User talk:Kencf0618/Archive 3

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Stop with the firehose of basic geography errors

That EXIF is nowhere near Chelsea. It's nowhere near City Hall. It's nowhere near the Brooklyn Bridge. It's nowhere near Brooklyn Heights. It's nowhere near Long Island. Long Island is nowhere near Chelsea. The Brooklyn Bridge is not in the pic and not cause anything's in the way cause it's out of frame.

The white is not the smoke, it's clouds, the dirty color is the smoke. So the caption was right till your change.

The H&M signs are very far from Fifth Avenue, they're like halfway across the photo from Fifth Avenue. The flagship isn't even near the one near the signs or the H&M on Fifth Avenue.

"fixed my own egregious geographical error" did not. Brooklyn Heights is in the pic, not where it was taken. That EXIF is an entire wide river away from Brooklyn Heights.

The East River is not 0.5 miles from 30 Rock, it's not 2.3 miles away it's 1 mile away, and it's over 90 degrees from where the camera's pointing and on a clear day only a small unimportant part of the picture over 3 miles away would be East River. Why even mention it?. It's not really southeast of the camera either, more like east (Manhattan directions are 28.9 degrees clockwise of normal cause the grid aligns with the rivers not the north pole)

Yes it's only part of Midtown, 30 Rock is close to the middle of Midtown, huge parts of Midtown are out of frame, almost half its tall buildings aren't even within 90 degrees of where the camera pointed, Midtown's tallest building is well over 100 degrees away from where the camera pointed, even directly behind the camera is still Midtown till about half mile away, Empire State Building is not 1.3 miles from the camera, it's 0.8 miles, Lower Manhattan is not severely obscured it's completely obscured or maybe close enough that someone who doesn't even know the Empire is downtown of the camera could never know (Lower Manhattan skyscrapers are over 3 miles away, 14th Street is 1.75+ miles from the camera (is Union Square even visible?) and buildings 1.3 miles away are already barely visible while the Empire at 0.8 miles is much more visible than the 1.2 and 1.3 mile buildings (if half the light gets through x meters then 10x meters is 1/1,024th the light, not 1/10th). And finally the 30 Rock file HAS NO EXIF. WHERE DID ALL THE BULLCRAP COME FROM? HOW CAN SOMEONE GET FOUR DIFFERENT WRONG ANSWERS FROM GOOGLING THE SAME EXIF COORDINATE?. IT'S NOT CITY HALL, THE LINE PARALLEL TO THAT PIER AXIS DOESN'T GO ANYWHERE NEAR CITY HALL Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 09:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Calm down. Take it to Talk. Regards. kencf0618 (talk) 17:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Hoaxes

Please do not post hoaxes as you did with this edit. The reference you quoted is for an entirely different building not even remotely close to being 10 Rockerfeller. Canterbury Tail talk 02:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

I goofed. NYC buildings all look the same to me. kencf0618 (talk) 03:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Please do not try and perform original research on buildings and photos to try and figure out what they are, use only what sources reliably and explicitly say. Canterbury Tail talk 14:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
That's what addresses, latitudes, and longitudes are for. kencf0618 (talk) 14:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maryam Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

Help me! K to ℃ conversion standard, if any.

Please help me with... I had just begun using the K to ℃ conversion template on History of superconductivity when I realized that whilst ℃ was initially either parenthetical or absent, the rest of the article seemed to be exclusively in K. Is there a Wikipedia policy for this? It would, or should, cover much scientific ground! kencf0618 (talk) kencf0618 (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

While K seems like the right temperature scale to use when discussing superconductivity, I see no reason why you could not provide a parenthetical conversion to °C for each mention, if you think that will help readers understand. On the other hand, providing a parenthetical °F conversion for every instance would seem to me to be overkill. But the {{help me}} helpers are not the ones to ask this question of. It would be better to ask on the talk page of the article. If that doesn't draw any attention, try asking at the talk page of one of the WikiProjects whose banners are on Talk:History of superconductivity. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Shall do. It seems to be a matter of stylistic preference, really. kencf0618 (talk) 02:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

Nomination of Moxila A. Upadhyaya for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moxila A. Upadhyaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moxila A. Upadhyaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sandstein 11:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Texas fireball

 

The article Texas fireball has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources for typical meteorite

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 13:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Baltic Incident

 

The article Baltic Incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NEVENT/WP:NOTNEWS, no lasting significance or duration of coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 13:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Syracuse meteor

 

The article Syracuse meteor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meteor explosions are somewhat routine events – no indication of lasting notability, just fleeting news of the explosion so fails WP:NEVENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 14:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Young Americans Against Socialism

 

The article Young Americans Against Socialism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with multiple independent substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Time Travelers (1964 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

"Invest 98L" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Invest 98L has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 17 § Invest 98L until a consensus is reached. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Integrated Surface Database

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Integrated Surface Database, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Teri Kanefield

Please do not add categories which are not supported by sourced text in the article. Thanks. PamD 19:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the October 2023 Gaza–Israel conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Instance (computer science), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Instantiation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pubic hair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Escutcheon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Timeline of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Timeline of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shahid Motahari University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Echelon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bachelor pad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:鬼殺隊「柱」.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:鬼殺隊「柱」.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:鬼殺隊「柱」.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:鬼殺隊「柱」.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Timeline of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war
added links pointing to 39th Division, Evergreen Line and 99th Division
Ecchi
added a link pointing to Trope

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:InfectedMolar0969.jpg

 

The file File:InfectedMolar0969.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:IndianHeadTestCardComputerWallpaper0265.jpg

 

The file File:IndianHeadTestCardComputerWallpaper0265.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal file. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:IndianHeadTestCardComputerWallpaper0308.jpg

 

The file File:IndianHeadTestCardComputerWallpaper0308.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal file. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Timeline of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war
added a link pointing to 39th Division
UNIVAC I
added a link pointing to Filament

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Unity Explorer

Just a word of explanation. When considering red links I try to follow the guidance at WP:REDLINK. No doubt the ship was attacked, which is indeed notable enough for it to feature in the "Houthi involvement" article, though I doubt it would meet WP:Notability requirements for a stand-alone article; its notability at present is limited to the content in this article. Hwever for the shell company that does nothing except own the ship as an asset on behalf the beneficial owners, and charter or subcontract it to a ship operator or manager, it is very difficult to see how it could ever be notable in its own right, bearing in mind the specific guidance at WP:NCORP. What do you think? - Davidships (talk) 17:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

My primary concern here is to parse "Israeli-linked", and as this writing no one (whom we know of who edits Wikipedia, anyway) knows why Number Nine was attacked. In a world of mega-fleets with many ships with fanciful names, she's definitely an outlier. As a WP:Eventualist in good standing I've linked her, Unity Explorer, and Sophie II just in case salient information becomes available. As things stand now, The Economist has noted that the more recent attacks have been apparently random. kencf0618 (talk) kencf0618 (talk) 13:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

Nomination of Peacock Game for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peacock Game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peacock Game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Esolo5002 (talk) 04:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome! It's always a great feeling to see another experienced WikiGnomer chipping in the drive. Apart from looking at the instruction page which has tip to find articles that are uncited, I think that's it. I wish you good luck for the drive; you'll need it. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kid Acero, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Accent and Mook.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

 

Hello Kencf0618!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

About Creating a New Article from Spanish to English

Hello, a new page needs to be opened in the English Wikipedia from the Spanish Wikipedia. Can you please create a page that is active on Spanish Wikipedia? I present the source below https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capture_Bizarre Splendid33 (talk) 14:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

No hablo español. kencf0618 (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Dolphy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big break.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

 

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Kencf0618 for collecting more than 25 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

More care, please

You duplicated the article content here, and here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

I've just undone the same. I don't know what you're aiming to achieve, Kencf0618, but please ask on the article's talk page if you need assistance. MIDI (talk) 10:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Trenchant information flow fu. kencf0618 (talk) 11:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 

The article The Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 23:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Global Metal Apocalypse

 

The article Global Metal Apocalypse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 23:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hot Rolled Mild Steel Plates, Sheets and Strip

 

The article Hot Rolled Mild Steel Plates, Sheets and Strip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources for specific standard

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 00:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cold Rolled Carbon Steel Sheets and Strip

 

The article Cold Rolled Carbon Steel Sheets and Strip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources for specific standard

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 00:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

 

Hi Kencf0618. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
  • Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. – Joe (talk) 08:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Global Metal Apocalypse for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Metal Apocalypse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Metal Apocalypse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92Talk 14:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of The Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92Talk 14:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Kencf0618,

 
New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

 

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

Proposed deletion of List of CISSP holders with Wikipedia articles

 

The article List of CISSP holders with Wikipedia articles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Intersection of two non-notable characteristics (having the certificate, and having a Wikipedia article). Fails WP:LISTN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hi Kencf0618. I've removed the autopatrolled right from your account, which means that articles you create will again be reviewed by new pages patrol. I did this first because I noticed some sourcing problems in your recent creation Zoroub Hill and then, reviewing your creation log, noticed that a high proportion have been deleted (22.8%) or unreviewed by other reviewers/admins (courtesy ping @Pppery:). I'm sorry to do this and hope it will not discourage you from creating further articles; it doesn't mean that you've done anything wrong, just that I think your creations would benefit from a second pair of eyes, as is the case for the vast majority of other editors (including myself!). – Joe (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

I've no issues with this –I appreciate my work being put through a finer sieve! kencf0618 (talk) 14:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

Aeronautics

Hi Ken. On 27 July you edited Aeronautics to insert the words “by extension” into the first sentence in the lead. You added two words but I don’t believe these words add any extra meaning, or aid readers in understanding the subject. I think these two words are redundant so I will remove them.

Wikipedia encourages Users to maintain lead sentences that provide an introduction to the widest possible audience. Plain English is encouraged. Please have a look at MOS:LEADSENTENCE.

WP:Make technical articles understandable is also relevant to a technical subject such as Aeronautics.

If you disagree with anything I have written here, please raise the matter for broad discussion at Talk:Aeronautics. Dolphin (t) 08:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Nyarch Linux

Hello Kencf0618, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nyarch Linux, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyarch Linux.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Miminity}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

Barnstar

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for creating the timeline of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, which, as you envisioned, has since significantly grown and had many of its events pinpointed to the respective seconds at which they happened. The timeline is a valuable addition to its article. –Gluonz talk contribs 21:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! kencf0618 (talk) 02:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

Campaign Sidekick

Hi!
I am genuinely surprised at your creation of the article Campaign Sidekick, as you look like a pretty experienced editor. Sources like Vimeo and InfluenceWatch are not considered reliable, and the tone of the article appeared excessively negative, even assuming the product was mostly negatively criticized.
I see that you removed the maintenance templates, although I'm assuming that was an accident due to an edit conflict? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

The maintenance template removal was inadvertent –sorry! The Vimeo and InfluenceWatch citations came from The Guardian and can be yeeted. As for the tone, it is notable that the Trump ground game in Pennsylvania has had to fall back on manual entry & "walk books" (which is why The Guardian is covering the logistics of canvassing here); I'm sure its successful use bears some mention. kencf0618 (talk) 00:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Kencf0618. Thank you for your work on K-factor (metalurgy). Another editor, Sir MemeGod, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good job! I didn't know that the bending strength of sheet metal had a name. :)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sir MemeGod}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SirMemeGod13:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

{{Re|Sir MemeGod}}

Thank you... and nor I ! It's exactly the sort of technical detail which Wikipedia cries out for. kencf0618 (talk) 13:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jumper Front Panel

Hello Kencf0618,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jumper Front Panel for deletion, because it's a redirect to a non-existent or deleted page.

If you don't want Jumper Front Panel to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Kencf0618. Thank you for your work on JFP1. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned at target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Kencf0618. Thank you for your work on Jumper Front Panel 1. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned at target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

{{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Good catch. To be clear this was the nomenclature on my Micro-Star motherboard, and I see now that that the ASUS has "TFP Panel". Shall research. kencf0618 (talk) 10:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western Idaho Fair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coeur d'Alene.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

East Idaho Fair moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to East Idaho Fair. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Fat fingers. kencf0618 (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)