Wikipedia

Talk:Engine power

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A02:A58:843B:A900:A5D0:F0F1:F2EC:4818 in topic Energy or Work rate is misleadingly named Power

Since this article is on "Engine Power," shouldn't the tables all be power-to-weight ratio of the *engine*, not the vehicle? Otherwise this should be combined with the "Power-to-weight ratio" article.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A58:843B:A900:A5D0:F0F1:F2EC:4818 (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 25 external links on Engine power. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Engine power. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Vague Page

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How can this be a page on "Engine Power" when all one can see are tables on Power-to-weight ratio figures? There are no talks of types of engine, BSFC, MEP, Thermal efficiency etc. I suggest these tables be merged with those of Power-to-weight ratio & this page be scrapped until someone comes up with sufficient information. Daimler Ben (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge or clarify title

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is already a good technical article on horsepower; as noted above, this is a really a list of engines. It needs to be renamed or incorporated into other articles such as Power-to-weight ratio. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 15:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I agree, this article is pretty much just a vague "something" with a giant list. The article lacks a useful explanation what the subject is. Considering that engine power and "regular" power are both the same ( L·M2·T−3), I'd say there is no difference. I suggest a redirect to Power (physics). What do you think, phoebe? --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 12:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup required

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is basically just a list of motley examples, and it lacks even a very basic explanation of the topic. I suggest removing most of the examples, and turning this article into what I'd call a "reasonable stub". --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC) PS: Many of the external links are dead. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Energy or Work rate is misleadingly named Power

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Power is sinonimous to force in common languages. Therefore it is named to misslead people. It should be called "energy or work rate" (at which the energy is transformed into force). The fluid's flow doesn't have a simmilar unrelated definition. More details in this publication: [https://marius-ciclistu.ro/pdf/The%20power%E2%80%99s%20mislead%20in%20thermal%20engine%E2%80%99s%20regard.pdf Power is a denatured mirroring of force and acceleration in thermal engines' regard.] Marius Pantea feb.2017 2A02:A58:843B:A900:A5D0:F0F1:F2EC:4818 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Engine_power&oldid=1201763523"