Talk:Implicit stereotype

Strangely, the article doesn't mention that men are overall seen much more negatively than women and that women are more "sexist" (preferring women to men more strongly than men). Instead it mentions several stereotypes that evaluates women less favorably. I just finished reading the book Blindspot (by the IAT fellows from Harvard) and in the book I found the same omission, as if the facts weren't right and had to be hidden. It was so strange that I had to do some googling. It showed that other studies had found out this different reality. http://survey.buyologyinc.com/latency_white_paper.pdf p. 653- (I won't write anything myself because my English isn't up to the standards.)

Hi there, that article refers to an implicit attitude, and could be incorporated into the implicit attitude page, but isn't appropriate here. I don't think it's so much that they are hiding the facts, I think it is more likely that the stereotypes reported in Blindspot have been replicated very well, and i'm not sure if that gender attitude reported in the paper you linked replicates (but please link to any other articles you find that elaborate on this result!) I am also not sure what you mean that men are seen much more "negatively;" it seems like the bulk of the research points to men being stereotyped (implicitly or otherwise) as more capable, intelligent, etc. But please link to research that shows otherwise! Psy463 1029 (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

The gender part of this article should be at the very least reviewed, if not completely rewritten, with less biased sources used preferably. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bumblebritches57 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

The fact is most implicit stereotypes that have been investigated about gender yield results that feel pro-male, because men are stereotypically associated with power, strength, and intelligence. It's possible they might also be associated with negative stereotypes (maybe women are seen as more capable caregivers?) but I haven't found any studies that investigated stereotypes like those. I'll keep looking for papers, and definitely link to any you can find here!Psy463 1029 (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Could everyone please compromise on an introduction to this topic that allows the novice reader such as me to actually try and understand what the title means. Obviously it's a contentious area but this is all so confusing I can't even begin to understand it. I have no preconceptions on the topic, I came across it and looked it up to try and understand what the term meant or could mean. This page was hopeless.

Please work out what you can all agree on, write that and then proceed to set out the diverging views. Regards, me, a noob, who still doesn't understand this term and now needs to go elsewhere.131.111.184.3 (talk) 15:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

It seems like this article could us a discrete section on anti-implicit bias training and/or other methods to reduce implicit bias. Here is one source which would be good for this: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/15/nyregion/bias-training-police.html . I don't have time to work on this right now, but assuming no one else does this or argues convincingly against this, I'll try to work on a section before too long. -Pengortm (talk) 02:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acem.13214 - suggests from a meta-analysis that "The current literature indicates that although many physicians, regardless of specialty, demonstrate an implicit preference for white people, this bias does not appear to impact their clinical decision making."

and http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/12/iat-behavior-problem.html

and https://www.apa.org/monitor/2008/07-08/psychometric

Again, I hope to add these at some point when I get time unless someone hopefully beats me to it. -Pengortm (talk) 23:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Summaries at the end of articles are not used in Wikipedia and the quality of this particular summary seems low at that.--Thorseth (talk) 13:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The concept of implicit bias and implicit stereotypes have paved the way for tidal wave of "academic research" on the subject. From a non-political stance, what it boils down to is simply that people use their "intuition" to make decisions, ranging from what store to buy fruits and vegetables from, to who to be friends with. Implicit bias has been encoded to mean anything having to do with a movement to try to shame people into believing what "woke" members of a social justice group would like them to believe. It is unclear to me how to get these facts in the article without getting them deleted. Maybe someone can advise me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darwinizer (talk • contribs) 04:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:TRUTH. Generalrelative (talk) 06:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

While I'm not a professional in this topic, I have always heard this topic referenced as implicit bias, never implicit stereotype. I agree with the title of this page, but when I tried to search implicit bias, I didn't get anything like that. Maybe professionals working on this topic call it implicit stereotype, but it's really confusing trying to search implicit bias and having to click on implicit stereotype. Movablepan (talk) 03:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply