Eregli bob

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

• If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

• You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

• If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 14:35, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

G'day

How did you create the Osmanlı page? It appears to be a subset of the existing Osmanli page. Any reason for the spelling that you know of? I wondered whether the last vowel might be a 'barred i' in Turkish, for example. Andrewa 03:07, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Your edit to Baruch Goldstein was blatant vandalism. Please do not repeat it. →Raul654 04:12, Apr 13, 2004 (UTC)

• I apologize for my earlier tone. Dori (below) is correct - please read about our policy of neutral point of view. →Raul654 04:24, Apr 13, 2004 (UTC)

Please check out Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. You can't say "Perisher Blue...is the best" because that's not neutral - someone else may disagree. Thanks Dysprosia 04:18, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

hi! thanks for your much welcomed and needed updates on australian geography. welcome to the 'pedia! clarkk 15:05, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Hi Bob. I hope you don't mind me following you around adding pictures. I'm really enjoying your contributions to Australian geography. They are making a substantial difference to the 'pedia. Best -- Tannin 14:07, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Hiya.. just wanted to drop a note and give you some praise for the whole bunch of new articles you've been creating for various places in New South Wales - good work, keep it up! —Stormie 05:08, Jun 13, 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Hi and thanks for your question about how the desalination actually occurs. I emailed Solar Systems, and this is what they said:

"Salinity interception schemes in the area pump saline ground water to the surface (reducing the water table) evaporate the water in an old lake or depression. Salt is harvested as a byproduct. Typically these schemes evaporate around 3 gigalitres of saline water per year, and the limiting factor is the evaporation rate.

Our power station will be sited near salt-affected land, and will be integrated with existing/proposed salinity interception schemes. We reject heat into the saline water stream, evaporating around 1 gigalitre of water. The saline stream then goes on to the lake as before, but is "preconcentrated". Thus we add around 25% to the saline interception extraction volume while helping to protect high-value agricultural land."

I will add this info to the article's discussion page. Johnfos 08:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Yes, "popular" must be a mistranslation (regarding French presidential election, 2007). It was to mean "working-class" or lower middle classes, against wealthy, posh, middle upper class & upper classes... What term do you propose instead? Someone changed it to "populous", but I reverted him as a "populous neighborhood" seems to mean a neighborhood with a high demographical density. Tazmaniacs 10:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Look I don't know. I realised that "populaire" in French is not synonymous with "popular" in English. "The Popular Republic of China" is a frequent nonsense translation from French. "populous" is not right either. I understand the intended meaning now but how to represent it in English is difficult.Eregli bob 12:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Email Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. -- WebHamster 11:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have declined to speedily delete Email Limited based on the assertions in the article and on the talk page but I don't really understand why the references are on the talk page rather than where they belong, which is in the article. Please source the article rather than the talk page! You can learn much about the mechanics of sourcing at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please see this page Jimfbleak 14:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do drop back to Gun Politics in Australia and discuss - I have provided several references supporting the claim you called 'nonsense' that 1920s gun laws were inspired by concern about Communism. If you have other references I will be pleased to read them.

Regards ChrisPer 04:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

"The Flinders Ranges National Park is located in the northern part of the Flinders Ranges. The park covers an area of 912 square kilometres, northeast of the small town of Hawker. The park includes the Wilpena Pound and St Mary Peak."

That wasn't clear enough for you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.83.244 (talk) 16:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on AED Oil Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 14:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Manilla River requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PookeyMaster (talk) 04:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Eregli bob. It appears that you copied and pasted MacIntyre River to Macintyre River. Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself using the move link at the top of the page, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you, Ravenna1961 (talk) 02:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baba_burnu_3957.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rapanui Rock, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://library.christchurch.org.nz/TiKoukaWhenua/rapanui. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Stephen Koroknay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --smurdah (talk) 01:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

To Eregli bob,

Hey I'm Anson I created the BBY Group and Glenn Rosewall wikipedia articles using the account Ansonrosew. Firstly, I wanted to thank you for your contribution to the discussion on Glenn's page as to why his article should be kept. If you wouldn’t mind I would greatly appreciate any help you could further give (maybe in just spreading the word) to ensure that his page stays up on wikipedia.

Thanks Again, Anson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ansonrosew (talk • contribs) 08:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Eregli bob! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Brian Preston - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Ian Ramsay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Carole Simpson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Jenny Coupland - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Catherine Cusack (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Stephen Koroknay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

FYI: I removed the sentence from Debra Medina (politician) where you corrected the spelling because it was actually vandalism by an anonIP. Cheers —DoRD (?) (talk) 22:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

--Redrose64 (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Eregli Bob: I notice you recently created Airship Industries. I've been working on an article of the same name in my userspace for the past few weeks. (The article is finished, aside from needing revision to the units and to a few of the references, as far as the end of "Proposed rigid airships," but there's obviously a lot still to be done on the remainder.) Please let me know whether you'd like me to merge my article into the one you created immediately (in which case I'd like the article to be tagged with Template: Under Construction until all the sections are fleshed out), finish it and then merge it, of, alternatively, if you want to split work on the remainder of the article.Grover Snodd (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Go for it. Whatever you like. I just created that entry last week because I noticed there were several unimplemented links to it and I had some recollections about it because of my prior dealings with the notorious Mr Bond. I wasn't planning on adding any more to it, unless I happened to find one of my photos of his airship taken in 1988.Eregli bob (talk) 16:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  You might note that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Johnstown Flood, also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Thank you.--Rumping (talk) 11:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

See Talk:Mississippi_State_Penitentiary - The source I use does use the one in 30 figure, but after I checked the US Census of 1990 it seems like the population is 10 times what the author said it was; it's likely he forgot a zero. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

You've got a ref to "Blair 1996" which needs explaining. I hope it doesn't mean that you've lifted the whole article from some other source? PamD (talk) 07:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

No, I lifted that sentence from a different wikipedia entry. I will fix up the reference, thanks for drawing it to my attention.Eregli bob (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've redirected Point Stephens, New South Wales to Fingal Bay, New South Wales as it was unreferenced, mostly original research and contained numerous errors. Point Stephens is not an island, it's listed on the Geographical Names Register as a "point on the coast".[1] While the land on which it lies is sometimes incorrectly referred to as an island, it's actually just a promontory and it's not called Fingal Head. Fingal Head is the point on the mainland, about 2.6km west of Point Stephens.[2][3] Point Stephens doesn't "lie off" Fingal Bay. It's actually part of the suburb,[4] so that's where its description belongs. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

It looks like an island on Bing Maps where it is labelled as "Fingal Island" - less clear on Google Maps. Is the neck of land sometimes covered by water? Silent Billy (talk) 02:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I stumbled across the article you created about this. I've only taken a few moments to look into it, and I certainly don't want to fan any flames, but my initial impression is that there was some useful information in this that you created that's not present in the redirect target. I'd need to look into the matter much more closely to come to a firm conclusion about this, but that version was so well cited and seemed to include so much useful information that it seems (at first glance) a shame to lose all that. If you just didn't make a mistake of one place for another, and if you can do so within WP policy, I'd encourage you to either include at least some of that info in the redirect target or (?) seek consensus to recreate it. Just do so politely, is all, if you attempt that. ;-) Best,  – OhioStandard (talk) 05:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User talk:AussieLegend. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 11:23, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 17:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Bidgee. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bidgee (talk) 07:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I see that a couple of years ago you created an article on Stephen Koroknay. As mentioned previously on your talk page, it is a requirement that all articles, and especially those on living people (WP:BLPs) are referenced. I can't find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources that prove Koroknay's notability. Simply being a CEO of a company isn't considered sufficient on its own, you need significant coverage in reliable sources. Before I nominate the article for deletion, I thought I'd give you the chance to find some references and save the article. If you aren't interested in doing so, then reply here and I'll see if the rest of the wikipedia community thinks it's worth saving or not. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 15:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Steve Koroknay has been the CEO of three ASX-listed oil companies, all of which were acquired by other companies through takeovers. He appears to be currently a director of four companies listed on the ASX. He has been on the boards of directors of ASX-listed companies since at least 1987. He has been a member of the board of the oil industry's trade association, APPEA. In my judgment this establishes notability to the necessary degree. Eregli bob (talk) 17:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

There are two separate issues here. #1, is verifiability. #2 is [[WP:N|notability]. If you can find good, reliable, independent sources to backup your claims, then I'm happy that you've satisfied #1, and I'll probably never visit his article here again. I now see that you've added a bunch of refs... at first glance a couple seem OK, but most seem to be from related organisations, ie the annual reports from his own companies. If someone was to challenge the article (I won't do it, now that it is referenced), then they may "ignore" those ones, and still claim that he doesn't satisify the general notability guidelines. I think he probably just does. Thanks for your quick efforts. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 23:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Baba burnu 3957.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 78.55.212.248 (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talk:First English Civil War#Aftermath ? I've tried to answer your question. Let me know if there is anything else you want to know, or if you think that there is anything else you think needs adding to the article. -- PBS (talk) 10:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deep breath. To explain the negotiations using sources would take too long so here goes.

Under British constitutional theory right up to today the reigning monarch can do not wrong, unless they are badly advised. So if they make a mistake then you replace their advisers, in modern parlance the PM and his cabinet. As the Queen does not in fact make decisions on her own but always accepts the advised by ministers in a government in one of her realms. If they make mistakes then it is they who are replaced and not the Queen. With me so far?

The thing is that in the first half of the 17th Century most people believed that kingship had a mystical quality to it because the King was ordained by God and really could not do any wrong. But he could be badly advised and those advisers could and did pay with their lives (see Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford).

Unlike almost every other civil war it is next to impossible to work out who would be on what side in the English Civil War. It was a true civil war, and not just a war fought within the territory of a state which if drawn differently would be a war between two states eg the American Civil War, which were based by and large on regional loyalty, or the Bosnian war of the 1990s that was based on ethnicity.

So the people who fought for the English Parliament were not fighting against Charles but against those who had advised him badly. Indeed as the Earl of Manchester put it "The King need not care how oft he fights... If we fight 100 times and beat him 99 he will be King still, but if he beats us but once, or the last time, we shall be hanged,"

The civil war was won when King Charles surrendered to the Scots -- he had no choice his forces had been destroyed in the field to the New Model Army precursor of the British Army who were by then the best army by far in the three kingdoms and uniquely among the armies of the early modern age a political force in their own right.

It was not an "unconditional surrender" by the king, because no one had been fighting the king they had been fighting the evil advisers and most on the Parliament side thought that stripped of those the King would be mailable and reasonable (They were wrong he was a zealot who believed in the divine right of kings and went to his execution wearing an extra shirt so that he would not shiver because of the cold and it be mistaken for fear).

The leadership of factions who had fought on the side of Parliament in the first war do not seem to have ever had any intention of having a constitutional arrangement that did not involve Charles. They just did not have the necessary intellectual/legal tools or the emotional will to contemplate a settlement without him. So for the next two years he negotiated in bad faith playing the different factions of the coalition that had won the First Civil War against each other until in the end they fought a war against each other (see the Churchill quote).

At the end of the second war the Grandees in the Army came around to the more radical faction in the Army's point of view that King Charles was not badly advised, but bad "Charles Stuart, that man of blood" and arranged his execution. A twist in this tale is that Freeborn John was against the regicide because he thought it damaged the chances of the Levellers gaining a true democracy, the very people one would have thought would have been in favour of the regicide. However given the way the republic and the restoration went he was more preceptive than most others of his generation.

--PBS (talk) 11:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Danielle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Grabben Gullen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Gofton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunderland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I read your reference, regarding the Corsica, but find that the phrase in the header a little dubious. I mean, I am not a student of naval/maritime history, but the fact that the reference indicated that the Corsica was in the "neighborhood of the Burlings Light" does not seem to be an endorsement that British mariners knew them as the Burlings. Further, the quote refers to the Burlings Light, and not, in fact the Burlings Islands. Can you please provide more direct proof to support your phrase? ^{ruben jc}ZEORYMER (talk) 16:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

There are dozens of reference to this. I will add some more.

I appreciate your efforts: you completely proved your comments. I doubt dozens of additional proofs are necessary. Great work.^{ruben jc}ZEORYMER (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I tried to fix Detroit Electric as you requested. Please take a look. Kendall-K1 (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, right, the other west. 8-) --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your correction: nice catch. Thanks. RMcPhillip (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, You edited the Lundy article with an edit summary "This is nonsense. There are black rats all over the UK" however all the sources I can find (which I've now added to the article) suggest it is rare in the UK and has almost completely been replaced by Brown Rats. If you have a source which says otherwise please add it to the article.— Rod ^talk 10:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corryn Rayney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corryn Rayney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Moondyne (talk) 14:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the work on Gibraltar Peak (Canberra). :)

LauraHale (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peel Shire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peel River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gordon, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Shore Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Heal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Heal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. j⚛e decker^talk 01:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chevrolet El Camino may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:28, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Simpson (appliance manufacturer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Crean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Crean until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 22:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

181.179.20.126 (talk) 08:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC) The King of Saudi Arabia leads the executive through the post of "Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia". The Crown Prince and Deputy Crown Prince are First Deputy Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, respectively.Reply

An article that you have been involved in editing—Swan Hill—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jonathan O'Donnell (talk) 23:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

wizzito | say hello! 07:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Southern Sydney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

spurious, vague, POV geographic definition.When originally created, the article described the area as "a vague, informal term". A subsequent edit referred to the area as "an informal term" and from 2006 to 2016 the area was described as "a general term". For most of its existence, the article included a description prefaced by "Depending on the context". Other places are also referred to as "Southern Sydney". How is South Sydney not part of Southern Sydney? Geographic nonsense!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply