Talk:Fruit Ninja: Puss in Boots
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Namcokid47 in topic Merger proposed
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Merger proposed
editThis was a shortly avaliable app, and it was poorly notable. This should probably be merged into Fruit Ninja as it is poorly notable, it has issues, and it was a short-lived app. MrCoolGuy159 (talk) 23:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per WP:NTEMP, notability isn't temporary. I have found lots of reliable sources that discuss the game: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11], [12]. Passes WP:GNG easily. Will try to improve the article soon. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - I think you’re confusing “poor quality” with “notability”. It appears to be a garbage game. But that doesn’t change the fact that reliable sources covered it in significant detail. Sergecross73 msg me 19:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - The overall page quality is not a factor for deletion. As from what Jovanmilic posted, it's clearly been covered extensively by reliable sources, so I fail to see how it isn't notable (in fact, you seem to confuse "notability" with "quality", per Sergecross' response). Namcokid47 (Contribs) 21:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)