Your submission at Articles for creation: News Tamil 24×7 Tv (August 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, G11slm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: News Tamil 24×7 has been accepted

edit
 
News Tamil 24×7, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: IP Digital Tamil 24/7 Media Pvt Ltd (September 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:IP Digital Tamil 24/7 Media Pvt Ltd

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:IP Digital Tamil 24/7 Media Pvt Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alien Temple (October 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bunnypranav was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This temple is a subject of a temporary news story without demonstrated lasting notability. Most of the sources, although reliable, are just reporting the sudden burst of spike in coverage. The sources are primarily news reports directly quoting the creator, rather than independent secondary sources analyzing the significance of the temple.

This has enough violations of WP:PERSISTENCE, and WP:PRIMARY.

Also, the Cultural Significance and Public Reception are completely unsourced.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of S.K. Gokula Kannan

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on S.K. Gokula Kannan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 16:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

your username

edit

FYI, your username includes "G11" which also stands for WP:G11 on Wikipedia, a speedy deletion policy regarding promotional content. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 16:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Advice

edit

Hi. I have deleted your draft because the only place you are allowed to write about yourself is your own user page. Note that you are NOT allowed to link to your Youtube channel, blog, Instagram account or any other such content or to promote your skills, services, publications, recordings, etc. Please do not post your CV anywhere on Wikipedia. It would just make you look silly. Deb (talk) 16:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Gokulakannan SK per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gokulakannan SK. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 21:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

G11slm (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes, I apologize for this. I was unable to log in to my old account, so I had to create a new one. I only made this page using citations or sources available on Google, including government citations. I now understand that only administrators can publish deleted or removed pages. Please believe me, I was only using this account. I follow, have been following, and will continue to follow Wikipedia guidelines. I hope you may consider unblocking me. Thank you for your consideration. G11slm (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Sock accounts are not unblocked. If you wish to appeal, you need to go to your original accounts and appeal there. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.