Talk:Adalia bipunctata

"When [the bacterium] ends up in a male, it will die when the male dies. Therefore, it kills most of the male embryos in the newly laid eggs."

Wherefore "therefore"? That the bacterium dies when the male dies wouldn't naturally lead to males' death before hatching. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cognita (talk • contribs) 04:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have what I think is a better photo: http://s641.photobucket.com/albums/uu134/OhLook/?action=view&current=2spot-ladybug.jpg

Assuming anyone else agrees, how would I go about donating it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cognita (talk • contribs) 04:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

This creature is randomly refered to as a ladybird, ladybird beetle, lady beetle and ladybug throughout the article. We really ought to settle on just one name (and mention its aliases at the start). The oldest version of the article uses both "lady beetle" and "ladybird". (My personal preference, being British, is "ladybird", and the original version seems to be in Commonwealth English, so that would probably be the most appropriate). In any case, I'll make sure all version of the name are listed in the introduction, and will sort out a standard name later, unless someone else beats me to it. Wardog (talk) 09:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Further to that, is it normally known as two-spotted or two-spot? In my experience, it's normally the latter, although that may be a regional or national quirk. This BBC article uses two-spot. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13675732 Wardog (talk) 09:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hence a good thing it is listed at its scientific name...Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adalia bipunctata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614151227/http://www.enature.com/fieldguides/detail.asp?recnum=IS0016 to http://www.enature.com/fieldguides/detail.asp?recnum=IS0016

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply