Neveselbert
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
Pending changes reviewer granted
editHello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
Shinzo Abe
editThe short description for Grover Cleveland includes both his terms of office, so why can't the short description for Abe? WP:SHORTDESCRIPTION merely states that most descriptions are very short. There is no requirement that it can't be slightly longer to be specific. Векочел (talk) 20:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Векочел, sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I still think that's a bit too verbose, and I think the same of Cleveland's SD as well. I'll try to see if Abe's can be condensed somewhat, while keeping both terms. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- On second thought, having read WP:SDDATES, it recommends
Period in office most important
as the criterion, which can be interpreted as simply including the period in office "most important", which in Abe's case is his latter term. For a case like Cleveland, I would think his latter term would suffice as well, but I won't involve myself there. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
"Donald Trump as rhetorician" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Donald Trump as rhetorician has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 7 § Donald Trump as rhetorician until a consensus is reached. ZimZalaBim talk 02:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Please help
editI saw you uploaded this image from trumanlibrary.gov to Commons with a very detailed full caption. Can you tell me if the image in this link can be uploaded to Commons? If so, what is the exact image copyright tag? A similar example is the photo in this link, which was also uploaded to Commons with the copyright tag PD-USGov, but I'm not sure if this is correct or not. Thank you.CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 15:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi CalCoWSpiBudSu. I think that image should be fine over at Commons under
{{PD-US-1978-89}}
, but I would still advise double-checking with c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Best of luck, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)- Ok I got it, thanks. CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
edit- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
You say there is no exception for "Dame" listed at MOS:PREFIX. You seem to be missing The honorific titles Sir, Dame, Lord and Lady are included in the initial reference and infobox heading for the subject of a biographical article, but are optional after that. The title is placed in bold in the first use of the name
! -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Necrothesp. That's open to interpretation, and I would argue
|honorific_prefix=
can be considered part of the infobox heading. I'm inclined to interpret it that way. Thanks! ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)- However, it makes absolutely no sense for the title to be bolded in the first line but not in the infobox! It looks utterly weird. That's my opinion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not necessarily, since "Dame" isn't a part of the article's title, either. I'm of the opinion that the
|name=
should match the title. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not necessarily, since "Dame" isn't a part of the article's title, either. I'm of the opinion that the
- However, it makes absolutely no sense for the title to be bolded in the first line but not in the infobox! It looks utterly weird. That's my opinion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
editHello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
Important: Please update user script installation
editHi there, you currently have a user script installed from Anne drew Andrew and Drew
. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to Anne drew
, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.
To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (Special:MyPage/common.js or Special:MyPage/skin.js) by replacing all instances of Anne drew Andrew and Drew
with Anne drew
.
If any of this is unclear, please ping Anne drew for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!
Thanks – Anne drew
You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)