Aaronhumes

• expand Economy of Belize

Why did you revert my moves from "Belize ..." to "Belizean ..."? The adjective most certainly is "Belizean", so the articles should be at "Belizean general election, 2008", not "Belize ...". —Nightstallion (?) 14:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

My bad. But I don't think I did this. I was trying to edit the article. Go ahead and revert, I have no objections.--Aaronhumes 15:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

You haven't responded to my statement. If you will kindly check the articles in question they have been restored to Belizean. Thanks and happy editing!--Aaronhumes 22:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fascinating new article on the Family Feud broadcast history. My brother, father, wife, former brother-in-law and sister-in-law played with Ray Combs in '89. They won two games but, sadly, not the big money. I met Ray briefly as well as some of the Goodson-Todman crew. Wonderful folks all. I was deeply saddened at Combs' passing since he treated my wife particularly nice. He had played a joke on her by tweaking her nose on camera; she got him back later with a terrific tweak of her own which brought down the house...but which didn't make it to air. Wonderful memory. - Lucky 6.9 04:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The split you did to Family Feud was not the idea we wanted. You did your best, but someone put {{merge}} there because that person disagreed with your decision. How about this I mentioned in Talk:Family Feud: "around the world" (you did that already), "Combs", "Dawson", "Fremantle", etc. --Gh87 18:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Been intending to respond to the Family Feud situation. The separation I made could be described as temporary: If other contributors would like to flesh out those, fine. "Around the World" and "In Popular Culture" can stand by themselves, but I'll work on restoring "Rules and Production" and a more fleshed out broadcast history back to main article. To previous writer before GH87, thanks! (I am a Feud fan, by the way; watched all episodes save the Dawson return)--Aaronhumes 21:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Aaron, I came across Cross Country Cycling Classic. The article is well fleshed out but lacks sources / verification. Seems you're a keen contributor so thought I'd ask if you could bring the article in line with content policies? Cheers, Deizio talk 02:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem. My main sources were a retrospective magazine published by the local Cycling Association before the 2005 race (cannot locate my copy right now though) and an Amanadala article for the origins. As soon as I find them they go in.--Aaronhumes 21:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sources are in.--Aaronhumes 15:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

An editor has nominated Bliss School of Nursing, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bliss School of Nursing and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on New York, New York (Ja Rule song)/Temp, by Es-won (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because New York, New York (Ja Rule song)/Temp fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting New York, New York (Ja Rule song)/Temp, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Albert, Belize page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 02:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why did you delete the lyrics to Land of the Free? Is there some issue with the posting of these lyrics? If so, please discuss them on the talk page. Notmyrealname 17:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

They were already posted, there was no need to repeat them.--Aaronhumes 17:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I must have been temporarily blinded from too much moonshine. Notmyrealname 15:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

No worries.--Aaronhumes 02:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading Image:Cadine Pics 018.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Logo header.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Amandala header.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Amandala header 2007.jpg. The copy called Image:Amandala header 2007.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 04:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 02:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 03:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 21:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 23:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article FM 2000, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Semitransgenic (talk) 18:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Aaron,

Do you currently live in Belize or the USA? I was wondering if you would be able to find the results by electoral division for the Belize 1998 and 1979 elections. I've been compiling the results for all elections from 1979 to the present. 1979 because that legislature was still in office through independence. GBC (talk) 12:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I could, they are fairly easy to find.--Aaronhumes (talk) 21:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The article The National Perspective has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking somewhat in any content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 08:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Logo header.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:08, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Aaronhumes! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 333 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Corinth Morter Lewis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR �� TWL
2. Erwin X - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Juan Vildo Marin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Kalilah Enríquez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Evan "Mose" Hyde - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Harold Lederman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. John Avery (journalist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Category:NTUCB affiliates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:National Trade Union Congress of Belize affiliates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Super League of Belize has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

As I've pointed out at the TFD discussion, its effectively been deprecated in favour of Template:Belize Super League - Chrism would like to hear from you 18:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Do you still edit on here, if so can I talk to you about Football in Belize. My WP name is Footballfollower89. 16 December 2010.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article News 5 (Belize) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/News 5 (Belize) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 18:03, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Elections and Boundaries Department, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from , and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Elections and Boundaries Department and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Elections and Boundaries Department, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Elections and Boundaries Department with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Elections and Boundaries Department. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Elections and Boundaries Department saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Lihaas (talk) 07:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Million-Dollar Nightmare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Million-Dollar Nightmare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:42, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International versions of Family Feud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International versions of Family Feud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 02:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

The article Duets (Belize) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obscure television show with no reliable sources at all to be found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 18:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article Juni and Luga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional television characters with no notability mentioned, unreferenced and written in universe style also

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Belize Super League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article The San Pedro Daily has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet the notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kaldari (talk) 20:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Amandala header.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Amandala September 6 2007.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Belize Telemedia Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Pre–university of Belize tertiary-level institutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not a notable synthesis of institutions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Diegos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Diegos (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Steve Castillo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has 3 tags, 1 noting unsourced since 2006; content can be summarized at Noh Matta Wat!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Another Believer _(Talk) 00:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Actors in Noh Matta Wat! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Grouping together non-notable actors does not make them notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Caye Caulker Chronicles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Hanging Curve requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unremarkable novel by a non-notable author with no sources since at least 2008

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. User:Namiba 13:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article RSV Media Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No footnotes and no indication of notability for this company. Does not pass WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply