PROFILE  ·   DISCUSSION  ·   RECENT EDITS  ·   RL ARTICLES CREATED  ·   RL ARTICLES 2  ·   RL ARTICLES 3  ·   RL ARTICLES 4  ·   RU ARTICLES CREATED  ·   RU ARTICLES 2  ·   TEMPLATES CREATED  ·  

being BLOCKED is not the same as retiring

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Londo06! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 14 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Ashley Gibson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Brent Grose - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Mark Field (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Ricky Bibey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Josh Miller (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Tom Haberecht - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Ryan Boyle (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Matty Blythe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Richard Eyres - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Asa Amone - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA reassessment of Melbourne Storm

edit

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Melbourne Storm/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Keiran Hyde

edit

Can you explain to me what use this link here is in 6 to 8 weeks it will be obsolete, so why is it in the external links section? Mo ainm~Talk 17:17, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

WTF

edit

I take it I was never meant to remain unblocked, as I am damn sure no-one else has used my internet connection.Londo06 20:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Harlequins RL

edit

 Template:Harlequins RL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jameboy (talk) 09:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wrong

edit

I think this user has only one sockpuppet: lando09. His other socks don't appear to have similar names. Most sockpuppets I have seen have names similar to the origanal acount, suh as the case of Larry Jefferson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eteledcomputerapple (talkcontribs) 13:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

edit
 




To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Stefan Hughes

edit
 

The article Stefan Hughes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No in-depth coverage available of this person. Fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 12:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Featherstone RUFC

edit

Hi, I notice that you have made contributions to the Featherstone article. The current rugby league club, Featherstone Rovers, wasn't founded until 1902, and appears to have no links to the earlier rugby union (RU) club. However, I have contributed to an article about James "Jimmy" Metcalfe, and I have found details of him playing for Yorkshire (RU) in 1896/7 while playing at Featherstone (RU), would you have any information about the RU club of the 1800s in Featherstone. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:London Skolars rugby league players

edit

Category:London Skolars rugby league players, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 14:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

edit
 

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Roger Best for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

edit
 

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

edit
 

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lucas Miller (rugby league)

edit
 

The article Lucas Miller (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:RLN as hasn't played first grade

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 08:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Navbox RL squad

edit

 Template:Navbox RL squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. WOSlinker (talk) 19:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Military Historian of the Year

edit

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Southern

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul Southern requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JC · Xbox · Talk · Contributions 00:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Harlequins Rugby League players

edit

Category:Harlequins Rugby League players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. J Mo 101 (talk) 19:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cy Lasscock

edit
 

The article Cy Lasscock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:RLN as he never played in the NRL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tevita Pangai

edit
 

The article Tevita Pangai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player who fails WP:RLN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tevita Pangai for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tevita Pangai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tevita Pangai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 14:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

List of St Helens RLFC players

edit

Hi @Londo06: I looked at List of St Helens RLFC players and wandered what all the "Y"s and "N"s were. I see you're semi-retired but thought you might be able to tell me what they mean before I do some work on the article. Jodosma (talk) 11:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Harlequins Rugby League Reserves and Academy

edit
 

The article Harlequins Rugby League Reserves and Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long out of date page with questionable notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Australian rugby league biography, 1990s birth stubs has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Australian rugby league biography, 1990s birth stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~ Rob13Talk 17:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daley Williams

edit
 

The article Daley Williams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

appears to fail WP:RLN and the GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 11:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Netani Suka

edit
 

The article Netani Suka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

appears to fail WP:RLN and GNG as did not play for Fiji in the RLWC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 11:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Malakai Yalimaiwai Tuiloa

edit
 

The article Malakai Yalimaiwai Tuiloa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

appears to fail WP:RLN and GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 11:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mike Baxter (rugby union)

edit
 

The article Mike Baxter (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 17:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Londo06/Noq

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Londo06/Noq, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  06:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of James Inglis (rugby union)

edit
 

The article James Inglis (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 13:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Richard Lopag

edit
 

The article Richard Lopag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:RLN and WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Richard Lopag for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Lopag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Lopag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

J Mo 101 (talk) 21:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ross Barbour (rugby league)

edit
 

The article Ross Barbour (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:RLN. Article claims he played for Ireland, but there is no evidence of this on RL Project or RKC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lyndon Bateman

edit
 

The article Lyndon Bateman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rugby player, fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Frank Wagenstroom

edit
 

The article Frank Wagenstroom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am not seeing any indication that this player meets either WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG; no significant coverage outside of stats and hiring announcements as would be expected of a popular sport.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Primefac (talk) 13:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jonny Kennedy (rugby union)

edit
 

The article Jonny Kennedy (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player, even by the somewhat more lax standards of the old WP:NSPORT (and definitely not by the new). Not seeing any significant coverage other than a few things about his vitamin company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ryan Prosser

edit
 

The article Ryan Prosser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rugby player, does not appear to meet either WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG; only coverage other than stats pages are signing announcements.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dave Hull (rugby league)

edit
 

The article Dave Hull (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player who fails WP:SPORTBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Steve Jones (rugby union, born 1983)

edit
 

The article Steve Jones (rugby union, born 1983) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rugby player. He has a very common name but I cannot find any content about him other than generic match reports (his hat trick with Scotland A is only covered in summaries for example). Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Aaron Trinder

edit
 

The article Aaron Trinder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable rugby league player. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tosh Masson for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tosh Masson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tosh Masson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 18:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Iain Grieve for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iain Grieve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iain Grieve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Iain Grieve

edit

  Hello, Londo06. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iain Grieve, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Anthony Armour

edit
 

The article Anthony Armour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. No significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Enrico Patrizio for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enrico Patrizio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrico Patrizio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 16:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply