Article (edit | visual edit | history ) · Article talk (edit | history ) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs ) 23:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
Nominator: — Rod talk
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD :
Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section : Done
Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE ): Done
Check for Introductory text : Done
Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO ): Done
Check for Relative emphasis : Done
Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN ): Done
Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE ): Done
Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE ): Done
Check for Proper names and titles : Done
Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN ): None
Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG ): None
Check for Pronunciation : None
Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK ): Done
Check for Biographies : NA
Check for Organisms : NA
Check for Biographies of living persons : NA
Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT ): Done
Check for Non-English titles :
Check for Usage in first sentence :
Check for Separate section usage :
Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH ): Done
Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER ): None
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT : Done
Check for Body sections : WP:BODY , MOS:BODY . Done
Check for Headings and sections : Done
Check for Section templates and summary style : Done
Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS ): Done
Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX ): Done
Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER ): Done
Check for Works or publications : Done
Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO ): Done
Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR ): Done
Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER ): Done
Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL ): Done
Check for Links to sister projects : Done
Check for Navigation templates : Done
Check for Formatting : Done
Check for Images (WP:LAYIM ): Done
Check for Links : Done
Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE ): Done
Done
Check for WP:WTW : Done
Check for Words that may introduce bias : Done
Check for Puffery (WP:PEA ): Done
Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL ): Done
Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL ): Done
Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED ): Done
Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED ): Done
Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY ): Done
Check for Expressions that lack precision : Done
Check for Offensive material (WP:F*** ): Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT : Done
Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world ): Done
Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI ): Done
Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT ): Done
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS : Done
Cross-checked with other FAs: Chew Valley Lake , Chew Valley , Mendip Hills , Buildings and architecture of Bristol , Chew Stoke , Exmoor , Somerset , Bath, Somerset , River Parrett , Kennet and Avon Canal
Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING ): (not contentious ) Done
Is it contentious?: No
Does the ref indeed support the material?:
Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING ): Done
Who is the author?:
Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:
What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:
What else has the author published?:
Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:
Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING ): Done
Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS ):
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF : Done
Check for Direct quotations : Done
Check for Likely to be challenged : Done
Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP ): NA
Done
Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY ): Done
Check for synthesis (WP:SYN ): Done
Check for original images (WP:OI ): Done
3: Broad in its coverage
Done
Cross-checked with other FAs: Chew Valley Lake , Chew Valley , Mendip Hills , Buildings and architecture of Bristol , Chew Stoke , Exmoor , Somerset , Bath, Somerset , River Parrett , Kennet and Avon Canal
Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources :
Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS :
Check for Out of scope :
Check for The range of material that belongs in the article :
Check for All material that is notable is covered :
Check for All material that is referenced is covered :
Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered :
Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge :
Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC ):
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
Check for POV (WP:YESPOV ): Done
Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING ): Done
Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE ): Done
Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE ): Done
Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS ): Done
Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID ): Done
Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV ): Done
Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL ): Done
Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE ): Done
Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV ): Done
Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV ): Done
Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI ): None
Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV ): None
5: Stable: No edit wars , etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD )
I'm glad to see your work here. As per the above checklist, I do have some insights that I think will be useful in improving the article. Can you provide inline citations for the following?
"Only the older parts of the house are open to the public." .
"The Jenners had a garden staff of four." .
"The main border is 35 metres (114.8 ft) long and at its best in midsummer. The flowers grade from blues and yellows, through creams and apricots to pinks, mauves and reds. There is a restful White Garden beyond for contrast." .
"It is a plain grassed walkway connecting the Raised Walk with the Pond Garden." .
Is it possible to move inline citations in the Paintings subsection to the end of the sentences? They are inhibiting the flow.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Rod, please feel free to strike out any recommendation you think will not help in improving the article. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
Thanks. I have added and moved references as suggested.— Rod talk 18:23, 28 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
Thanks --Seabuckthorn ♥ 21:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 21:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC) Reply