GamingWithStatoke

The article Leroy Kincaide has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate your help with the Jon Moxley article. But instead of sticking a link between HTML references tags, you could easily format it correctly. It makes the references list look a lot neater and organized. Thank you! Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 01:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Ron Killings appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ISTB351 (talk) 00:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

As you have forgotten the passwords for Tenchu123456 (talk · contribs) and Flamestar967 (talk · contribs), I have indefinitely blocked those accounts to prevent possible hacking of them.

Enjoy editing with this account - and may I suggest that you take a moment to go to my preferences and save an email address to it? The email address cannot be seen by anyone else, but it gives two important advantages:

1. Other editors can send you an email using Special:EmailUser
2. If you ever forget your email, you can request a new password at Special:PasswordReset

Of course, if you lose access to your email address, you will need to remember to update the email address in your preferences!

Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:16, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello GamingWithStatoke, I noticed your edits on Hawkins' and Reks' pages that you added back quite a lot of information which I deleted from their pages. I admit, it was my mistake that I did not provide a reason as to why I removed the information then. Therefore I've taken the liberty to explain it to you here. You see, the information I removed were... to put it bluntly, not important enough to Hawkins' and Reks' careers. You know when we say... ah, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia... that's exactly why we cannot afford to list every single thing Hawkins and Reks do every single week on NXT, on Superstars or where ever they appear. If we do that, the articles will become too long and messy and hard to read. How important is it that on one single day, Hawkins and Reks "debuted matching red and black attire", or had some "new variation of their outfits and a new titantron that featured the two of them," or had a run-in with Flo Rida and Heath Slater? At the end of the day, the small stuff doesn't matter, which is why I choose to remove them and instead provide a summary of what's going on with their careers without being too over-detailed. I hope you understand that. Starship.paint (talk) 07:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

As per Tyson Kidd, I noticed you've inserted face/heel turn in the headers of his career. The policy at WP:PW is that we try not to use such "jargon" in headers (or even in the main text) to make it easier for all members who are reading to understand. In this case we'd try not to list the "turns" at all, but if we have to, we usually use "fan favourite" and "villainous" to replace face and heel accordingly. Thanks for your understanding. Starship.paint (talk) 08:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey there. If you go to this page, you'll see a list of projects and tasks the group is working on right now. Especially look at the bottom, where a lot of larger tasks are listed. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 15:05, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

As to your other question: no, you do not need to inform the project if you edit articles, but if you create a new video game article please add it to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/New article announcements new article announcements page. Welcome to the video games project! --PresN 18:36, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

And if you're looking for articles to create, there's a whole page of video game articles that people have asked to be created. Fantastic work with Waveform by the way, we're happy to have you aboard! Nomader (talk) 19:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just spotted your work with Waveform and SMITE, great contributions. A few things that you might want to keep in mind - try and add an external link to the official website at the end of the article, it means that people who want to find out more about the subject can skip Google. Try to add categories too, it's simple, just find categories for the date, genre and platform. Regarding SMITE, I think it's worth requesting a move to Smite (instead of SMITE) to align with our naming conventions. Currently, the article at Smite is a redirect to an article that contains a dictionary definition. - hahnchen 12:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Sad Alice Said requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. reddogsix (talk) 02:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dcheagle | ^{Join the Fight!} 21:15, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

GedUK  11:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Arsion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

It is always best practice to create a draft article within your personal sandbox where you are almost always* guaranteed at least several days to work on an article and bring it into basic shape before anyone deletes it "before you are fucking finished with it"; rather than jumping right into live article space where "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used and redistributed by other people at will. " and articles are immediately assesed against the stand alone article criteria. You can request that the articles be moved there (aka "userfied") now.

• offer void for blatant copyright, blatant advertising, or blatant attacks against living people

-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've gone into sort of a semi-retirement from Wikipedia and officially no longer care what people do with TNA/WWE articles, so you can do what you want to with the article. I just thought that since day 1 in TNA Magnus was a tag team wrestler and when he broke up with Joe, he, for the first time, became a singles guy and that should be the start of a new chapter. Also, I was sure he'd be walking out of Turning Point with the title and that that'd be the end of his feud with Joe. But like I said, do what you like.Ribbon Salminen (talk) 14:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Creep Clash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creep Clash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Odie5533 (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ascension (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ascension (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. STATic message me! 11:07, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Noting here, I've undone your edit on Sterling James Keenan. Please don;t revert until a consensus is reached that cagematch is reliable. SJK is a WP:BLP, which requires a stringent level of sourcing. Also noting, I don't undertsand "it is" here and admitting it's not considered reliable 3 minutes later... Regardless, per WP:PW/SG#Sources cagematch is not conidered reliable (not mlisted under reliable sources). The last discussion on it determined it wasn't reliable, and no proof was been offered to the contrary. Who writes the match results? Where do they get their information from? Are they experts in the field? Does the site have proven fact-checking? How long has the site been operating? Solid answers to these questions are required for inclusion as a RS. You "think it is" just doesn't cut it. NiciVampireHeart 11:45, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Also noting here for the record, just by looking at the main page of cagematch, I found the answer to some of the questions. "little wrestling fan site" and at the site notice (in german, machine translated) as under "Nutzungsbestimmungen & Haftungsausschluss" (terms and conditions), "Für den Inhalt der auf dem Cageboard und im Rahmen des Bewertungssystems veröffentlichten Texte haften ausschließlich die jeweiligen Autoren. CAGEMATCH distanziert sich prinzipiell von jedem verfassten Text und jeder von einem Benutzer verbreiteten Verknüpfung auf andere Internetseiten." (The content of the information published on the Cageboard and texts as part of the assessment system are solely responsible respective authors. CAGEMATCH distances in principle from any written text and any spread of a user link to other web sites.) Ie, we not accept responsibility for the information published on cagematch. NiciVampireHeart 11:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Anita Sarkeesian. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leslie Butterscotch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the [[King of Trios#2010|King of Trios]] after their original first round opponents, Team Mexico ([[Skayde|Jorge "Skayde" Rivera]], [[Valiente (wrestler)|Valiente]], no showed the event. Amasis and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:45, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi GamingWithStatoke, I saw back in 2012 you added an unreliable source (ewrestlingnews) to Adam Ohriner's article. I just updated the style guide so you might want to check out the list of Unreliable sources to steer clear of. Thank you! starship.paint "YES!" 01:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article Adam Ohriner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Refs in article are unreliable affiliated with the subject. Hasn't worked in a notable promotion or held a notable title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 03:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the GHC Tag Team Championship page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:SmiteVideoGame.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  User:GamingWithStatoke/The Ascension (professional wrestling), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GamingWithStatoke/The Ascension (professional wrestling) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:GamingWithStatoke/The Ascension (professional wrestling) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply