Aircraft bridges, including taxiway bridges and runway bridges, bring aircraft traffic over motorways, railways, and waterways.

Aircraft bridge over Swedish county road 273 [sv] at Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Sweden
Aircraft bridge over the Main Canal [nl] at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, the Netherlands

Construction

edit

Aircraft bridges must be designed to support the heaviest aircraft that may cross them, or that will cross them in the future. In 1963, a taxiway bridge at O'Hare International Airport, one of the busiest airports in the world, was planned to handle future aircraft weighing 365,000 pounds (166,000 kg), but aircraft weights doubled within two years of its construction.[1] Currently, the largest passenger aircraft in the world, the Airbus A380, has a maximum take-off weight (MTOW) of 575 t (1,268,000 lb).

The largest Boeing planes, i.e. the current "Project Ozark" versions of the Boeing 747-8, are approaching MTOW of greater than 1,000,000 lb (450,000 kg). Aircraft bridges must be designed for the substantial forces exerted by aircraft braking, affecting the lateral load in substructure design.[2] Braking force of 70 percent of the live load is assumed in two recent taxiway bridge designs.[2][3] And "deck design is more apt to be controlled by punching shear than flexure due to the heavy wheel loads."[2]

Taxiway bridges are unusually wide relative to their length, and aircraft loading cannot be assumed to be distributed evenly to a bridge superstructure's web, so different modeling is required in these bridges' structural design.[4]: 2–3  In cold climates, provisions for anti-icing must be made. In the U.S., regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration must be met.[2][5] And there are various other differences versus typical bridges covered by AASHTO standards.[6]

A major issue is that closing an airport for construction even temporarily is impossible.

Major alternatives considered for construction of a taxiway bridge in 2008 were:

  • use of precast, prestressed concrete I-girders
  • use of precast, prestressed concrete box girders
  • use of steel girders
  • cast-in-place, post-tensioned concrete box girder bridge.[2]

Finite Element Analysis has been advocated for, or applied in, taxiway bridge design since at least 1963.[7]

edit
 
Kai Tak Tunnel east entrance, near the old Kai Tak airport

Taxiway bridges and runway bridges are bridges at airports to bring airplane taxiways and runways across motorways, railroads, or waterways. A taxiway bridge must be designed to carry the weight of the maximum size airplanes crossing and perhaps stopping directly upon it. A runway bridge is similar but may have different stresses. Alternatively, a motorway may be brought by tunnel underneath one or more runways and taxiways.

Examples include:

References

edit
  1. ^ a b O.C. Guedelhoefer; J.R. Janney (1980). W.R. Schriever (ed.). Evaluation of Performance by Full-Scale Testing. American Society for Testing and Materials. pp. 17–19. ISBN 9780803103689. (book title is Full-Scale Load Testing of Structures)
  2. ^ a b c d e f Ted Bush; Kent Bormann; Rob Turton (Spring 2008). "Airport Bridges Take Off" (PDF). Aspire. Retrieved July 31, 2016.
  3. ^ a b Shane Johnson; Tom Morrison (April 10, 2015). "Design and Construction of Micropiles Supporting Taxiway Bridge" (PDF).
  4. ^ a b Kevin M. Gorak; Troy D. Jessop (Winter 2009). "A New Welcome at the Port Columbus International Airport" (PDF). Aspire: 34–37. Retrieved 17 May 2013. (with 4 pages of additional photos published in the web version)
  5. ^ "Advisory Circular AC 150/5300-13A" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. May 1, 2012.
  6. ^ Anthony N. Mavrogiannis, of Airport Consultants Council, Review Comments on Advisory Circular 150/5300-13, Airport Design Archived 2013-10-21 at the Wayback Machine, see esp. p.3.
  7. ^ Alan R. Jefts (1983). Finite Element Analysis of a Taxiway Bridge. American Society of Civil Engineers. ISBN 9780872623514. in book Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Electronic Computation
  8. ^ Sun Rongmei; Zhang Xianmin. "Dynamic Analysis of the Taxiway Bridge Under Aircraft Moving Load".
  9. ^ "Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System". Retrieved 26 March 2023.
  10. ^ Corrosion Investigation Study of Reinforcing Steel Taxiway Bridge and Spiral Ramps at Chicago-O'Hare International Airport. 1982.
  11. ^ [1] Airport World 1973, vol 6, pages 36-37.
  12. ^ a b c d e Google Maps, accessed July 2016
  13. ^ "Hong Kong International Airport splashes out HK$5 billion on a new midfield... Concourse". April 2016.
  14. ^ "India's first: Elevated taxiway for aircraft at Delhi airport from September". The Times of India. 2023-04-24. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2024-04-07.
  15. ^ Anthony Walker (September 1995). Hong Kong: The Contractors' Experience. p. 89. ISBN 9789622094000.
  16. ^ "Odyssey Books & Guides". Retrieved 26 March 2023.
  17. ^ "NW extension to Runway 13 at Kai Tak [c.1951- ] | Gwulo". gwulo.com. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
  18. ^ "Photos of NW extension to Runway 13 at Kai Tak [c.1951- ] | Gwulo". gwulo.com. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
  19. ^ "Exhibition of archival holdings on Kai Tak Airport (with photos)". www.info.gov.hk. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
  20. ^ "Kai-tak-Airport Image". Retrieved 26 March 2023.
  21. ^ LAX airport diagram, 1956 shows runways 25 and 26 crossing the line of Sepulveda Boulevard (although boulevard is not indicated).
  22. ^ "CASE STUDY REPORT: OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ROADWAY PROJECT" (PDF). Mineta Transportation Institute. Retrieved 2021-01-12.
  23. ^ David A. Burrows (October 2013). "Bridges for Planes, Trains, but not Automobiles". Structure.
  24. ^ Media, Kompas Cyber (10 February 2017). "Bandara Soekarno-Hatta Bangun "East Cross Taxiway" - Kompas.com". Retrieved 18 October 2018.
  25. ^ "Tampa International Airport - Taxiway B Bridge Design-Build. Tampa, Florida". Finley Engineering Group. Archived from the original on 2016-08-27. Retrieved 2016-07-19.
edit

  Media related to Aircraft bridges at Wikimedia Commons

40°00′01″N 82°54′19″W / 40.0002°N 82.9052°W / 40.0002; -82.9052