The tribe Caesalpinieae is one of the subdivisions of the plant family Fabaceae: subfamily Caesalpinioideae.[1]

Caesalpinieae
Caesalpinia sappan
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Clade: Rosids
Order: Fabales
Family: Fabaceae
Subfamily: Caesalpinioideae
Tribe: Caesalpinieae
Rchb. 1832
Type genus
Caesalpinia
(L. 1753) E. Gagnon & G. P. Lewis 2016
Genera

See text.

Synonyms
  • Ceratonieae Rchb. 1832
  • Dimorphandreae Benth. 1840
  • Sclerolobieae Benth. 1865
  • Moreae Britton & Rose 1930

Genera

edit

Caesalpinieae once included many more genera, but modern molecular phylogenetics indicated that these should be transferred to other clades.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Caesalpinieae currently comprises the following genera:[9]

Phylogenetics

edit

Caesalpinia, as traditionally circumscribed, was paraphyletic, so it was recently recircumscribed to produce many new genera:[9]

Caesalpinioideae

Notes

edit
  1. ^ There is some evidence (see [9]) that Ticanto Adans. 1763 might be a valid genus, but it has not yet been formally reinstated as such.

References

edit
  1. ^ The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG). (2017). "A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny". Taxon. 66 (1): 44–77. doi:10.12705/661.3. hdl:10568/90658.
  2. ^ Bruneau A, Forest F, Herendeen PS, Klitgaard BB, Lewis GP (2001). "Phylogenetic Relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as Inferred from Chloroplast trnL Intron Sequences". Syst Bot. 26 (3): 487–514. doi:10.1043/0363-6445-26.3.487 (inactive 1 November 2024).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  3. ^ Bruneau A, Mercure M, Lewis GP, Herendeen PS (2008). "Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes". Botany. 86 (7): 697–718. doi:10.1139/B08-058.
  4. ^ Cardoso D, Pennington RT, de Queiroz LP, Boatwright JS, Van Wykd B-E, Wojciechowskie MF, Lavin M (2013). "Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes". S Afr J Bot. 89: 58–75. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.05.001. hdl:10566/3193.
  5. ^ Babineau M, Gagnon E, Bruneau A (2013). "Phylogenetic utility of 19 low copy nuclear genes in closely related genera and species of caesalpinioid legumes". S Afr J Bot. 89: 94–105. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.06.018.
  6. ^ Nores MJ, Simpson BB, Hick P, Anton AM, Fortunato RH (2012). "The phylogenetic relationships of four monospecific caesalpinioids (Leguminosae) endemic to southern South America". Taxon. 61 (4): 790–802. doi:10.1002/tax.614006.
  7. ^ Gagnon E, Lewis GP, Solange Sotuyo J, Hughes CE, Bruneau A (2013). "A molecular phylogeny of Caesalpinia sensu lato: Increased sampling reveals new insights and more genera than expected". S Afr J Bot. 89: 111–127. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.07.027.
  8. ^ Manzanilla V, Bruneau A (2012). "Phylogeny reconstruction in the Caesalpinieae grade (Leguminosae) based on duplicated copies of the sucrose synthase gene and plastid markers". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 65 (1): 149–162. Bibcode:2012MolPE..65..149M. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.035. PMID 22699157.
  9. ^ a b c Gagnon E, Bruneau A, Hughes CE, de Queiroz LP, Lewis GP (2016). "A new generic system for the pantropical Caesalpinia group (Leguminosae)". PhytoKeys (71): 1–160. doi:10.3897/phytokeys.71.9203. PMC 5558824. PMID 28814915.
  10. ^ "Ticanto Adans. | Plants of the World Online | Kew Science".
edit