Rosalina523

Please do not delete properly sourced material or add your own unsourced assertions, as you did today at Cole Porter. See WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:VERIFIABLE. Tim riley (talk) 19:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Also see WP:OR. Rosalina523, if you have suggestions for the article, please open a discussion on the article's talk page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I overlooked your recent additions at first, as they were tucked away at the top of the page. (Talk pages by WP convention go chronologically from top to bottom, and I've moved the two paras, and left an interim comment. More tomorrow, which I hope is OK with you. Tim riley (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Message sent with Global message delivery.

I see you made an edit to the talk page for John S. Collins adding him to an Indiana project page. What connection does he have with Indiana? Also, whenever you make an edit please give an Edit Summary so people can easily see what you are doing. - GroveGuy (talk) 02:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

As best I can figure out, Collins made a one time deal with Fisher during the development of Miami Beach; $50,000 for 200 acres. Fisher was from Indiana, but Collins was from New Jersey. I don't think Collins had any connection to Indiana or any other dealings with Fisher. - GroveGuy (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rosalina523, so glad to see the IHS on Wikipedia at last. I have not been incredibly active over the last year, but want to welcome you to the community. I am the primary author of probably 75% of the Indiana History articles on Wikipedia. I have since 2004 been asking representative of the IHS to utilize Wikipedia to some extent. I would love to collaborate on writing on almost any topic of Hoosier History, or you input on anything I have wrote in the past. Most specifically, the article History of Indiana has been something I've had a long time goal of getting to featured status. It is very close I feel, primarily just needing some work on the state's more recent history.

At any rate, welcome to Wikipedia, and so glad to see another editor intersted in Indiana History. :) —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:49, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mostly all I have done lately is try to maintain the quality articles in the project. High quality articles gradually deteriorate over time unless they are tended to regularly. I was thinking about picking up on a article where I left off some time ago: Indianapolis Streetcar Strike of 1913. I have essentially, since about 2004, tried to start at the beginning of Indiana history and improve quality on the high importance articles. I have got up to the turn of the 19th century when I went into semi-retirement. I think a year long protest has been about enough though. :) Time to resume editing. —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 14:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

{{adminhelp}} I submitted an article from my sandbox on Harvey N. Middleton and didn't mean to. My sandbox page is now a redirect to Articles for Creation. I need some help in getting it back to a normal sandbox page. Rosalina523 (talk) 17:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have moved it back into your user space at User:Rosalina523/Harvey N. Middleton, and cleared User:Rosalina523/sandbox so that it is now a blank sandbox ready for anything else you want to put there. JohnCD (talk) 18:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. I've been working on Owenite communities and Fourierist associations lately and I've discovered that New Harmony is a bit of a mess (see my views on the talk page there). Do you have theoretical problems with shattering that piece into its constituent pieces? The Owenite Community element needs a makeover and the coverage of the extant town gets lost in all the history... There's definitely enough sourcing to do the Rappite community on its own terms as well. Drop me a line and let me know if you're interested. best, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 18:44, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I just want to notify there are some articles for reasessment on Wikipedia talk:GLAM/Indiana Historical Society. Most of the cases have now a rating by other projects, so it might be easy to reassess the noted articles, just to update the project.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

You have expressed interest in the GLAM-Wiki US Consortium, so you may be interested in attending the GLAM Boot Camp next month in Washington, DC. This is a training designed to help Wikipedians interested in guiding museums, libraries, and other cultural institutions in wiki engagement. Travel funding available for those in North America. Since the event is coming up soon, please be sure to add your name to the page if you are interested -- and please pass this announcement along. (You may want to share on Facebook or on Twitter.) Thanks for your interest! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

My apologies - here is the link for the GLAM Boot Camp mentioned above: Wikipedia:GLAM/Boot Camp. -Pete (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Greetings Rosalina523:

It appears you have participated in an editathon in the past. We are doing a mini research study involving past editathon participants to transform and improve Wikipedia. If this sounds like something quick you would want to do this summer, please sign up to our mini summer research program.

You can read more about our project here.

Together we can revolutionize Wikipedia!

Thanks & Cheers

Wiki crowdresearch (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm accumulating material for a planned article on English architect Percy Stone, who was active in London in the late 19th century. I noticed that Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (Indianapolis) states that Percy Stone, of London, England, received $500 for his second-prize entry. with Rose (1971) p.46 as the source. Do you happen to have access to that book at the moment? – If so, could you let me know whether there is any other information on that page about Stone? It seems likely that it was the same man, but I'm not quite sure yet! Thanks, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 12:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for your response. I'll see what else I can find out, but it looks like it could well be the same architect. He was certainly active here by that date. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 14:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Helen B. Schleman, Rosalina523!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You should rewrite to assert the person's notability first, then cover less important details like education. See MOS:LEAD for more.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 22:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

--Ipigott (talk) 10:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rosalina. Glad to see you've added your name to our mailing list. Hope you can continue to contribute more articles on women, especially in connection with our November contest.--Ipigott (talk) 21:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

--Ipigott (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Hi there, Rosalina. I've just been reading about your October editathon at Indiana University here. It looks as if it was very successful. If you are involved in any similar events in the future, perhaps you could keep us informed at Women in Red. We can then try to assist with follow-up and help any newcomers interested in writing or improving women's biographies.--Ipigott (talk) 11:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Sorry for writing in English. The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

--WMF Surveys (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize again for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed.Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you are not a native speaker of English, I apologize for writing in English. If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you!! --WMF Surveys (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I happened to notice your edit to List of women's club buildings (because i get notification because a long time ago i created the list-article i guess) adding The Propylaeum (John W. Schmidt House) there; I just added a bit to the latter article so that it at least mentions the topic. It would be great if you chose to add more.

I see also you've done a lot of improvement to Gene Stratton-Porter Cabin, i.e. in this combo diff. I only wish you were able to use inline citations which would automatically appear in a references list, rather than appending a whole list of references. The way you have done it, it is not possible for any other editor to know which information in the article is supported by which source, and it might be apprpriate for me or anyone else to tag it negatively with {{morefootnotes}}, which would display "This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)". It might be easy for you right now to know which paragraph or sentence was supported by which source, and to use inline citations, i.e. enclosing the reference by <ref></ref> and placing it right at the end of the paragraph or sentence. Also you can "name" a reference so that it can be invoked again, e.g. for

you could invoke that once,^[1] then invoke it again^[1] and again^[1] without writing it all out again (by simply <ref name=Bennett/>, and with it appearing in references section as:

You might think that it is being overly precise / too picky to try to identify which specific sentence is supported by which source, but it actually helps in a collaborative encyclopedia article which develops over a long time. Hope you don't mind my commenting; any which way I do appreciate your contributing. sincerely, --Doncram (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Actually i see i was wrong about my concern there, I didn't see u were using notes separately than the reference list, oops. Thanks anyhow! --Doncram (talk) 21:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you v. much for developing The Propylaeum article! I boldly went ahead and moved it, from its NRHP listing name which happened to be a mouthful, to simply "The Propylaeum", which seems to be its common name since it became the women's club a long time ago. --Doncram (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of Masonic buildings in the United States —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doncram (talk) 16:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, that message is from an automatic template. You actually edited at a different list of clubhouses. This merger vs. split proposal is about dividing by geography or by other status, for a list of clubhouses. Your participation would be welcome. --Doncram (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Powel Crosley Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Overbeck Sisters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glaze (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carl H. Eigenmann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Columbia

Rosa Smith Eigenmann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to German

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fixed! Rosalina523 (talk) 14:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carl H. Eigenmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fixed: Rosalina523 (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indiana Territory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kickapoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fixed Rosalina523 (talk) 13:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Kevin from WikiConference North America, here to discuss your proposal. I know this notice is coming to you fairly close to the conference, which I apologize for - unfortunately, any emails sent to your listed Indiana History email bounced, so I'm contacting you through here.

Your proposal has been accepted for WikiConference North America 2018, and is listed on our schedule for 2-3 PM on Saturday in Track 4 (Thompson 150B, 28 seats). Please let me know if whether are planning to attend the conference and will be presenting, and if the assigned time works for you. If you'd like to see any changes, just let me know. If you could confirm by Friday night, that would be much appreciated!

On another note, registration is also open through this link if you plan on attending.

Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Thanks for creating Addison C. Harris, Rosalina523!

Wikipedia editor Barkeep49 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your work on this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Barkeep49's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E. Howard Cadle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Brethren Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Removed disambin link Rosalina523 (talk) 16:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Rosalina523, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Elysia and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

• The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
• The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
• Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 00:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virginia Dill McCarty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Orr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

fixed! Rosalina523 (talk) 15:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, just thought I'd drop by and let you know that someone has started the review for the Good Article Nominee Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution! Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

RMaung (WMF) 16:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

RMaung (WMF) 20:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

I just finished updating the horrific article we had on Rosika Schwimmer and have started an article on the World Center for Women's Archives, which Beard ran for 5 years. When I went to Beard's article to see if there were any additional sources I could use, I was thrilled to see the recent improvements you have made to the article. I do not know if you are aware of the sister project to Women in Red, known as Women in Green, but I would love to see you nominate Beard for GA. One of our initiatives for this year in tandem with the WiR suffrage editathon is to nominate 20 articles on suffragists before the end of the year. I think that with all the work you have put into improving the article already, only a few citations in the death and legacy section would be needed. If you decide not to nominate it, I still think it is important to thank you and acknowledge your improvement of the article. SusunW (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Hi Elaine, I sent you an email a couple of weeks ago about a potential collaboration, and just wanted to note it here in case it got lost. Thanks! Dominic·t 18:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply