched articles (having started it). I've put a few man hours into the article in the past, mainly through creating the British players on that tour. If you keep up the input you have entered so far, you could have another GA article on your hands soon. I've got another GA article on the hop at the moment (Norman Biggs), and I'm expecting Wales and David Watts Morgan to come to the boil soon so they will be taking my attention, but I would love to help out on the 1899 tour too. Of the characters on the 1899 tour captain Matthew Mullineux has to be one of my favourites. FruitMonkey (talk) 21:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I understand your concerns but this is an agreed concept across all wikisport projects. Have a look at football, they do the same, and its mentioned in their onfobox profiles too. Even Scrum.com uses the same system. The problem with only using it after a long period of time, is ...what is a long period of time. This can differ to a massive degree between sports, also we may then need to do it for clubs, after a long injury or just falling out of favour with the manager. The same reasons often keep a player our of a national team. FruitMonkey (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think it may be worth mentioning in the 1899 tour that the history books have incorrectly listed Martelli as a Dublin University player, when it is in all probability that he was a Dublin Wanderers player. FruitMonkey (talk) 21:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi SauliH. I was wondering how you were going on the above article. I would like to have a pretty decent article about this topic up by September as I am thinking the traffic might increase. How are you going on the sandboxed version? If you are too busy I can continue with it. AIRcorn (talk) 12:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

See here.

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on 11 Febrary 2013 with Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation.

More details can be found at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/7. I hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 02:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to you because your userpage (user:SauliH) says you are located in 'Queensland' without specifying which region of Queensland you are located in. Please add a more specific sub-category in order to be informed of what is happening in your region.)

Thanks for uploading File:Lonnie Spragg.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

More info here. I hope you can make it! (RSVP appreciated.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, in case you're not already aware of it, a group of Adelaide Wikipedians has been meeting on a monthly basis since April, with the aim of improving the scope and quality of articles on South Australian topics. We meet at UniSA's City West campus, and our 23 July meeting will have a guest speaker from the National Trust of SA.

This coming Sunday, 6 July, we will be holding our first Edit-a-thon. This will be an opportunity for new editors to come and learn either basic or more advanced editing from very experienced wikipedians, so if you know anyone who would like to get some practice, please let them know - and beginners will be very welcome. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 06:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article European Gemological Laboratory (USA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no 2ndary source fails GNG. Way short of NCORP. parent was deleted, so likely NN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 19:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Diamond color/Grading Table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry - Gemstones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry - Lapidary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry - Gemology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry - Jewelry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry - Business requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry - People requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry - Culture and Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I notice you have edited this page in the past: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worshipful_Company_of_Goldsmiths Its 'Livery Company' template info has been updated but the correct info isn't showing.

Thanks for your help.

(Yunzu19 (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC))Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Easts-rugby-brisbane-logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Template:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply