Merge
editI'd say this article and th-debuccalization should be merged into alterations in the pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩. Those two articles are stubs. Very short articles. th-fronting and th-stopping are long enough for their own articles, but these two should be merged. Fish567 (talk) 23:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with that. Peter238 (talk) 04:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, although preferably not into alterations in the pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩, but simply into Pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩, which is an article that already exists and could easily accommodate this extra detail. It would look a bit silly and unnecessary to have two articles alongside each other basically covering the exact same topic. W. P. Uzer (talk) 08:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Okay no objections so I'm merging the articles. I'll redirect alterations in the pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩ to Pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩. Fish567 (talk) 01:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, although preferably not into alterations in the pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩, but simply into Pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩, which is an article that already exists and could easily accommodate this extra detail. It would look a bit silly and unnecessary to have two articles alongside each other basically covering the exact same topic. W. P. Uzer (talk) 08:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)