Talk:Grafton, New South Wales
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWhat was wrong with my definition? (Red-neck little hick town on the north coast of New South Wales Australia. Avoid at all costs.) Seems pretty accurate to me, since I used to live there.
- So is "red-neck little hick town" what "cathedral town" means?? Maudlingothic 05:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- People will confuse that with the definition of Adelaide, being a red-neck medium-sized hick town... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.84.51 (talk) 10:22, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I used to live there as well. The widespread use of sunscreen seems to have done wonders for the local inhabitants, not a red neck to be seen last time I was there!Ticklemygrits 06:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
I still Live here...well not here ....."down river" .....the list of schools need extending Ben920 12:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grafton, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100406065527/http://www.samuseum.australia.sa.com/tindaletribes/badjalang.htm to http://www.samuseum.australia.sa.com/tindaletribes/badjalang.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Notable People
editSince not everyone on this list was actually born in Grafton, I have changed it to 'Notable Residents' and added a couple who thereby qualify. Bluedawe 03:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
For the mosque shooter stuff, see: Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board#Christchurch_mosque_shootings WhisperToMe (talk) 02:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Brenton Tarrant
editI've noticed on this page there has been a lot of back and forth between adding and removing Christchurch shooter Brenton Harrison Tarrant from the "Notable People" section of this page. Just because he's a bad person doesn't mean he shouldn't be there; he's still highly notable, for better or for worse. But there seems to be a different reason he keeps getting removed that I am not aware of, if someone could reply and tell me what that is that would be great. There is an explanation on the topic above this, the one that says "For the mosque shooter stuff", but the link doesn't work. Thanks. Plectiscus (talk) 21:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- His name is not needed here. See this. Alexeyevitch(talk) 21:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- That discussion is kind of confusing, but from what I took away the reason he is not on this page is because he doesn't have his own independent page and thus his name isn't notable enough, correct? Plectiscus (talk) 22:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t believe you have good faith intentions with this suggestion considering the fact you attempted to add a photo of that mass killer to your profile page a while ago( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Plectiscus&diff=prev&oldid=1208803573) for no clear reason and nearly all your edits appear to be about mass murderers. 2600:100E:B0C4:A9CB:B4AC:FB90:4872:EB12 (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- lol ok and? Is that illegal? Plectiscus (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- When did I ever say that was illegal? Just saying that you have a clear bias of why you want to unnecessarily add him in this article. 2600:100E:B0C4:A9CB:B4AC:FB90:4872:EB12 (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's not unnecessary, he is from Grafton and thus it makes sense to add him. You're the one being biased by not wanting to add him because he has a bad reputation, which violates WP:Wikipedia is not censored. However, as I was discussing with the gentleman above this, there is a different reason for not adding him in that he is not considered notable since he doesn't have his own page, a reason which I was not previously aware of. Plectiscus (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is unnecessary because, as others have said, he does not fit the criteria for “notable people” 2600:100E:B073:6FD7:884E:535C:CB6D:2D27 (talk) 16:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- As I just said, I am now aware of that however previously I was not, that's why I created this topic. Plectiscus (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is unnecessary because, as others have said, he does not fit the criteria for “notable people” 2600:100E:B073:6FD7:884E:535C:CB6D:2D27 (talk) 16:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's not unnecessary, he is from Grafton and thus it makes sense to add him. You're the one being biased by not wanting to add him because he has a bad reputation, which violates WP:Wikipedia is not censored. However, as I was discussing with the gentleman above this, there is a different reason for not adding him in that he is not considered notable since he doesn't have his own page, a reason which I was not previously aware of. Plectiscus (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- When did I ever say that was illegal? Just saying that you have a clear bias of why you want to unnecessarily add him in this article. 2600:100E:B0C4:A9CB:B4AC:FB90:4872:EB12 (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- lol ok and? Is that illegal? Plectiscus (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)