Talk:Ferdinand Blumentritt

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Johlet in topic Copyright violations removed
edit

I have today removed material taken verbatim from three parts of a copyrighted source:

The copyright-marked material on that website would, itself, appear to be a copyright violation of this book. Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

There is no copyright violation. In 1995 we got the written permission by the author Harry Sichrovsky and the publisher "Oesterreichischer Bundesverlag". However, the Austrian-Philippine Website is not maintained any longer.

Some errors in the Wikipedia entry about Blumentritt:

1) Blumentritt never translated Rizals "Noli me tangere", only a very few pages.

2) He was definitely no nephew of the Hungarian German writer Ferenc Virághalmi. There might be a more distant relationship. I would recommend to remove this passage.

Johann Stockinger — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johlet (talkcontribs) 18:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Main Works

edit

I am restoring the Main Works section, as is just a list and cannot constitute a copyright infringement

--RafaelMinuesa (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ferdinand Blumentritt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply