Talk:IMEC

Latest comment: 22 days ago by Davidships in topic Spelling

Spelling

edit

Shouldn't this be IMEC? It's an acronym, like NATO, not a word, and they spell it IMEC (all caps) on their website (except when, for apparently stylistic purposes, they spell it imec in all smalls). Ehusman 02:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Alas, it looks to me like they spell it as 'imec" in the middle of sentences, "Imec" at the start of a sentence, and "IMEC" only in headlines that are all capital letters. Too late I suppose to move it back? W Nowicki (talk) 23:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I changed the page to "imec" since this is the commonly used name and this is what they use on their website.
Galgalesh (talk) 11:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's a marketing strategy to harmonise with the logo, which is in lowercase. It should be an acronym, in my view. Jondvdsn1 (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
The Wikipedia Manual of Style (particularly, MOS:TMRULES) states Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization practices, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official", as long as this is a style already in widespread use, Capitalize GEICO, IBM, as acronyms/initialisms. So unless a significant amount of secondary sources out there refer to them by "Imec" or "imec", IMEC should be capitalised in all upper-case here. — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Most secondary sources capitalize it as "Imec" and "imec"
Well, here I found at least six websites that capitalise it as 'IMEC': [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
The main issue I see with the lowercase capitalisation is it looks 'awkward' and out-of-place in text, and introduces reading difficulties as it is not clear right away if it's some word or if it's an acronym. The full uppercase capitalisation makes it obvious, without a doubt, that it is an acronym.
Also, following the company's own branding guidelines exclusively gives Wikipedia a kind of 'corporate' look to it, as if it's sponsored by the company or something. Using the Wikipedia styling standard (MoS) gives the articles a neutral tone here.
So yeah I'm actually strongly against the lowercase capitalisation. — AP 499D25 (talk) 14:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is the official internal imec policy on the name:
"The name Interuniversity Microelectronics Center is only used when the legal name is required. In all other cases, use imec."
"On legal documents, i.e., contracts, invoices, purchase orders,... the official name(s) will be used, as well as the legal form of the company; e.g., IMEC vzw, IMEC Taiwan Co."
"Spelling:
In a sentence, imec is written in lowercase.
At the beginning of a sentence, imec starts with a capital: Imec.
When everything is in capitals, imec should also be in capitals: IMEC." 2A02:A020:382:C0B6:CD14:C477:A0E:B874 (talk) 09:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Once again, from the MOS:TMRULES section of the Wikipedia Manual of Style: Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization practices, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official". A company's own policy about how it capitalises its brand name does not overrule Wikipedia's style guidelines. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Since it's an acronym, all-caps IMEC makes most sense. Gawaon (talk) 08:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Agree that standard capitalisation is clearly the MOS preferred style - just as we do not have a flowing script for Kellogg's. As it happens, IMEC is also how the different affiliates are officially styled, as noted above. The official internal policy on how the company currently chooses to style itself is something that can be noted in the article itself. - Davidships (talk) 22:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
edit

The text in the article is in large parts similar to the text here. I am not certain whether this is a copyright infringement or not. Please check and act as needed. I usually work on the German Wikipedia, so I do not have an account here. Greetings --Nfreaker91 18:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Not only copyright violation, but a bad article style too. Still needs fixing, although that URL is now dead. http://www2.imec.be/be_en/about-imec/company-profile.html looks similar now. W Nowicki (talk) 23:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

start-ups

edit

Imec has had some success with start-ups, spawning Co-Ware, now a significant EDA company, FillFactory which was sold to Cypress Semiconductor for $100m, Sirius Communications and Target Compiler Technologies. Over 20 years it has seen a 22 per cent return on its start-up investments.

http://www.electronicsweekly.com/Articles/2006/05/17/38671/incubator-to-send-start-ups-on-us-visit.htm

Royzee (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply