Curlymanjaro

Hi Curlymanjaro! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:14, Thursday, April 16, 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stephen Need, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Curlymanjaro. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Stephen Need".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Stephen Need}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. -- numbermaniac (talk) 06:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:LycianTombPhellus.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 01:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlton le Willows Academy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AS-level and BTEC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Terry at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Curlymanjaro,

I noticed you're active in British related topics. Can you help me out here? I would like to know the names of three gentlemen who are found in a picture in this link: [1]. The picture is the one with the caption: "Opening of the Governing Council meeting Isola di San Lazzaro degli Armeni..." Now I believe one of them is Prince Charles Philippe, Duke of Anjou, the other is, as I assume, Charles Falconer, Baron Falconer of Thoroton, but the other one I don't know. Who and what is a "the Grand Master"? I'd really appreciate your help if possible. Thanks. P.S. Please ping me. Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stephen Need, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Curlymanjaro. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Stephen Need".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joseph Terry you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mackensen -- Mackensen (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article Joseph Terry you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Joseph Terry for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mackensen -- Mackensen (talk) 01:41, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article Joseph Terry you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Joseph Terry for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mackensen -- Mackensen (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Sir Joseph Terry at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wilfrid Eggleston you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 00:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article Wilfrid Eggleston you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wilfrid Eggleston for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article Wilfrid Eggleston you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Wilfrid Eggleston for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 02:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fred Pepper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article Fred Pepper you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Fred Pepper for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:UniversityofAberdeenLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sir James Mor Macdonald, 2nd Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parliamentarians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Oakley (designer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuzes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gabriel Pleydell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article Gabriel Pleydell you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Gabriel Pleydell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, On behalf of WP:WPSCH, I would like very much to suggest you consider getting this article through a GAC. You've already promoted several articles to GA, and this one looks as if it's ready. If you want to do this, as a courtesy, you may wish to touch base with Bleaney who created the original stub. I'd be happy to give the article a a final 'once over' peer review if you want to go ahead. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sad to say, the project through the Wikipedia Library has been discontinued. See Wikipedia Talk:BNA#Discontinued. Tony Holkham (Talk) 19:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

That is a shame. Thanks for the ping though! Curlymanjaro (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 07:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Are you still interested in access to this database, I still have no response to the email I sent you. For now I've marked your request as   On hold--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 02:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the Gabriel Pleydell article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 7 April 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 7, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1628 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Labour Party of Scotland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Independence from Europe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Independence from Europe you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Independence from Europe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Labour Party of Scotland you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Labour Party of Scotland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Independence from Europe at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for contributing to DYK. Please be aware that page creators/nominators are not allowed to review their own hooks, nor are they allowed to promote their own hook to prep. I have returned your hook to the noms area so another editor can promote it. Please be patient. Yoninah (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your other nomination that you promoted, Independence from Europe, has also been returned from prep. As Yoninah said, please be patient—these nominations will eventually be moved to prep by an editor who frequents DYK. It could take a couple of weeks; we currently have a backlog of 138 approved nominations, and are promoting 56 per week. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Alex Shih^Talk 12:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Thomas Richard Morris at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Elisa.rolle (talk) 02:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Richard Morris at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

This is back. I think his mayoralty would be enough. There is not a word about his death, no obituary, and very little about his election. If you have access to relevant newspapers it might help. FWIW, I think his mayoralty of a comnunity of this size is notable but its not up to me. One could also quibble over the decision to pull this from the DYK queue given that you had fulfilled the DYK requirements. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

One way or another, Curlymanjaro, we need to hear from you on the nominations page. Please post there soon if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I've been super busy with school and I feel that I've already set out my argument for the page's notability. As for the DYK nomination itself, I'm not in a position to carry on arguing about the finer details, I just thought it would be a neat thing to do in a short space of time. In other words, I don't mind. Curlymanjaro (talk) 01:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wahey! Thanks a lot; nice to know that someone is in my corner. Curlymanjaro (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Richard Morris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Richard Morris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 05:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Highlands and Islands Alliance you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Highlands and Islands Alliance you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Highlands and Islands Alliance for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi - If a valid sub-category is in place, then the parent category shouldn’t be added. For example if “South Carolina Gamecocks football players” is present, then “University of South Carolina alumni” isn’t needed. All U of South Carolina football players are alums of the school. See WP:SUBCAT. Thanks. Rikster2 (talk) 21:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Friends of the British Overseas Territories has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is self promotion of a non-notable charitable trust with citations that reference nothing of note. I recall a similar article was created and deleted a while ago, but it seems to have re-appeared.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 22:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bill Bowman (Scottish politician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 11:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Bill Bowman (Scottish politician) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Bill Bowman (Scottish politician) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carlton le Willows Academy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fingrmouse -- Fingrmouse (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Carlton le Willows Academy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carlton le Willows Academy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fingrmouse -- Fingrmouse (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Bill Bowman (Scottish politician) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RRD (talk) 03:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Carlton le Willows Academy you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Carlton le Willows Academy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fingrmouse -- Fingrmouse (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Carlton le Willows Academy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kenirwin/(talk) 15:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

valereee (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Curlymanjaro, it has been two and a half weeks, and the nomination has still not been transcluded. Further, it is not long enough to qualify as a DYK: the absolutely minimum is 1500 prose characters, and this is only 1266 prose characters. If you wish to pursue this nomination, you'll need to transclude it (or request help for doing so), and also do more work on the article to get it up above minimum length. I hope you do both of these soon, but if not, the nomination could be removed or closed. Thank you for your attention. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Golden Link you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article The Golden Link you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:The Golden Link for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 16:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:06, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Professor Popper's Problem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Professor Popper's Problem you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Professor Popper's Problem for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carlton Town F.C. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Carlton Town F.C. you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Carlton Town F.C. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 05:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you today for Carlton Town F.C., "about Carlton Town Football Club, a small Nottinghamshire team competing at the eighth tier of the English football pyramid"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm awaiting a QPQ for the DYK nomination of Carlton Town F.C. It can't pass without one. Please supply one soon and ping me when you do. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 31 August 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 30, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gedling Town F.C. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Brindille1 -- Brindille1 (talk) 18:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Gedling Town F.C. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gedling Town F.C. and Talk:Gedling Town F.C./GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Brindille1 -- Brindille1 (talk) 03:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Gedling Town F.C. you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Gedling Town F.C. for comments about the article, and Talk:Gedling Town F.C./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Brindille1 -- Brindille1 (talk) 00:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Gedling Town F.C. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 12 November 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 19:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply