Talk:Siege of Jülich (1621–1622)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Sandstein in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Possible copyright violation
editThe first two paragraphs of the first section are a copy paste from Wilson book.Dove (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved as suggested. Sandstein 20:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Siege of Jülich → Siege of Jülich (1621–1622) – This siege was not the only siege of Jülich. There was the Siege of Jülich (1610). 86.97.186.109 (talk) 08:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- This sounds OK, but if the redirect is to go to this article, I suppose we need a hat note, which is not there yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support: Pretty straightforward. I have added hatnotes to both articles. Skinsmoke (talk) 09:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm fine with the move if others approve but there should not be a disambiguation page created (per WP:TWODABS). User:Skinsmoke's hatnotes work fine. — AjaxSmack 04:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.