Talk:2023 Brovary helicopter crash

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mellohi! in topic Requested move 22 January 2023


To add to article

edit

Basic information to add to this article: the cause of the crash. If there was fog at the time of the crash, why not mention that? 204.11.186.190 (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done by someone. Ref (chew)(do) 09:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Can anybody find sources non paid subscription?

edit

There are 2 sources in the article, and those 2 sources are subscription only. I've tried to look, but couldn't find any alternatives. Can anbody find a replacement for them? Enter Demoman (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Reuters and the CNN articles subscription free Caspian Delta (talk) 04:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
There are in fact 15 sources in the article, some used multiple times. But I'm not sure that the two you mention ([5] and [9]) are actually needed. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 10:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 22 January 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


2023 Brovary helicopter crashBrovary helicopter crash – Unnecessary disambiguation. There are no other 'Brovary helicopter crash' articles from other years. Compusolus (talk) 08:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Compusolus (talk) 09:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Reply

S̶u̶p̶p̶o̶r̶t̶: Oppose: Like the examples for Flight Number 1 in 1936, 1941, and 1962, still put the date in there, it makes more sense and would be useful in the future. ☭MasterWolf-Æthelwulf☭ (talk). 00:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
'S̶u̶p̶p̶o̶r̶t̶: Oppose That Prussian1872 (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oppose: Not that i hope another helicopter crashes at the same place, but just in case, i think we should continue to show the year. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 13:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

copied from RM/TR – robertsky (talk) 15:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.