Hengamehf85

Hello Hengamehf85,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Master choa kok sui for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —ШαмıQ✍ @ 10:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Sir/Madam

Would highly appreciate if you can look help to improve the accuracy and quality of the article on Pranic Healing. I am a Pranic Healing practitioner and in fact by reading this article I noticed it does not give any accurate explanation about what Pranic Healing is in its real sense. Furthermore there are some paragraphs in the article that are not basically about Pranic Healing and are not written in relation to Pranic Healing specifically but towards alternative medicine and complementary therapy in general. Such as the below: "No peer-reviewed evidence or publications (in recognized medical journals) exist to support the claimed results of the practitioners. Skeptics such as James Randi have standing rewards of over US$1,000,000 for any practitioner who can demonstrate energy healing however this has never been successfully claimed.[4] In 1995, Jack Ruso described the method in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer as "mystical or supernaturalistic".[5]" Therefore I think the above to articles should be included in "alternative medicine" rather than in Pranic Healing and should be removed from this article because it is shown in such a way that these 2 are about Pranic Healing only that is not true.

Above all, what is lacking in this article in some explanation about how Pranic Healing works, its basic principles and techniques, when it was started and its evolution through time.

Thank you very much for your time and help in fixing the above issue.

Warm regards,

If you would like to add information about the methods of Pranic Healing as long as you can find a reliable source. Unfortunately even though you're a practitioner and I'm sure know all about the methods we need independent secondary sources and you can't just rely on experience. I'm sure you can imagine what a mess everything would be if they were just able to say they were an expert on something and make whatever changes they want.

As far as what you removed, I think I agree with you that the James Randi part isn't explicitly relevant to the article. I think the second paragraph is, though, so I'm going to restore it. If you still think it isn't you should start a conversation on the article's talk page and see what the consensus is. Chuy1530 (talk) 22:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Chuy, Thanks for your explanation and thanks for editing the Pranic Healing article. I actually understand your point and totally agree with that. I will try to edit the article and write more details about Pranic Healing using validated sources. Sorry for troubling you with the below request as well. I actually started a talk in Pranic Healing Article but no one really seem to care or do anything about it. I found you very helpful and caring, that is why I am writing this to you. Would also appreciate if you can remove this paragraph as well: No peer-reviewed evidence or publications (in recognized medical journals) exist to support the claimed results of the practitioners. In 1995, Jack Ruso described the method in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer as "mystical or supernaturalistic".[5] There are 2 reasons for that: One is that it is mentioned that no evidence or research has been done on Pranic Healing which is incorrect. Please find the links to academic researches and articles written about Pranic Healing below. Pranic Healing even has departments in hospitals including Apollo Hospital in Chennai, India and few more hospitals in US, Australia and India. Furthermore a university in Argentina is giving diploma degree to Pranic Healing as one of its fields of study: http://www.sanacionpranica.com.ar/index.php/cursos/cursos-de-sanacion/diplomado-en-la-usal another center for Educational Art & Science in India also offers post graduate degree in Pranic Healing: http://www.emagister.in/post_graduate_diploma_pranic_healing_courses-ec2755606.htm) Some of the researches: http://www.slideshare.net/PranicHealing/research-on-pranic-healing http://www.pranichealingontario.ca/SUPERBRAIN.pdf http://www.prana-heilung.de/files/pdf/Forschung/Zellkulturen_DrJones_dt.pdf http://www.heart-to-heart-healing.com/research http://www.heart-to-heart-healing.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/Intuition_Part1.5593325.pdf http://www.cihs.edu/whatsnew/Non-Touch%20Energy%20Healing_Koji%20Tsuchiya_ISSSEEM-v20n2.pdf http://www.academia.edu/809619/Pranic_Healing_A_Wonderful_World_of_Energy_Healing

Furthermore about the statement "mystical or supernaturalistic" if you go the refered website, you will see that this statement is called to a number of 20 to 30 various therapies. These are the specific statements about Pranic Healing in that quoted website: Advanced Pranic Healing: Subject of a “serious reference work” of the same name, written by chemical engineer and “Master Pranic Healer” Choa Kok Sui. The method allegedly uses “color pranas” and “chakral” techniques to effect “very rapid healing.” It includes “divine healing.” Sui is also the author of the bestseller Pranic Healing (1990) and his companion piece, Pranic Psychotherapy (1993). (See ”Pranic psychotherapy,” below.)

Pranic Psychotherapy: Application of pranic healing to psychological ailments. Pranic healing is a form of “paranormal healing” promoted by Dr. Choa Kok Sui. It posits chakras, meridians ("bioplasmic channels”), and an “energy body” that consists of an “inner aura, an outer aura,” and a “health aura.” Pranic psychotherapy includes four “healing techniques” besides those of pranic healing: an “advanced cleansing technique,” purportedly for the removal and disintegration of “traumatic psychic energy” and such; an “advanced form of energizing,” purportedly for the disintegration of “negative elementals” ("bad spirits”) and the repair of “etheric webs” that lie in a one-to-one relation behind chakras; activation and inhibition of chakras; and creation of a “positive thought entity” for the patient. In Pranic Psychotherapy (1993), Sui states: “Flicking your hand has to be done frequently when energizing in order to efficiently eliminate dirty energy.”

Therefore I would really appreciate if you can remove that paragraph as well. Thank you very much in advance.

A tag has been placed on Master choa kok sui, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Chuy1530 (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I believe I was mistaken to mark the article for deletion the way that I did. I saw where the article had been deleted previously and didn't see that that had been several years ago. I'm not saying that the subject is notable enough to deserve an article, but I thought I would stop by to explain why I put that tag on it and then removed the tag. Chuy1530 (talk) 09:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Chuy. Thank you very much for your help and guidance in writing and publishing articles.

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Master choa kok sui may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• meryl-davids-landau/11-chakras_b_1071691.html "The 7 Chakras You've Heard Of.. And 4 You Haven't"], ''The Huffington Post'', 11/04/11</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:19, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Choa Kok Sui may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• meryl-davids-landau/11-chakras_b_1071691.html "The 7 Chakras You've Heard Of.. And 4 You Haven't"], ''The Huffington Post'', 11/04/11</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks dear BracketBot. I just fixed it. :)Reply

You have been blocked for one week per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hengamehf85. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Arhatic yoga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:49, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply