Girona7

Thanks for uploading Image:Acne amy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

hey guys - i have looked up all i could find on image tagging, fair use, etc. but i do not know how to implement it. i want to claim that the image is protected under your fair use clause, and also add the copywrite info - that is held by Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. Where do I put this stuff? Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girona7 (talk • contribs)

In what page will you place the image (since it's fair use)? You'd upload the image and use the appropriate tag in the Licensing section of the image page. Xiner (talk, email) 22:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. Go to Image:Acne amy.jpg, click Edit this page, and use one of these. Xiner (talk, email) 22:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've removed {{no copyright holder|month=February|day=14|year=2007}} from the image. You added the correct license but have to remove that. Cheers. Xiner (talk, email) 22:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Acne_amy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 19:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Calmer Waters 06:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

Did you plan on having a projector available at the Edit-a-thon. I have a little powerpoint with some examples of problematic edits but if there isn't a projector I can skip it. GabrielF (talk) 04:21, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I am organizing an edit-a-thon at UMass Lowell and saw your stuff about the ADL edit-a-thon at Harvard. This is the first time I have done this. Any advice for the day of? I have been preparing heavily and promoting based on everything I have found so far. I am mostly worried about the actual event. Did you have to keep people focused? What happened on the day of? What did you, as the organizer have to do? You can post on my profile or email me at sara_marks at uml.edu --LibraryGurl (talk) 20:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sallie W. Chisholm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the barnstar. By the way, I just wrote an article about the scientist Min Chiu Li. If you have a minute, I'd very much appreciate if you could read it and give me your expert advice. GabrielF (talk) 16:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. I added a bit more detail about the chronology. I may tweak it a bit more. In terms of Li's later life and recognition - I was surprised at how little information was available. I have not been able to find an obituary. By contrast, there were several obituaries and memorial papers about Li's boss at NCI Roy Hertz. The only paper I could find that was specifically about Li came out in 2002, 22 years after his death. Hertz died in 2002 so this paper may have been an attempt to recognize Li in light of the tributes to Hertz. I've based a lot of the detail on Li's own account of his experiments. Ideally, if there were better third-party sources I wouldn't do this, but the fact that his retrospective paper appeared in a peer-reviewed journal, and that there are so few secondary sources that speak to his thinking and motivation give me some confidence in relying on this source. A logical next step, if I'm still interested in this topic, would be to write an article about Hertz.

I think this lack of information on his later life just makes your question of why he didn't receive more recognition - even a Nobel Prize nomination - more interesting. Reading between the lines from the fact that he was fired from NCI and that later articles focused on Hertz (in one case prompting Li to reply with a letter to the editor), I get the impression that Li was not particularly well liked. He also didn't seem to have that big of an impact after this initial work in the 1950s.

Setting aside the personal issues, was this Nobel-worthy work on its merits? Li was smart enough or lucky enough to find a cancer that just happened to be very responsive to chemotherapy. However, choriocarcinoma is a pretty rare form of cancer (it occurs in about 1 in 20,000 pregnancies in the US and perhaps 1 in 2,000 in parts of the developing world). Mukherjee cites a source that says curing choriocarcinoma saves about 35 lives in the US each year, which is great but pales in comparison to, say, lung cancer. I think the historical significance of Li's work was that it demonstrated that chemotherapy could be useful for solid tumors. Farber had previously shown that chemotherapy could have some (small) benefits for leukemia but chemotherapy was still seen as very experimental. So I think Li's work was an important iterative step, but not a huge breakthrough. Farber himself didn't win a Nobel Prize. I want to include some information about the incidence of choriocarcinoma in my article.

That leads back to your question about the connection with Jane C. Wright. Li doesn't cite her in his account - although he does credit another female scientist (Von Gilse, a Dutch researcher who worked with Li at Sloan-Kettering in 1954 - he doesn't give a first name) with using methotrexate to treat a melanoma patient. The patient didn't improve, but the experience gave Li the insight about the hCG levels. I don't have evidence that Wright directly influenced Li but I think she set the stage for a lot of subsequent work by trying methotrexate on solid tumors for the first time.

Anyway, thanks again for the review! I nominated the article as a DYK and it should be featured on the main page tomorrow night. Best, GabrielF (talk) 17:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the delay - I was away over the weekend. It's up now. Andrew Gray (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Joan Feynman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

As I said above, looks wonderful. Hopefully you will have expanded it enough to get the DYK. If it makes it we are watching it and will help promote it within the skeptic and science community. We love DYK, so much excitement during that 8 hour window. Sgerbic (talk) 03:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Use Wikipedia:Did you know/DYKcheck. When you run it, it will tell you at the top of the page what the size is, and if it has been expanded 5X. — Maile (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks...Not sure I get the paste-in-URL route (it's not doing anything for me) but I appreciate the link. Girona7 (talk) 19:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

OK, I think maybe you also don't know you have a .js page. Try this:

1) Go to your main user page (not talk page), and up in the URL type a forward slash and after that these words: common.js, and then your Enter key. It will probably tell you no such page named User:Girona7/common.js exists and tell you that you can create the page. Click where it says you can create the page. It should open a blank edit box, just like you do in any other page, except up in your URL it will read: User:Girona7/common.js .

2) Copy and paste what is below into the blank edit box, and and hit your Enter key:

importScript('User:Shubinator/DYKcheck.js'); //DYKcheck tool

That should create your .js page with the DYKcheck tool in it. After that is created, look over to the left of your user page and see if in the Toolbox at the bottom it says DYK check. If it does, you're set up. All you have to do is go to any page and click the DYK check. It will run a check and tell you the count.

If you do not see the DYK check in the Toolbox, please post a message on Village pump (technical) and ask someone to look at your page to see what needs to be tweaked to get the DYK check into your toolbox. And good luck. — Maile (talk) 20:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have reviewed your GA nomination of Henrietta Swan Leavitt. It just needs some additional referencing to pass. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

How is boku? – SJ + 19:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is lovely, tho could use some more INFness :) Girona7 (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ah so :) Here is some PLoS joy to make up for it... – SJ + 01:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cool! Thanks. Girona7 (talk) 04:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there!

I was very flattered that you thanked me for your DYK message, but unfortunately, the message was sent by a bot, so I cannot take any credit for it whatsoever.

Having said that (I don't know if you did), it would be really nice if you said thank you to your reviewers next time. Everyone is just doing something they love, so there's no need to say thank you, but that was really, really nice and I don't deserve it.

Lastly, thank you! Wonderful article. Really happy it got on the main page. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey there - Gotcha on the bot. I actually think I did thank my reviewers already...They were extremely helpful in answering my questions along the way and I was grateful. I'll go check to see if I missed any! Also, I'd like to learn how to become a reviewer myself now, so I can return the favor; that's high on my to-do list :) Anyway, appreciate the note! Cheers, Girona7 (talk) 04:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I never got an email back from User:Jalexander, the foundation's merchandise manager. Try emailing him at jalexander@wikimedia.org. Good luck with the meetup in AZ! GabrielF (talk) 00:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mention me and I shall appear (the benefits of the new notification system)! If I didn't get back to you I apologize let me look through my email again (I get far too much and it sometimes get buried :( ) and I'm happy to see if we can do something for this meetup as well (assuming it is 2 different requests and not the same one). Shoot me an email Girona7. Jalexander--WMF 01:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Leaving this here so that it's all on one spot, I found and responded to your email Girona7, I think I see what happened :( but if you still need anything we can figure it out. Jalexander--WMF 01:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cool, thanks to you both, and no worries - Just responded on email. Cheers Girona7 (talk) 01:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks James! GabrielF (talk) 02:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Girona7,Tucson would love to get involved in this event. As far as I know, we haven't had any Wikipedia meet-ups down here. I definitely haven't put anything like this together, so your help would be much obliged! Thank you, Cati (talk) 08:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)User:Caitlin.swartzReply

Sounds great, Cati! I'm going to beef up the event page in the next couple of days and try reaching out to other Arizonans as well before publicizing. Will definitely be in touch! -maia Girona7 (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I missed it, Girona7! Perhaps next time. paulshikleejr (talk) 23:06, 28 July 2013 (AZT)

We'd love to have you involved! I've added some of the Ada day scientists to our list of pages to work on, so you will see some familiar names. Best wishes, Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

.........Pomponia Leto (talk) 01:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I admit, I have trouble typing the citation references correctly so they don't get screwed up. I appreciate your help with the Bruce C. Murray article. Raryel (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

You are most welcome, Raryel! In case you are unaware: A helpful trick is to use the citation toolbar anytime you add a citation. Simply put your cursor where you want the citation to go, then click "Cite" and then "Templates" on the menu atop the text editing area. Anyway, thanks for your work on the Murray article, too! You've made some important additions. Girona7 (talk) 23:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Girona7! I found your name on the list of members at the WikiProject Women scientists page and wanted to ask you for your help. Maybe you've seen the message I left on the Women scientists discussion page last week, but I'm looking for someone to help with part of the article for UC Davis chancellor Linda Katehi.

Right now the information under the "Involvement in STEM" heading in her article is actually just about STEM in California in general. I'd like to replace this information with a few paragraphs that are about Katehi instead.

I am aware, as an editor with a conflict of interest, that I shouldn't fix up this information myself so I have shared on the article's discussion page a few paragraphs that I think would be a good replacement. Here is my earlier message. Would you be able to take a look at this and maybe help me out?

Thank you for looking at this. LindaF UC Davis (talk) 21:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello again Girona7! I replied to your message on the Linda Katehi discussion page, would you mind taking a quick look? Thanks! LindaF UC Davis (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Girona7. If you haven't seen, Kirill Lokshin added my replacement into the article, so the request is now taken care of. Thank you for your help here. Would you be interested in reviewing the updated information I'm putting together for the "Work" section of Linda's article?

Thanks again! LindaF UC Davis (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi LindaF UC Davis - I'm glad it worked out. Thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! By the way, if you are ever interested in getting other UC Davis community members to improve articles on UC Davis-related topics, you might consider an edit-a-thon. My opinion is that conflicts of interest can vary in degree, and that sometimes it's perfectly fine to make edits, even if you have a connection to the subject, so long as you are transparent about it, as you have been in this one case. Edit-a-thons that cover location-based or university-based themes are relatively common, and a great way to introduce students, faculty, and staff to Wikipedia. For more information on how to get one going, check out this page. Girona7 (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello again Girona7! It took me a little longer than I thought it would, but I've pasted another portion of the Linda Katehi article on the discussion page for other editors to look over. I've rewritten the information under the "Work" heading this time, because it doesn't have footnotes to support the information, which I understand information on Wikipedia should have. Here is the new message about this if you're able to help out again.

Thank you for looking at this. LindaF UC Davis (talk) 16:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Apparently, I can do this.

Jendeaderick (talk) 17:32, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the kitten, Jendeaderick!

Greetings, Girona7. I sent a shaggy dog ambassador query to your .....@nasw.org address. Is that the best way to contact you about such issues?

Thanks, Twepperson (talk) 16:26, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Girona7. Thank you again for your previous help on the Linda Katehi page under the "Involvement in STEM" heading. Very recently, I've left two new messages on the discussion page for editors to look over about restructuring the entire article in order to organize the information more logically and about condensing the information about the protest in 2011, so that the section just focuses on Katehi's actions. Here is the new message about reorganizing the page and my other message is directly below that one. If you're able to help out again can you look over either, or both if you have time, of these messages and let me know what you think?

Thank you for looking at this. LindaF UC Davis (talk) 23:55, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi LindaF UC Davis. I appreciate the work you are trying to do for Katehi's page. At the same time, I don't really have the time to review this right now, and I'm going to be honest and throw out there that I'm also not sure I agree with your taking so much energy to restructure her page, knowing the direct relationship you have with UC Davis. As I've said previously, I appreciate your honesty in disclosing your relationship, but at the same time, I would remind you that Wikipedia is not a platform for publicity. The edits from last time seemed appropriate, but when you start asking to condense or remove content relating to a controversy, that raises a red flag for me. Girona7 (talk) 14:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Look much better when they are taken from Saturn. – SJ + 02:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks much...and I wholeheartedly agree ;) Girona7 (talk) 03:05, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If only we could take a quick trip out there.... – SJ + 02:18, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Hi Girona7, I saw your post about starting an event. If you want any assistance, ping us at artandfeminismwiki@gmail.com. --Theredproject (talk) 03:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, will do. It's just a matter of seeing if someone will take the reins b/c I've been swamped and really need someone else in our local group to host this. Will definitely let you know if we are able to get it going. Girona7 (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good. If you need a space to meet in, I might be able to help. Also, I just popped over to your website from your user page and saw your name... did you go to Brown?--Theredproject (talk) 03:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Cool. Let me send a notice to the Boston-area folks to see if anyone will take the lead, and if not then I may ask about your possible location. And yep, I went to Brown :) Did you as well? Girona7 (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, '00. Michael Mandiberg. Your name sounded really familiar from Brown, but I can't remember from where (maybe VA, were you part of BDH?). Let me know if you want assistance re: location. My best means of contact is email, which is my firstname@lastname.com.--Theredproject (talk) 12:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I was in the Chattertocks and was an editor/reporter at the BDH. Class of '99. Nice to connect with a fellow Brownie. Will email you if I get any responses about someone willing to take this on. Girona7 (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

BDH. I was a photographer during my first two years. Also, SMFA and MassArt are down to host. They are just figuring out which has the best venue. I have passed on the info re: organizing that you sent to Pharos and will patch you in once I get them to finalize the time and location. Is the email on your maiaw.com website the best email to reach you? If not, shoot me an email at first@last.comTheredproject (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

This was great, altho I do feel I got a lot of learning for just a bit of editing :} Gloria Ruth Love (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Girona7, thanks for adding Joan Feynman to the project. It's not necessary, however, to add it manually to the list at WP:WOMENSCI: that list is periodically updated by a bot for articles that are tagged by the wikiproject. RockMagnetist (talk) 05:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ah, got it. Thanks for letting me know, @RockMagnetist. Girona7 (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the invite - this is a particularly busy "RL" period for me - but if you all have specific areas or questions or issues, leave a note on my talk page. -Classicfilms (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

for your note: I'll try to make it! best, -Darouet (talk) 21:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Great, hope to see you there! Girona7 (talk) 01:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking the time to talk and to give me the new tips! I'm working at it slowly. I'll DEFINITELY be in touch. Shaslang (talk) 01:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Girona7! I have a question: if there is something in an entry that is totally weird and irrelevant, is it OK to delete it without going to the talk page for the entry and asking? What are the rules for making major revisions (send me to the info page so you don't have to explain from scratch!). Thanks!! Shaslang (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @Shaslang. Yes, you can just delete anything that's odd or strange or that doesn't make sense. You don't have to leave a talk page message, but you should definitely leave a note in the "Edit Summary" field (right above "save page" / "preview" buttons). Here's a page on basic editing policies, including removing stuff. Personally, I suggest you make a number of smaller deletions rather than one larger deletion if possible so that a) you can more easily explain why you are removing each bundle of text w/o having to use the talk page; and b) if other ppl have issues with what you did, they won't revert the whole thing, but only the part they have issues with. Hope that helps... Girona7 (talk) 01:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

• To be a little talkpagestalkish and chime in - @Shaslang:, I forget what article it was, but at one point I deleted more than 10,000 words in one edit from an article because I thought the article was better without any of those words in it. With really big deletions like that it's definitely better to make a talk page note about it, but I'd highly encourage you to go ahead and delete stuff that just doesn't make sense when you come across it. In academic settings there's sometimes a hesitancy or reluctance to make mass deletions when someone asks you to edit their writing, but the same thing doesn't quite apply here, because articles don't belong to anyone in particular. (Of course, some people will still get offended when you delete content from an article - but plenty of weird things happen on Wikipedia, and that's usually one of the easier situations to calm down.) Also, hi Girona! I think I met you in DC previously though I'm not sure, but have been an online collaborator of Sally's for a while. Kevin Gorman (talk) 03:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Gatoclass (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Maia, thanks for hosting the recent gathering on Edit-a-thons. We're discussing the possibility of hosting something here at Houghton Library. Because of your substantial experience with these sorts of gatherings (and you're so close by!), I wondered if you might be willing to help either in planning or executing a Houghton Edit-a-thon. We are still in the very, very early planning stages so everything is fairly conceptual right now. Feel free to message me on my talk page or email. Best, --Rob at Houghton (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Rob at Houghton! Can you give me a sense of when you were thinking of doing this? Unfortunately my summer is rather booked at the moment, but let me know your desired timing. Truthfully, my schedule becomes much freer after Ada Lovelace Day in mid-October, so if you can wait that long, late Oct or early Nov could work for me. Best, Girona7 (talk) 16:42, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey Rob, I'm also willing to help out in the meantime if Maia is busy during that date, either on-site or from afar. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

It hasn't been confirmed how long my appointment here will last but I think we're aiming for September; conversations have been more conceptual so far and few details are solidified. We considered making this an "internal" rather than "public" editathon, for what it's worth. As more decisions are made, I'll keep you both in the loop. --Rob at Houghton (talk) 13:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Girona7, I let you a message on Commons in order to know if you could send me the sources of the file File:Female nobel laureates.png. Thank you in avance. Pamputt (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I would not to insist but just remind you if you could send me at pamputt0 _AT_ gmail _DOT_ com, the source file of File:Female nobel laureates.png in order to be able to translate it and to create a svg file from it. Thank you in advance. Pamputt (talk) 20:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Girona7, we are laying plans for the 2015 Art+Feminism editathon. As part of this process we have written two linked PEG and IEG grants. We have given extensive community notice, but haven’t generated substantial feedback. As one of the Satellite Event organizers we would really like your feedback, comments and questions, and if you support the grants, your endorsement of one or both of them. Additionally, we have confirmed International Women's Day, March 8th 2015 as the date of the international editathon. We hope you will be able to participate, as an organizer, facilitator, or participant. On behalf of my co-organizers. --Theredproject (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I didn't remove the redlink from Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins because I assume you're planning to create the article soon - I don't see any obvious indication that Ann is notable in her own right (apart from being part of this case), so I'm interested to see what you've come up with :) just a heads up that I have an eye on the article and I'll probably remove the redlink sometime soon if it doesn't appear. --MarkTraceur (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @MarkTraceur. Thanks for your note. I would appreciate it if you didn't remove the redlink. Among other things, that she is mostly notable for this case doesn't make her not notable. (There are plenty of Supreme Court plaintiffs or defendants who became notable because of the case in question.) I don't have the time to create an article for Hopkins immediately, but I have alerted several Wikipedians that this would be a good subject, and I'm sure one of us will get to it soon. There are plenty of references to her notability that I do not have time to dig up at the moment. Please let me know if you have any other questions :) Girona7 (talk) 16:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's my understanding - admittedly maybe flawed - that if your fame is due to one event, then that event should be covered, and not you personally. I'd imagine most plaintiffs/defendants who become famous are covered independently of the trial coverage, or at least the trial coverage includes coverage of them personally as well as coverage of the background of the case. I guess this could be a sort of grey area, but I'm happy to back off of this one :) --MarkTraceur (talk) 18:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure where you're getting that info from; plenty of people are famous for one event, and they themselves also deserve a page in addition to the event. Rosa Parks would be one very obvious example. Or, if you want an example from a Supreme Court case, take William Marbury from Marbury v. Madison. In any case, I assure you that the article for Ann Hopkins would/will meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Thanks! Girona7 (talk) 18:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi user:Girona7, I hope this finds you well. I am mining data from different editathons that took place from September 1 (2013) to September 31 (2014), to include this in the second round of data collection. I have gathered some information as regards articles edited, bytes added and users that took part, but I still have some questions regarding the inputs and I would also like to ask about your impressions. Can you please get back to me to my talk page or email mcruz [at] wikimedia [dot] org? Thanks! MCruz (WMF) (talk) 18:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Alex at Wikimedia suggested I contact you regarding getting support for an upcoming series of edit-a-thons I am planning in Lowell, MA. The WMF would like my co-planner and I to have at least 1 experienced Wikimedia on site to help us and make sure we have enough support for new editors. We are just starting the promotion of the program. Here is the blurb to find out more.

Please let me know if you can come out or, if not, the name of someone you think may be interested. Thanks. --LibraryGurl (talk) 14:33, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, LibraryGurl. Thanks for reaching out. This sounds like a fun event, but unfortunately I cannot attend. Let me reach out to a few people to see if anyone from our local group might be able/willing to come out for this. I will have them get in touch with you directly if so. If you would like, we can also create an event for this on our Meetup, even if we don't have a Wikimedian who can act as an ambassador. Girona7 (talk) 04:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks and help finding an ambassador would be great. I don't believe Wikimedia will fund the grant if we can't get an ambassador. We do have a page for the event on Wikipedia, but getting it listed as an event through Meet Up would be great. Thank you for your help and maybe you can come to one other events in 2015. --LibraryGurl (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ann Hopkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Brennan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your note on my talk page. The seven days period is for the initial nomination of the article at DYK after its creation or expansion. After it has been nominated, reviews and negotiations may take place over a period of days or weeks before an acceptable hook is arrived at. The nomination date is the only time critical one.

If you want to keep an eye on an article, or in this case a DYK nomination, you can add it to your watchlist by clicking the star next to "View history" tab near the top of the page. After that, clicking on your "watchlist" tag informs you of any activity on your watchlisted pages (it took me ages to discover this). Happy New Year! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the clarification, Cwmhiraeth. Didn't think to put the nomination on my watchlist, but I'll do that for reviews moving forward. Happy new year! Girona7 (talk) 23:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

There is a proposal at the IdeaLab that may interest you. Lightbreather (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The DYK project (nominate) 13:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm sorry to report that we are having a minor cat emergency, and I can't make our last night. I will keep working on my Suzy Varty article, and please let me know if you'd like me to show it to you before I publish it. This has been an excellent experience. I've learned so much! I'm looking forward to staying involved. Thanks, Rebecca Rtbhive (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bummer, Rtbhive, but no worries. It was great meeting you, and you did a wonderful job with your stub. I would recommend showing your piece to me before you publish, even if that doesn't happen for a while. Either way, keep in touch! Girona7 (talk) 21:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women only (cisgender or trans-woman, regardless of sexual orientation).

It is a place where women can go and be sure they'll be able to participate in discussions without being dominated by men's advice, criticism, and explanations. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 23:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey -- my Kristi Funk page was linked to by the Sheryl Crowe page!! Thanks for the help at the editathon! thinkdoc (talk) 03:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hehe. Yep, Thinkdoc, that was me: A bot had added a notification on the top of the article that it was an orphan (meaning no articles was linking to it). Fortunately, there were two other articles on WP that already mentioned Funk, so I just made those mentions into wikilinks and removed the notification :) Cheerio Girona7 (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Super - thank you! I assume that orphan pages are likely candidates for deletion? 100.34.170.150 (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Not necessarily, but it's always recommended that they link from at least one other article. Girona7 (talk) 17:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Though I am still clueless as a kitten out here, Thank You So Much for teaching me the ways of the wikimedian. You rock.

Rtbhive (talk) 16:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yay! Thanks for the kitten, Rtbhive :) Girona7 (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Maia. I was inspired by your post to the gendergap list and decided to test the waters over at moon landing. You might be interested to see the discussion at User talk:Gobonobo#Apollo missions: "crewed" vs. "manned". I was surprised to learn that gender-neutral language was discussed recently at WikiProject Spaceflight. gobonobo ^{+ c} 14:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks much, gobonobo! I appreciate the background on your efforts. Girona7 (talk) 01:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Maia! STEM pipeline would make a great DYK-- interested in expanding it? --Djembayz (talk) 03:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wish I had the time, Djembayz, but good idea!

See Maia Weinstock. Just thought you might like to know. Everymorning talk 01:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know, Everymorning!

Hello Girona7, I’m from the Program Evaluation & Design team at the WMF. Late last year we received data on edit-a-thons which were completed between September 2013 and September 2014--now the edit-a-thon evaluation report draft is ready for your review. I'm reaching out now because we would love your feedback before we announce the report to the broader community.

• Does the analysis and presentation resonate with your programs?
• How is the report useful to you as a program leader?
• What other data would help to tell the story of edit-a-thons?

Also, would you be willing to contribute a quote for the report? For example, your edit-a-thon was particularly successful at generating content and including a high proportion of new users. What do you think was the biggest contributing factor to that success? If you can send a quote by August 16th I would love to include it in the report.

We were able to present 121 edit-a-thons that brought in 2,275 participants and included 5,272 articles created or improved. We expect that this report will help our communities have a more comprehensive view of editathons around the world.

If you want to discuss edit-a-thons and the report findings with other program leaders, we’re hosting a virtual panel of program leaders with group discussion on the themes and findings the week of August 24th. If you have key themes you would like to discuss in the hangout, please do share them on the report talk page!

The estimated plan for review:

• Program leaders who submitted data to review until August 16.
• L&E to incorporate feedback and announce on the PE&D mailing list and social media the week of August 17.
• WMF blog post and a virtual panel the week of August 24.

Thank you again for all your work to track and showcase the results of your edit-a-thons. If you can give feedback on this report, we would appreciate the chance to highlight program leader insights and improve both this and future reports. Abittaker (WMF) (talk) 16:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I apologize for not getting back to you on this in a timely manner, Abittaker (WMF). Haven't had as much time to devote to Wikipedia this year, I'm afraid. Girona7 (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for letting me know, Girona7. Hope you have a nice and relaxing wikibreak. Abittaker (WMF) (talk) 20:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dear Girona7,

I’m Alex, currently a finance fellow (i.e intern) at the Wikimedia Foundation. I worked before for Wikimedia France, planning the Hackathon Lyon 2015 mainly. I'm today contacting you because of your activity for Wikimedia New England User Group. Kevin Rutherford told me to contact you.

Last year, Finance Fellows produced a financial report that included financial activity from every chapters. It was great and has been presented at the Wikimania in Mexico.

If you haven’t seen the results of the Report 2013, here they are: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapter-wide_Financial_Trends_Report_2013

We’re currently starting the Report 2014 and this year we also want to include user groups to improve the scope of our work. I want to tell you that I’ve tried to make the process as short and easy as possible, so that shouldn’t require a lot of your time.

The aim of such a report is global. It helps having an idea of how the money is used across the movement, it helps chapters and user groups to learn about best practice and finally it leads to more transparency through a qualitative work, which I believe is important.

Could you briefly tell me if you had any income and expenses in 2014? If you are not the person responsible for this, please tell me who is the user the most likely to know this information.

I’ll be your contact for this project this year, I’m looking forward to working with you!

ACella (WMF) (talk) 22:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi ACella (WMF). Please email me your request. You can find my contact info through the first link on my userpage. Thanks. Girona7 (talk) 16:10, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Can I talk to you on the phone about the Boston Wikipedia-turns-15 event, for a newspaper story in New Hampshire? 603-369-3313 - DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, DavidWBrooks. Thanks for reaching out. You can find my contact info to set up a time via my website, listed on my user page on my name. Thanks. Girona7 (talk) 23:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Ipigott (talk) 08:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessageReply

Hi Girona7. I'm an editor (not very active till now) of the Italian Wikipedia, where the gender gap is a real issue. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks, --Kenzia (talk) 16:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

--Ipigott (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Hi Girona7 -- After a editathon which looks to have been organised by you, new editor Jenmul created an article on Mona Jhaveri, which was swiftly tagged for speedy deletion. I've declined the speedy but the subject's notability probably isn't clearly enough demonstrated and I fear further deletion efforts -- could you help Jenmul out with improving it? Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Espresso Addict, and thanks for your note. Appreciate the help on removing the deletion request. I will see if I can find further articles supporting her notability, but she seemed notable enough to me based on the existing source materials. I will also take a closer look at the reasoning for the tag placed on the article related to "close paraphrasing." I'll suggest improvements to the article's creator but can't guarantee follow-up, so I'll keep an eye on it myself. Cheers, Girona7 (talk) 21:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Girona7! I might have time to do some work on this myself but I tend to get distracted by fresh deletion requests on salvageable articles. I wasn't sure why the close paraphrasing tag was placed, as on a very quick look it didn't look to be a particular concern. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 22:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Super, thank you very much, Espresso Addict! Girona7 (talk) 23:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Processed, along with associated but never used MMS flag. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Mindy Alper at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Yoninah. Sorry I've been MIA; appreciate your help with this DYK. Girona7 (talk) 04:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, TheGeneralUser. Writing here since your talk page appeared to not include conversations... Thanks for the note and appreciate the shoutout! Girona7 (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply