Jonathan Deamer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Jonathan Deamer, I've tagged a redirect for CSD R2 that remained after you draftified Draft Hassan Hussein Musa. You might find the MOVETODRAFT user script helpful for draftification. It informs creators about the draftification process and tags remaining redirect for CSD R2 after the move. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up, DreamRimmer. Was the first time I've done that and wasn't sure I did it right. Will check out the script! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jonathan - hope you're keeping well and having a happy New Year! Just wanted to stop by and say it was a pleasure getting to know you at the end of last year through Train the Trainer (I've only just found out what your username is, otherwise I'd have wished you a Merry Christmas too!). I hope to get involved in more Wikimedia UK outreach work soon. :-) Patient Zero^talk 01:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Patient Zero, good to hear from you! Glad you found me here :)

Was great getting to know you too! I'm excited to run a training session or similar soon. Anything like that on your radar right now? Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I am hoping to be able to do that near to where I live in the forthcoming months, ideally with a group who identify as neurodivergent in some way and from an accessibility/inclusion perspective. I also wouldn't mind travelling a little further to do that if needs be! Patient Zero^talk 22:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Jonathan Deamer,

I encourage you to withdraw the AFD you provided a nomination statement is. Then it can be closed as several editors want to happen. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Liz, thanks for being in touch. Agree that closure seems like a good course of action, but am I able to withdraw a nomination that wasn't really mine? I didn't create the AfD myself. WP:PROCEDURALCLOSE says: "A deletion discussion that is poorly formatted should not be closed for this reason alone, in order to avoid biting new users. Instead, fix it." So I fixed the nomination created by another editor. I still see it as "theirs" to withdraw, but happy to be told if there's policy or consensus that suggests otherwise. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 07:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing it! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 07:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just reviewed your article on Camberley Kate, great work and really interesting subject matter. I have a suggestion for your future articles, as I'm not sure if you have applied for access to The Wikipedia Library yet. It's a really good method of finding sources, especially using Newspapers.com through it. Just for Camberley Kate alone, here's some examples I found:

• Dangerous? Not My Dogs Says Kate
• The story of Camberly Kate and the rabies town where many of the dogs are muzzled
• Moral of a good life
• The Dog Woman
• Memory of Kate lives on

Feel free to add these to the article, if you're so inclined. And that's just a sampling of the sources that can be found and just from Newspapers.com alone. There's a lot of other really useful databases in The Wikipedia Library. Silverseren^C 17:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much @Silver seren, this is really helpful! I do use Wikipedia Library occasionally, but I always search from the main homepage rather than going directly to Newspapers.com, and that doesn't seem to return sources like the ones you found quite as readily. I used it to access The BMJ for my work on Elizabeth Ward recently, but I'm sure there is lots of local news coverage for her too. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 17:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks too for reviewing the article/DYK :) Jonathan Deamer (talk) 17:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Jonathan Deamer. Thank you for your work on Robin Hood's Stone. Ingratis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the thanks! and for this article. I moved it because although German Wikipedia uses the "curly" apostrophe, English Wikipedia doesn't. Also, when translating from other wikipedias, for reasons of copyright, article history and so forth it's necessary to include in an edit summary the attribution statement given at WP:TFOLWP. On this occasion I've added it but please bear it in mind in any future translations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 09:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ingratis: Thanks for the helpful pointers! I quite enjoy the translation tool, so good to know. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Jonathan Deamer. Thank you for your work on Lenia Batres. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jonathan. I left you a note above: "when translating from other wikipedias, for reasons of copyright, article history and so forth it's necessary to include in an edit summary the attribution statement given at WP:TFOLWP." I've since sought advice on this, and - with good intentions - have somewhat misinformed you: a translation from another-language wikipedia does need to be attributed but the wording in WP:TFOLWP is only a recommendation - any form of words that conveys the message is fine, and that certainly includes the wording automatically added by the translation tool, so if that is how an article has been translated, there is no need to add anything else. One less thing to do! Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for clarifying! It makes sense that the tool would do the right thing by default, but I nonetheless like how explicit the attribution statement you suggested is. Will keep in mind! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jonathan Deamer, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Spicy (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! You were missed; next time! :) Jonathan Deamer (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, there!

I just wanted to inform you that the purpose of that page I created was not meant to disparage Avenatti, but to merely highlight the resonance of the nickname among many. Hope I've cleared things up in this regard. NavyBlueSunglasses (talk) 17:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

RoySmith (talk) 00:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your job on the article. I lost connection when I was working on the article. Thank you. Best, Reading Beans 12:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome! Hope I didn't steal your thunder. Didn't notice what an established editor you are until afterwards :) Jonathan Deamer (talk) 12:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Jonathan Deamer, nah, you didn't steal my thunder. I was surprised that you even did a WP:BEFORE which is something that don't happen much anymore. Thank you for the gracious work you’ve done. Best, Reading Beans 17:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

what's the problem with the statement off his own website? Joshua Olsen (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Joshua Olsen, thanks for reaching out.

The main issue with this edit is that it's a statement from Nadler's website claiming that he said something in the House, rather than an independent and reliable source claiming that he said something in the House. In general, we base what's in the encyclopaedia on what's written in such such sources so that we have more confidence we can trust it, rather than using what people say about themselves.

The quote also didn't have any context - it wasn't clear to me whether this was something Nadler had said, voted on, whether he was for or against it etc. It also needs to use inline citations, not a bare URL.

Finally, your edit immediately after this one on the same page was a sentence fragment that didn't make sense and didn't appear to be supported by the source. It wasn't clear whether or not it was vandalism. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 16:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I was personally involved in the case and know the edits made to his page to be fact. I'm working on accumulating sources and evidence, but I feel strongly that this information needs to remain on his page. Asdfjklmary (talk) 21:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Everything on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable based on reliable sources. Biographies of living persons have especially strict rules around this. Please don't add this information to the page until it's been reported in a reliable source. Even then, please note Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline, which it sounds like may apply here. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 05:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jonathan Deamer, welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors (GOCE). At the requests page, you recently accepted a request to copy-edit the article Beat Happening (album) but you haven't edited it since 19:52, 12 May 2024‎. If you've finished working on the request, please declare it finished by adding {{done}} to the request's section of the page, or use {{partly done}} if you think more work is needed, otherwise a coordinator will mark the request {{partly done}} so someone else can continue where you left off. Thank you for working on the article; all copy-editing help is appreciated. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 11:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

  Guideline and policy news

• Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.

  Technical news

• The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

  Arbitration

• The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
• The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.

  Miscellaneous

• WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

  Administrator changes

 

• Elli
• HouseBlaster
• Pickersgill-Cunliffe

 

• Brianga
• De728631
• Georgewilliamherbert
• Hyacinth (deceased)
• ProveIt
• The Night Watch

  Technical news

• Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)

  Miscellaneous

• The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

  Technical news

• Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
• Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

  Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ

I have no doubt JonathanDeamer2, one of today's school-kid puppets at Clovis West High School, isn't actually you:) DMacks (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Haha, that's funny :) Thanks for handling! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 07:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jonathan Deamer, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've now fixed the sortkeys of all the MPs - it's worth doing when creating a table like this, as it means they sort properly if you sort the table on multiple keys in succession. I fixed Bob Blackman's party, after I wondered why an SNP MP was represeting Harrow, but I don't know about Geoffrey Cox (British politician) where 1 + 1 = 1 so something is wrong! An interesting table. I do wonder whether most of the "total=1" are people renting out their permanent home while relocating to constituency or London for the job, so different in some ways from those who're into landlording in a bigger way. PamD 18:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much @PamD - I didn't know about sort keys, and will double check my sums! Any other recommendations for improvement welcome. I'm adding a "total by party" table now. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 18:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 18:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jonathan Deamer. Thank you for your work on Halen Môn. Another editor, Tails Wx, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Do feel free to expand the article with the existing sources in the article – there's some interesting information in all of them!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ Tails Wx 04:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

  Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

  Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
• Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
• The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

  Miscellaneous

• Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

The article Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner) and Talk:Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner) for comments about the article, and Talk:Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 15:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've never really left a thanks message before, but just wanted to thank you for your work contributing regarding List of landlord Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom (and its related category). MPs and their property portfolios don't often get attention outside of occasional controversy, so it's great to see you've been inspired by the latest controversy do do this.

Hope to have something I'm able to contribute something to it in future and wish you the best with your efforts Bejakyo (talk) 23:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Bejakyo, it's so kind of you to be in touch! I really appreciate it. Would love if you're able to contribute to the article too - let me know if I can help! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 00:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey Jonathan Deamer, I cleaned up the Boardwalk Battle page, added more sources and resubmitted. Let me know how it looks or if there's anything else I can do to improve the page. Bearcats21 (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of landlord Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of landlord Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Landlord members of the Parliament of the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 19:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey again, I'm sorry to see that the article and the associated category have been deleted. I wasn't able to contribute much beyond some minor stuff and being in favour of keeping the article (but missed the discussion on the category sadly). It's a shame to see both of them deleted like that.

Thought I'd ask if you think there's worth in us and some other of the keep/keep-but-expand lot and drafting a new non-list/generlaised article? either specificly on MPs and Landlords/Landlordism, or with Westminster Parliamentarians in gernal (as in including Peers of the House of Lords too), as well as the history of that. Alternatively could go broader again and talk about the intersection of landlordism and politics in the UK and the history of that? There's a few different ways of going about it

No pressure with anthing ofc, just wanted to see where you're at Bejakyo (talk) 17:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

  Administrator changes

 

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

 

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

  CheckUser changes

 

• Barkeep49
• Izno

 

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

  Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

  Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

  Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.