My Cat inn

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 14 November 2024 T 21:50 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

Hello! Thank you for participating in Round Two of the Wikipedia:Mind Benders! The round will officially close on Friday, September 16, and round three (which is complete) will be open in the immediate days after that. A notice will be sent to you at least 48 hours before round three is set to open, to insure fairness. Round three offers 11 new exciting questions, this time written by Deryck C.. Please be sure to join in the fun! Also, congratulations to Riffsyphon1024 for winning our logo competition! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 22:22, 15 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hello, My Cat inn! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hello, My Cat inn! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hello, My Cat inn! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Round four of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Thursday, December 1. This round will be drastically different from round three; part one will consist of a creative project, and part two will be developed from there. The full details will be released when the round opens. Time and speed should not be major factors in this round; thus, there is no exact opening time for the round as speed will not factor into the scoring. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Please add Wikipedia:Mind Benders/to do to your watchlist to receive further announcements; the NotificationBot is currently down and all notifications will be placed on that page. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy. If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. Special thanks to Fetofs for helping distribute this message.

{{unblock}}

• Unblock request: my IP got blocked. can you lift the block? this my ip 69.116.4.226. my comment: it is good that i can still edit my talk page **My Cat inn @ (talk)** 23:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Neither your account[1] nor the IP address specified[2] have been blocked. If you get the MediaWiki:Blockedtext message when you attempt to edit, please copy and paste the IP address, blocking administrator, and reason to this page. This will help the reviewing administrator find out why you're blocked. // Pathoschild 12:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Sarly I am allredy unblocked it was a 24 hour block of my IP it is ok now.**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 19:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

A non-expert is again requesting deletion of the article. [3] Your vote would be appreciated. Prof. Afshar 18:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have deleted this RfA, as it is a mockery of the process. Ip addresses are not given administrator access, and nominating one is disruption of an already shaky process. Do not do this again. Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 23:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Don't feel bad (Although I didn't get to see it). It sounded amusing from the description and I've had threats from other people that they'd do the same. 68.39.174.238 04:02, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I've been meaning to sort this with Grutness for a while! Joe D (t) 02:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

stop re-adding and removing notices from Cool Cat's RFA. It was closed because Cool Cat withdrew. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 01:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding the Adolf Hitler article to AFD. Being a "bad man" is not grounds for deletion; this person's notability (and infamy) is unquestionable. Please refer to WP:BIO for more information on our inclusion criteria for biographical articles. Thanks! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Indeed. If you do not relent, it will be treated as vandalism and dealt with as such. --Nlu (talk) 05:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

It was a test afd I know it wrold be keep I dod not want to do it to a aricle cerd be deleted.**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 06:04, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please don't do that. If you're going to "experiment" with AfDs, pick an article that actually should be deleted, at least in your opinion. See WP:POINT. --Nlu (talk) 06:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I also wanted to thank you for your thoughtful AfD nomination. I find it so clever when editors try their hand at alternative tasks like wiki humour... I mean, like, anything to avoid writing a frickin' article, huh? Please don't do that again. Thanks :) Wyss 06:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Could you please state your rationale for removing the images from the Penis article? Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors (see WP:NOT), and you did not discuss the removal of the images on the article talk page.--Alhutch 03:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I fell that porn dous not belong in an encyclopedia. The page still haves a photalgraph of a humen penis on it.**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 03:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

• Hello. This page was semi-automatically modified to sort links to my user page in a meaningful way. Sorry, no other new message. :) // Pathoschild (_admin / ^talk) 04:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Dear My Cat inn, I wish to ban Danko Georgiev from Wikipedia for his repeated accusations of Fraud to me regarding my experiment [4] on the talk pages. My experimental results were verified by faculty from Harvard and other schools. I will not allow this idiot to ruin my reputation. He must be repudiated by the Wikipedia community. Any help you can offer in this regard would be appreciated.-- Afshar 06:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I apologise for placing that warning template on your talk page. I was RC patroling and I thought I saw you make a vandal edit, but I checked you contributions and I was obviously mistaken.--Conrad Devonshire ^Talk 00:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have an answer to your question about editing talk pages while autoblocked. I did an experiment by creating a bad name account and found out that you can only edit your own talk page when autoblocked.

I reverted your edit to Wikipedia because the spelling was weird and I didn't think the wording was any improvement. I hope you don't mind. Bishonen | talk 01:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC).Reply

it ok that is Wikipedia It sume one dus not like my edit it ok to RV it.**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 02:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you changed the time before vandalism will get reverted in the wikipedia article. I was thinking of putting a similar one for the George W. Bush page, but I don't know if admins would enforce it. Do you have any idea how the current one got on the wikipedia article?--Kchase02 T 05:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, I thank the wikipedia article got vandaled so meny times some one purt it on the article.**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 16:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

You like my jokes on the page?Gnrlotto

From your user page:

"This user is a native speaker of English."

If you're not native, then I apologise, but if so, what's up with your spelling and grammar? It really hurts to read, and if you're native... I just don't get it. User:127001/sig 12:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• Dear My Cat inn, --Michael C. Price insists on using unsubstantiated claims without proper references on the article page. Regardless of the nature of his claims, I have requested that he does so, but instead he has produced at best irrelevant quotes from non-peer-reviewed sources. His edit follows:

Though Afshar's work is still the subject of ongoing interpretation and discussion, a significant portion of the scientific community is of the opinion that Afshar's experiment does not refute complementarity.

Some general criticisms are:

Bohr's philosophical views on the Complementarity Principle are generally seen in accordance with the Schrodinger wave equation. Since the latter is obeyed in Afshar's experiment it is not obvious how complementarity can be violated.^[1][2]

The modern understanding of quantum decoherence and its destruction of quantum interference provides a mechanism for understanding the appearance of wavefunction collapse and the transition from quantum to classical. As such there is no need, in the decoherence view, for an a priori introduction of a classical-quantum divide as enshrined by complementarity. Any experiment that claims to violate complementarity needs to address this issue.

As Michael claims, those statments are supposedly "popular views" that preexisted my experiment, and as such must be present in peer-reviewed publication predating my work. All I have asked him to do is to provide such valid ref.s but he has persistently avoided doing so and instead engaged in personal attacks. He seems to have a lot of time on his hands to be on Wikipeida constatntly, but I don't. This is turning to oneupmanship, and I don't have time for such antcis. Maybe he would heed your request. Thanks!-- Prof. Afshar 13:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

P.S. I will be discussing this issue with Michael Price on the article talk page, and would highly appreciate if you could monitor our discussion and interject when you deem fit. I'm afraid it might get a little testy, as Michael has been persistent on personal attacks. Thanks very much for your help. Best regards.-- Prof. Afshar 17:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Per the terms of the German userbox solution new userboxes should not be created in template space. Please read up on the current practices. That page has instructions on how to properly create userfied userboxes.

And I hate to be cruel, but just because you're dyslexic doesn't mean you can't use a spellchecker or something. If your contributions consistently decrease the quality of articles by introducing spelling errors and such we may have a problem. --Cyde Weys 20:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your comments and support over at mfd/Denver 2008. If you need anything, let me know. See ya' around. Editor19841 (talk) 00:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on AOLSafetyBot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Caerwine Caer’s whines 21:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article AOLSafetyBot, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Caerwine Caer’s whines 04:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello My Cat inn, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:This Old House logo.png) was found at the following location: User:My Cat inn/contribution arcive. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you are listed to help people in designing their user pages.

Well, I need help with a similar type of thing - graphics editing.

I'm preparing to coordinate this:

and for it I'm developing some awards. Each award will include an image, and that's where I need help...

I've got to have all the awards done by July 15th, and I don't even have the first one finished yet.

I'm looking for someone who knows how (or is interested in jumping in and learning how) to work on images in xcf format using GIMP, or Inkscape, etc. (Because I and others will need to be able to edit each image's layers after you are done with it).

If this sounds like something you are interested in helping with, please drop me a note.

By the way, both GIMP and Inkscape are free, making it easy to get started from scratch.

I look forward to your reply.

The Transhumanist 12:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Unencyclopedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 20:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply