Talk:ConservAmerica

Does REP support the goal of returning to 350 ppm (as it was in the 1980's) CO₂ in the atmosphere? 350.org 99.35.10.191 (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

How does R.E.P. stand on Climate change denial currently? 99.102.179.197 (talk) 22:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

This page is worth watching. Editors must be suspicious of those who make an appearance to hack information out of pages they've never worked on before and who peddle their self-proclaimed expertise on Wikipedia - including self-aggrandizing books that amount to nothing more than entrepreneurial endeavors. Watch this page carefully, please.

---
  /
 /
---

--ElZorroChapin (talk) 16:34, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the "heads up"! I'll definitely keep an eye out for problem editors, while trying, of course, to assume good faith! -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ConservAmerica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100525024412/http://www.rep.org/scorecard.html to http://www.rep.org/scorecard.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I deleted the claim that ConservAmerica endorsed Pruitt to head the EPA. Feel free to add back in if there are credible sources.

The article that was cited didn't say anything about ConservAmerica. I did a little googling and didn't find anything saying ConservAmerica has endorsed Pruitt. The official list of endorsements on the CA website doesn't mention him. I found one news article saying that a person who is on the board of CA has praised Pruitt, but that would not count as an official endorsement from the organization.

@Fagles:Thanks for your input. You forgot to sign your comments, but you could add your USER name afterward. I've done the same at least a couple of times. I found about eight news articles saying that ConservAmerica Board Member Nan Hayworth strongly supported Pruitt's appointment. But I also found these claims at the Confirm Scott Pruitt website.

ConservAmerica, A Conservative Conservation Group, Said Pruitt’s Nomination “Signals A Return To The Original Mission Of The EPA.” “ConservAmerica believes that the nomination of Mr. Pruitt signals a return to the original mission of the EPA – as America’s federal enforcement agency on environmental laws – and a pivot away from the EPA as a policy making tool of the Executive Branch.” (ConservAmerica, “Statement On Nomination Of Scott Pruitt To Head EPA,” Press Release, 12/8/16)

ConservAmerica Also “Praised Mr. Pruitt’s Commitment To The Reality That States Have Different Situations.” “In particular, ConservAmerica praised Mr. Pruitt’s commitment to the reality that states have different situations: ‘Every state has dramatically different issues and electric generation fleets,’ explained Mr. Sisson. ‘In several states, for example, the wind production tax credit – which has fueled the expansion of a valuable zero emissions resource – has inadvertently imperiled the continuing operation of nuclear plants, America’s only zero emissions source of baseload power.’” (ConservAmerica, “Statement On Nomination Of Scott Pruitt To Head EPA,” Press Release, 12/8/16)

ConservAmerica: “Pruitt’s Record Indicates That He Understands The Need To Enforce The Law Without Jeopardizing People’s Utility Rates.” “Mr. Sisson stated that ConservAmerica believes that ‘to successfully reduce emissions and address climate change, we have to have solutions that don’t throw the market into chaos – Mr. Pruitt’s record indicates that he understands the need to enforce the law without jeopardizing people’s utility rates and without pitting one zero emissions resource against another.’” (ConservAmerica, “Statement On Nomination Of Scott Pruitt To Head EPA,” Press Release, 12/8/16)^[1] Activist (talk) 10:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ConservAmerica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090905162421/http://www.rep.org/opinions/op-eds/129.html to http://www.rep.org/opinions/op-eds/129.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718064005/http://www.rep.org/opinions/op-eds/137.html to http://www.rep.org/opinions/op-eds/137.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219194417/http://www.rep.org/opinions/weblog/weblog10-10-11.html to http://www.rep.org/opinions/weblog/weblog10-10-11.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply