Eponymous-Archon

Hello, Eponymous-Archon, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 02:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Patrick Quigley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 01:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just getting back to you on the deletion of this page. PQ is cited on Mark Jackson's page as the NBA star's high-school coach. I thought that was sufficient cause to include him, especially since there are numerous articles on high-school sports. PQ had a long career with an important Catholic brooklyn high school and coached in the prestigious Five Star basketball camp, which is also cited in several articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eponymous-Archon (talk • contribs) 00:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi EA,

The article you wrote on Patrick Quigley stated that he is a high school coach and an instructor at a basketball camp. The former high school coach of a professional athlete isn't notable. The guideline on notability for sports figures is here. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 04:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

In the name Nostra Signora di Guadalupe a Monte Mario the Monte Mario part of it is translated into English exactly the same as it
is in Italian.71.72.18.201 (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is in regard to List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, December 2014. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your note. I'm not sure how many other articles are affected by this problem. I posted at the copyright problems page to let them know there might be an ongoing issue. Would you be able to clean up any other articles you created/edited with this issue, and follow up there to let them know what changes you have made? Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, I see you already did it! Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

And I'll take care of other similar entries on related pages. (Frankly I'm a little surprised this is not considered fair use: a few sentences with citation.)Eponymous-Archon (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, most Roman theatres around East Mediterrian are actually continiuation of the older Hellenistic theatres, ie, in most cases they were built by pre-Roman people. Does the list include those ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 15:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm working on the assumption that most were in use and also renovated under Roman rule (if not actually built then). If one is obviously Greek (and I suspect there are _very_ few of those, then I suppose I would leave it off. Even the theaters in Athens were renovated though. Does that make sense to you? We could also argue about calling this whole category "Roman" instead of Hellenistic, as you say, but there it is.) - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 23:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I'm impressed with the improvements you've made to the Roman Calendar page. I do, however, have a slight quibble. You state that there are no extant Fasti until after Augustus, yet you included the image of the Fasti Praenestini, the caption of which states that it dates from 60BC. Really there are two quibbles - if the Fasti are only known since Augustus, then mentioning them at all is inappropriate for the article about the pre-Julian calendar. Conversely, if at least one Fasti is pre-Julian, then the references to them dating to after Augustus should be rewritten.

Otherwise, excellent work. Silas Maxfield (talk) 10:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. You make a good point about the image. I was just re-organizing things and trying not to delete more material than necessary from the Fasti article, so I didn't even think about that (OK, really I'd barely read it). I'd rather approach this by deleting the bit at the start about this article doing just the pre-Julian calendar. Leave the Julian calendar section short with a link to that topic's article, but don't say that we're not covering it. What do you think, Silas?

The Romulus and Numa sections need work too. They're totally fictional reconstructions by the ancients. Michels is good for this.- Eponymous-Archon (talk) 15:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've removed it from the intro to shorten it. But I've put it in the list of kings, partly to emphasise their legendary status, which the reader may have forgotten about by the time they've read all the stuff in between. As for the destruction of records, I wouldn't expect that burning papyrus or parchment would leave much archaeological evidence, and I don't think it's disputed that the Gauls did attack Rome. And if the records hadn't been destroyed, we would know more about how many kings there were, and what they did. They probably weren't descended from gods and so on, but there would also be more plausible facts known too. (And there were plenty of ancient kings who did rule for 30 or 40 years, so it's not completely impossible that the more recent ones could have been real people.) I think the reader is entitled to some explanation of why so little historical information is known. Richard75 (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sure, some burnt paper wouldn't leave much of a trace, but these were unlikely to have been written on anything paper-y. There's actually no archaeological trace at all of the alleged Gallic sack, which leads most scholars to conclude that the Roman account of it was exaggerated. Probably the mercenary Gallic army arrived, threatened the city and left after being paid off. Maybe with some gratuitous but minor damage. So this idea that all these records were destroyed in the sack has been downplayed in recent decades. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Drepana may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in indirect discourse, so the Latin here reflects what Pulcher's actual words would have been.)</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Since that section is archived you will need to move it back to the talk page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 00:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC).Reply

Hi Eponymous-Archon, you may wish to comment. Kind regards -- Marek.69 ^talk 04:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

see chart. Johnbod (talk) 22:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Johnbod: I used these data. But in any case, there are only a few days with noticeable amounts of rain in Rome over the summer, and they're not significant cooling events for the Pantheon. (I've been there in a summer rain.) And regardless, the source isn't authoritative on the topic.--Eponymous-Archon (talk) 23:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited As-Suwayda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Can you explain why it was necessary to remove the picture from the article Battle of the Caudine Forks? Kanjuzi (talk) 14:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Because it's not a picture of the battle described in the article. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 14:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

True. On the other hand it is approximately the same century and region, and shows the armour of the period. Could it be used if a more accurate title was given, I wonder? Kanjuzi (talk) 04:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

It doesn’t even necessarily show a battle and the caudine forks weren’t a battle anyway. - 87.26.103.47 (talk) 06:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Roman amphitheatres in Germany has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:04, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I don’t see a reference to the translation of “ad” as “to” in the section on arguments from commitment, so I’m not sure what you’re referring to. If there’s a need to provide a further English definition for ad, it should be somewhere that’s not where the phrase “ad hominem” is described. I’m going to revert your reversion, unless I’ve missed or misunderstood something. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC) Eponymous-Archon (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

19:17 Eponymous-Archon talk contribs moved page Talk:Foce del Sele to Talk:Heraion at Foce del Sele - I won't revert, but please DON'T do undiscussed moves like this. Among other issues this makes the article a good deal harder to find. Is this the WP:COMMONNAME? Rather doubtful. Johnbod (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Johnbod, just being bold there. This is indeed the common name of the site, and "Heraion" is the more important part. A quick search reveals the Wikidata page and the Italian version both have this name. The French and Finnish versions use "Heraion" without the place name, though the latter includes it parenthetically. The 1951 article in the references also calls it by this name (in Italian). The museum at Paestum itself calls it this in English. Recent work by Greco and La genera (not cited here) also call it that (in Italian and French, resp.). I can add a redirect from the old name. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Now I see, thank you. I linked the article to the correct Wikidata item then, since the previous one was about the modern town.--Alienautic (talk) 20:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alienautic Perfect! So many little things to fix. Thanks. -Eponymous-Archon (talk) 20:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Roman theatres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alife.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

P Aculeius (talk) 13:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Antikythera Mechanism indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply