GD 6041

Thanks for uploading File:Jinkazama-6.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

How about saying it got mixed to generally positive reviews?

130.245.236.34 (talk) 23:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

While the section could use better wording, I don't think "generally positive" or "generally favorable" is an overstatement. The reviews just don't seem to be that mixed. Most critics gave Tekken 6 favorable reviews with simply average to above average scores at best(7/10, 8/10, 3.5 out of 5) which reflects in its metascores of 79-80. The worst scores that I found so far was a 3/5 from Giant Bomb(which pretty had the same praises and complaints as most critics) and 6/10 at Worthplaying. --GD 6041 (talk) 01:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I changed the CSD reason for this article. The main article has already been translated into English at Hebe de Bonafini. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 04:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply