Rastko Pocesta

A tag has been placed on January 2010 month requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Momo san ^Gespräch 03:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

This "intellectual" is 12 years old.94.219.90.7 (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Hangman (poem). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. adding copyrighted text JoJan (talk) 18:38, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The User page states the following "Rastko Pocesta, a 12-year old intellectual, political scientist, human, political, civil and minority rights activist. Supports green politics and animal welfare. Social democrat and social liberal. Respects work of Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse and is inspired by Martin Luther King Jr.".

I'm sorry, but how exactly has it been determined that this person is an "intellectual"? Has he won any competitions in his home country? Created any significant work of art/science? Was he involved in any significant events during his (short) life? Judging from his comments on pages regarding Ph.D. Vojislav Kostunica and his Democratic Party of Serbia he is quite far from being able to give himself the title of "intellectual". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.86.146.11 (talk) 18:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

In what field, please?! Give me link to the "politics or human rights competition", and I bet i'll win it! Hey, man, I wrote a book and I was declared wunderkind, child prodigy, genius by the dutch, german and british newspapers, among the most important public persons in my home country called me intellectual! --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 18:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry, but your flawed arguments ("most important public persons in my home country called me intellectual" <-- who are you referring to?; "I was declared wunderkind, child prodigy, genius by the dutch, german and british newspapers," <-- gives further insight in your undeveloped understanding of regular sensationalism present in every day press;) your vandalism behavior (as suggested by a recent act of vandalism you committed on The Hangman page as well as a number of attempts to initiate an argument in talk pages regarding Ph.D. Vojislav Kostunica and Democratic Party of Serbia suggests that you are far from an intellectual, which is completely normal, since you're, as it seems, a 12 year old. Wikipedia does not exist for self-promotion or promotion of whatever kind of work you're pursing. This page does not belong here, because you are clearly not a person of any kind of significance whatsoever and are using this page to promote your agenda as well as to create tension on pages regarding any party that does not share your POV (as demonstrated by the links above).

Citations from the link above:

First link:

"WIKIPEDIA TURNS NATIONALIST!!!

Emotional speech?! The retard was lying, he was acting!!! Let's not lie even the readers of Wiki! He addressed a speech - it's enough - no place for the verb emotional! --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 00:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC)"

Second link:

Conservative?

The DPS is labeled as "conservative".

However, it was excluded from the articles conservative political parties and conservatism in Serbia (the Serbian Renewal Movement was also excluded), with the argument that "Democratic Party of Serbia is not a conservative but a nationalist center-right party".--81.84.199.19 00:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

"Are you ok idiots... DSS monarchistic?! And they are not conservative, but ultra - nationalist, they supported Karadzic and they were burning embassies all around the Belgrade. --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)"

[bolded and quoted are your very words, copied in their integral versions]

This post has, thus, demonstrated that you are far from what you consider yourself to be (overconfidence and holding yourself in high esteem is normal for a 12 year old and is a result of thier ambition to direct attention from others to themselves). I will not use this page for further arguments, as I regard Wikipedia as a source of knowledge, not a medium for arguments. Wikipedia is probably the last place you should go to if you're looking for attention. If you have (and it seems you clearly do) have those kinds of intentions, direct your browser to facebook or myspace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.86.146.11 (talk) 21:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are the last person which is deciding about what will be written on my user page. So, I will ignore your posts from now, and If you continue spamming my user page, I will be forced to report you and your IP address to the admins/mods. All the best, Rastko. --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 21:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

zdravo, imaš li malo vremena da porazgovaramo --Стефан Немањић (talk) 17:23, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pošto se prvi put dopisujemo, mislim da ti je red da ti se predstavim - ja sam Aleksa Lukić i potpuno sam suprotnih shvatanja od tebe. Možemo li malo da razgovaramo? --Aleksa Lukic (talk) 23:33, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pozdrav, Aleksa, ja sam uvek otvoren za razgovor. Izvni što moj odgovor ovoliko kasni :D --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 09:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please note that english should be used on Wikipedia. If that's not feasible, provide translation. --OpenFuture (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

ako si mi kasnije pročitao poruku, i misliš da se od tada nisam uključivao, i dalje sam tu. želeo bih malo da porazgovaramo. ako bi ti hteo. a reci mi samo, čuo sam da si napisao dve knjige. jedna je Hall of presidents, a druga se nikada nije iznela u javnosti. voleo bih da znam kako ti se zove druga knjiga, i gde mogu da je nabavim (i prvu gde mogu da nabavim) --Ћофи (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

napisao bih članak o tebi, ako hoćeš, kontaktiraj me --Filip Srbin (talk) 12:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to International response to the 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --OpenFuture (talk) 07:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

My friend, I am on Wikipedia since March 2009 and have a lot of experience on this field. I made many, many constructive edits on various languages in Wikipedia, and I am human rights activist in RL. However, I still don't get it, why Wikipedia shall have a limit on listing the full international response, which consists of the condolences, too. Thank you.--Rastko Pocesta (talk) 09:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

So why don't you read the discussions that has been about this, where multiple times the conclusion has been that there should *not* be a list of condolences? The arguments are there, and yet you just revert, multiple times. That you are a supposed genius and have been on Wikipedia for a long time is not arguments for you to break policy without arguments and engage in reverts even when you have gotten explanations. In fact, you should behave more responsibly and better because of these reasons. You claim to be an intellectual and have experience with Wikipedia. Good: Now show it.

But since you seem to not be interested in actually reading the arguments and engaging in discussion, here are the arguments against making the article into a condolence book: Condolences are expressed at a major accident isn't in itself WP:NOTABLE, nor WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC, etc. That list obviously is an example of WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of information. It would in fact be more notable if a country did *not* express their condolences. The only arguments for keeping them so far has been WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and arguments for making Wikipedia into a condolence book, which it isn't. And even the argument that other stuff exists is highly doubtful. Most other articles about international responses to events do *not* include long lists of condolences. See Mjroots list of examples: International response to Hurricane Katrina, Reactions to the September 11 attacks, Reaction to the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Humanitarian response to the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, Michael Jackson memorial service. It's probably WP:RECENTISM as well, as exactly who formulated their condolences in exactly what way definitely isn't anything anybody will be interested in in the future. And what about countries that are missing from that list? Did Andorra not send condolences? Bahrain? Uganda? Do we anywhere have a source for what countries sent condolences? If not, then this is suspiciously close to WP:OR. In short, there is no reason to keep it at all, and it breaks many of Wikipedias policies.

Does this make it clearer? --OpenFuture (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't say I am genius, nor I use my experience on Wikipedia as an argument, but it is fact that you don't have a consensus: I don't agree, because I think that it is Wikipedia's duty to collect as many informations as possible. List of condolences will only make the article better. --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 11:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, you are wrong, this is *not* Wikipedia's duty. In fact, policy explicitly explains that it is not. See WP:INDISCRIMINATE. If you want to change Wikipedia policy, start a process to do so. --OpenFuture (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rastko biću otvoren. Ti imaš 12 godina, ja imam 14 godina, i mogao bih reći da smo istih ambicija, ali različitih razmišljanja. Oduvek sam želeo da razmenim mišljenja sa tobom, i drago mi je da sam te upoznao. Ne mogu da verujem da stvarno pričam sa tobom. Zanima me sledeće:

• Gde mogu nabaviti tvoje knjige
• Kada ćeš držati promociju neke nove knjige
• Koja ti je najbliža politička partija u Srbiji (koja ima tvoja mišljenja)
• Da li misliš da su Srbi antički narod, ili su doseljeni varvari
• Zašto Kosovo treba da bude ne zavisno
• Zašto trebamo da uđemo u NATO i EU
• Zašto srpske devojke nisu naj lepše
• Zašto ćirilica nije naj lepše pismo
• Zašto Beograd nije najlepši grad

Ovo me zanima, čisto da razmenimo mišljnja. Podržavam te jer si mlad, ali ne podržavam tvoje stavove. Voleo bih kad porastemo, da se bavimo zajedno istim poslom, i da budemo zajedno, a ne da se svađamo. Piši mi na mojoj strani za razgovor, ovu koju ti sada ostavim, jer sam napravio novi nalog. Pozdrav —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filip knez (talk • contribs) 13:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

1. Moja prva i za sada jedina objavljena knjiga "Hall of presidents" nije u prodaji, to je moja odluka (nisam zadovoljan knjigom).

2. Ne uskoro. Verovatno u decembru/januaru.

3. Nisam istoričar, ne bavim se takvim temama.

4. Zato što nemamo drugde - ili ćemo sa Trećim svetom i represivnim tiranijama ili ćemo sa zapadnom civilizacijom, ali to je opet neki moj lični stav: nisam političar, već nezavisni aktivista za ljudska prava.

5. To je bio samo jedan deo mog inata protiv dogmi, fundamentalizma i tih večitih kompleksa: nijedne devojke nisu najlepše na Svetu, tu uopšte ne zavisi od nacionalnosti.

6. To nisam rekao i o tim stvarima se uopšte ne izjašnjavam.

7. Pročitaj tačku 5.

--Rastko Pocesta (talk) 12:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bravo. U suštini sam zadovoljan odgovorima kojima sam dobio. Ali opet imam nešto da pitam:

1. Ja sam čuo da si napisao Čovek koji nije preživeo holokaust, i na krstaricama sam pročitao odlomak. Nije loše
2. Želeo bih da budem obavešten kada ćeš imati promociju, da bih mogao da dođem, ako nije neki problem
3. Nisi istoričar, to je uredu, ja jesam, pa sam te onako pitao
4. ne sviđa mi se ovo, jer nas je NATO bombardovao 1999. i nisu nam potrebni. SFRJ je 1980. mogla na bojno polje da izvede 18 000 000 vojnika. A EU samo hoće da Kosovo bude nezavisno. Zašto ? Nemačka mora da zatvara svoje atomske baze, da im se ne bi dogodio novi Černobil. A na Kosovu se nalazi lignit, pa oni hoće da ga se domognu. Čim EU uzme lignit, oni će da ostave Albance u bedi. A Srbi i Albanci bi mogli da nađu zajednički jezik, kada se ne bi mešale EU, NATO i SAD.
5. za grad i devojke si upravu. Svako treba da voli svoje, bez obzira kakvo to bilo. To je hrišćanski.
6. nisi rekao za ćirilicu

Ovo što sam te pitao, i odgovore koje sam dobio, izuzetno sam zadovoljan. Imam još tri stvari:

• ,,ne zanima me naša „slavna” prošlost, zanima me naša BUDUĆNOST!¨, zašto ?
• voleo bih da dođen na neku tvoju promociju ili predavanje, pa bih voleo da budem obavešten. s toga me zanima, da li bi me obavesti ?
• da li u budućnosti želiš da se baviš politikom, ili ćeš biti samo aktivista za ljudska prava

i ovo ću da ti otkrijem. ja radim trenutno na jednoj knjizi pod nazivom Antička Srbija. Promocija će biti najverovatni u septembru. Znaj, kad bude, voleo bih da prisustvuješ. I molio bih te da mi pišeš na mojoj strani za razgovor. Svaka ti čast. --Filip knez (talk) 16:29, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

1. Nastavak je još bolji, ali ne i dovoljno dobar, zato knjiga nikada neće ni biti objavljena, to je odluka koju sam doneo pre koju nedelju.

1. Dakle, moji memoari su u pripremi i biće objavljeni u periodu novembar/decembar 2010, radi se o tome kako sam postao zainteresovan za politiku i dokumentuje sve događaje koji su obeležili slučaj "Pocesta", u Aprilu 2010. godine. Takođe obrađuje i ranija dešavanja, koja počinju negde krajem 2006. i završavaju se krajem prve nedelje Aprila 2010.

1. Nema veze, ja sam ateista :D

1. Jesam, rekao sam: "To nisam rekao i o tim stvarima se uopšte ne izjašnjavam." (tačka 6)

• Opet ti kažem: nisam istoričar. Oke, možda sam malo preterao sa tim "slavna", ali bio sam izuzetno besan nakon rasprave sa jednim nacional - šovinistom te večeri, zato sam i napisao slične stavke koji si citirao iznad.

• Da naravno da bih te obavestio, u koliko nisi u stanju da koristiš nasilje protiv neistomišljenika (u ovom slučaju mene). :D

• Ljudska prava i politika su dve neodvojive stvari, tako da i da neću, primoran sam da se bavim politikom, iako je za mene bavljenje politikom neopisivo zadovoljstvo :D

Hvala puno! Biću počastvovan da prisustvujem! :) --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 17:29, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

iako smo malo različitih mišljenja, smatram da se neistomišljenici trebaju poboriti argumentima a ne nasiljem. drago mi je da sam te upoznao. nadam se da ćemo ja i ti u buduće lepo sarađivati. ako nisi prezauzet, pa da se malo dopisujemo ovako preko vikipedije, šta misliš --Filip knez (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I meni je drago što smo se upoznali, ali Vikipedija je mnogo loša za propisku. Skype chat, Facebook, šta god, ali ne Vikipedija ;) --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 19:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. --OpenFuture (talk) 04:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

ne bih Skype, Facebook nemam, a ako se ti slažeš da se za sada dopisujemo na Vikipediji, pa kad smislimo bolji način, onda da ga i primenimo. Ako nemaš nekih drugih obaveza u toku dana, budi online na Vikipediji, pa mi pošalji neku poruku, ja sam stalno na Vikipediji, i po ceo dan sam na Internetu, jer skupljam podatke zbog moje knjige Antička Srbija. Kada bude promocija, obavestiću te, i nadam se da ćeš doći. Neće to biti skoro. Piši mi --Filip knez (talk) 11:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Da bar onda pređemo na srpsku Vikipediju, pošto će ovi da počnu da brišu komentare pošto nisu na engleskom :P --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 12:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

može, ali ja sam mislio da su te na srpskoj blokirali. ali važi, što da ne, javi mi se na srpskoj pošalji mi poruku, ime mi je isto. samo piši mi na mojoj strani za razgovor. --Filip knez (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

ovde sam, jesi li prešao na englesku --Filip knez (talk) 15:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ja ti kažem da će nas ovde blokirati i da trebamo preći kod braće Hrvata :P --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 15:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

hoćeš da pređemo na hrv. wiki ? --Filip knez (talk) 15:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pa mislim da bi to bilo ok, što ne? A o kakvom monologu priča onaj bolesnik Laszlo?! --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 15:41, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

slušaj, i ovi na hrvatskoj nisu sjajni. hajde da pređemo, ali onda ono što mi napišeš na srpskom prevedi u Google transliter pa mi pošalji poruku na hrvatskom. OK --Filip knez (talk) 15:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

poslao sam ti poruku na hrvatskoj wiki. čekam te --Filip knez (talk) 15:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

e blokirali me na hrvatskoj. rekao sam ti da su užasni. hajde ovde da pišemo na engleskom, prevodi u Google translate ako ti je lakše --Filip knez (talk) 15:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ovde te neće blokirati ;) --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

e hajde da se tu dopisujemo --Filip knez (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

e ali ne mogu da te nađem na toj --Filip knez (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

javi mi se na srpskoj vikipediji, imam ideju kako da se dopisujemo --Filip knez (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:Pocest.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

A discussion has begun about whether the article Rastko Pocesta, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rastko Pocesta until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. No such user (talk) 07:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

-- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 05:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are listed in the Category:Wikipedians interested in sociology, probably due to the use of "This user is interested in sociology" userbox, but you have not added yourself to our official member list for WikiProject Sociology. This prevents you from, among other things, receiving our sociology newsletter, as that member list acts as our newsletter mailing list (you can find the latest issue of our sociology newsletter here). If you'd like to receive the newsletter and help us figure out how many members we really have, please consider joining our WikiProject and adding yourself to our official member list. Thank you, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 13:18, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the interest in the project. You may want to move your signature from the inactive section :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please be advised of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:58, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please stop doing that. If you want to contribute to WikiPedia project, please do find a source that supports your edit or at least add a "citation needed" tag yourself with a short explanation on the article talk page. Thank you. BytEfLUSh | Talk! 23:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi RP. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

RachelWex 17:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list