User talk:Yuriy75

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 11:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I has overlooked to specify the license. Has corrected. Юра Данилевский 11:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Yuriy75!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Мечеть Кул Шариф, 2009.jpg is uncategorized since 1 July 2009.
• Image:Eremias velox, Baikonur 07.jpg was uncategorized on 26 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yuriy75! I requested translation into English to Japanese Wikiepedia's village pump. Thank you. LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 08:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yuriy75! I came from jpwp's village pump, seeing your translation request. I'm not very good at English, and this epitaph to mourning the war dead is difficult to translate, because it is poetry. But first_one means like that:

our fellow soldiers, resting here

fell down with exhaustion

we build this epitaph

to mourn for them

to pray for peace

on friendships and understandings by ケンタウ citizen

year 1993

by veterans association and supporters

I do not know how to spell ケンタウ(KENTAU). But this means city's name (that is probably where you took the photo). And second one is too long for me to translate into English, sorry.--Yghwtrrl (talk) 12:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although I cannot translate second epitaph, I write the text of it. If you use a machine translation, you may understand the meaning of text.

1945年、下第63師団(陣)将兵の一部は、労役のためこの地へ送られ、二ヶ年の後、日本へ帰ったが、内39名は病を得て没し、遂に日本の土を踏むことはできなかった。陣戦友会(one of the organization of veterans association in Japan)は戦友の死を悼み、ケンタウ市の絶大な友好協力のもとに、国内で広く募金を行ない、その浄財をもって1993年この碑を建設したものである。

陣戦友会平和慰霊碑建立委員長 --Yghwtrrl (talk) 13:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks you for help in translation of inscriptions. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You nominated File:Surprisingly erotic murals found in Tajikistan.jpg. Could you please explain why you didn't offer a heads-up to individual who uploaded the image?

Our decisions are supposed to be made through our policies and through civil collegial informed discussion. In my opinion informed collegial discussion precludes making nominations for deletion, and not bothering to inform the individuals who might offer a differign opinion.

For your nomination you wrote: "Reproduction of 2D product of the modern artist; false authorship." Frankly I don't know what this means. I can't know what this means, without seeing the information in the article description template.

Is it possible that you would consider offering that courtesy heads-up if you ever make any nominations in future? Geo Swan (talk) 05:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't offer a courtesy heads-up for your nomination of File:Tajiki_mural.jpg either.

User:ABF reopened the discussion for File:Surprisingly erotic murals found in Tajikistan.jpg, after I left this query.

I reviewed Commons:Image casebook#Murals and Commons:Freedom of Panorama#Former Soviet Union. I now agree the flickr uploader wasn't authorized to republish their photo of the mural, under Tajikistan's copyright laws. They weren't authorized to place a CC liscense on it, and I wasn't authorized to upload it here.

I still think it was a serious mistake on your part to fail to offer the uploader a courtesy heads-up of the nomination. We are all volunteers here. We can't be expected to know all the rules. I suggest it is a disservice to good faith uploaders to fail to tell them of deletion discussions because those deletion discussions provide important feedback to the good faith uploaders, when they are making good faith mistakes. Geo Swan (talk) 19:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the first, I ask you to excuse me if you were offended with this removal. I did not want you as - or to touch with this action.

The tourist in Tadjikistan photographes a fresco in private cafe. The fresco is written at the end of XX or in the beginning of XXI century. Freedom of a panorama here at anything and I am not confident as with it in Tadjikistan. If the photo contained, for example, an interior of cafe it would be possible to argue on freedom of a panorama. But in a photo is only the fresco. Photographing or scanning of pictures, frescos and photos does not give copyrights to the scanning person. The author is alive , or died recently. Аnd only he (or successors) posesses all rights for this work. By rules it even will go on fast removal. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhombomys opimus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Something obstructs the feet a little, bu otherwise good and useful. -- IdLoveOne 06:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it, and I think it's high-quality as well. By the way, it's nice to see all your photos of nature around Baikonur; (assuming you are still there) would it be possible for you to photograph any of the House or Indian House Sparrows there might be there? The English Wikipedia could rather use some photos of sparrows in Kazakhstan. —innotata 19:37, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for a nomination of my photo. I am while in Baikonur, unfortunately the Internet at me very bad. I hope sometime I will lay out on Commons my photo-archive. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passer domesticus on Baikonur does not live. Heap of Passer montanus, should be Passer hispaniolensis. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading this one! The bird on the left is a Passer montanus, the bird with the black throat and grey crown is a Passer domesticus, presumably a Passer domesticus bactrianus as I was hoping for, and the other three are Passer domesticus or Passe hispaniolensis. In any case, a useful photo, actually the first I have seen of different sparrow species together. I hope you can post the rest of your photos some time as well. —innotata 22:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Yuri, did you forget to vote for this picture? It would be very nice if you could vote for the picture. Thank You! --Ras67 (talk) 12:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Мечеть Санкт-Петербурга. Майолика портала.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Мечеть Санкт-Петербурга. Майолика портала.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день. Может быть, вы придумаете мне совет? Что вообще может быть remarkable в Переславле, городе с населением меньше 50 000 человек? Всё более-менее замечательное отсюда увозили в Москву, начиная со времён Ивана Грозного. Богатых строителей с большими хоромами у нас никогда не было. На что мне вообще стоит обращать внимание?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:42, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Хотите юродствовать - юродствуйте. Пожалуйства, не на моей странице обсуждения. У меня нет никакого желания с Вами общаться. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я не юродствую. Я прошу подсказку, хотя настаивать и не могу. Дело в том, что я сам никогда не выставлял и впредь не выставлю своих фотографий на FP, потому что по сравнению со съёмками космических стартов или с изображениями столичных редкостей они не стоят внимания. На Commons принято соглашение, что "фотографом" считается человек, сделавший некоторое число FP. Получается вывод: человек, который занимается фотосъёмками в районном городе, никогда не станет фотографом. Этот вывод мне не нравится, поэтому я и решил обратиться к вам: может быть, вы подскажете мне воодушевляющий вектор. Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Если вас не очень это затруднит, не могли бы вы, если, конечно, будет время, съездить в Темрюк и пофотографировать там обширную коллекцию музея "Военная горка"? Мне из Санкт-Петербурга самым ценным экспонатом кажется танк Т-54-2. Было бы здорово, если бы такую редкую модификацию мы могли бы иллюстрировать без помощи "украинской лазейки". Заранее спасибо. Ain92 (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• К сожалению, в ближайшее время в Темрюк вряд ли попаду. Но, буду иметь в виду. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• В Краснодаре есть музей военной техники «Оружие Победы» на Затоне, постараюсь сфотографировать, что там есть. И, кстати, фотографии военной техники ВОВ можно без проблем грузить под свободной лицензией? Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Погуглив, выяснил, что жемчужинами экспозиции являются ПЛ М-261 и 76-мм зенитная пушка обр. 1938, правда, почему-то с дульным тормозом. Судя по всему, то, что там называется 23-мм АЗО, вероятно, является 25-мм 72-К без бронещита и задних колёс, зато с некоторыми дополнениями (может, послевоенная модернизация? прицел уж больно специфический, сравните [1] и File:72-K-8.jpg, напоминает прицел с 37-мм 70-К; очень хотелось бы рассмотреть его поближе, да и хороших фоток 70-К всего 2, обе с одного и того же ракурса). Может быть, и с 76-мм зениткой какая-то ошибка. В общем, будет время, постарайтесь сделать побольше фотографий со всевозможных ракурсов, а потом разберёмся. И, кстати, как вам могло в голову прийти, что с лицензированием собственных фото военной техники (не важно, какого времени) могут быть проблемы? Ain92 (talk) 10:48, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Забежал после работы, обзорно пофоткал (Category:Weapons of Victory exhibition, Krasnodar), загрузил без обработки и описаний. Надеюсь, что нибудь пригодится. Подлодку очень жалко, печальное зрелище. Если какая из этих железяк особо заинтересует, пишите, постараюсь более детально её запечатлеть. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Большое спасибо, уже пригодилось. Я написал в проект Артиллерия, могут появиться запросы оттуда, поэтому подожду немножко, чтобы вас лишний раз не гонять. Кстати, вход на выставку свободный? Ain92 (talk) 10:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Да, вход свободный. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • К слову, я вашу страницу к себе в список наблюдения добавил, так что мне необязательно было оставлять talkback. ;-) Об этом информирует специально поставленный в шапку СО шаблон {{Usertalkback}} (рекомендую). Ain92 (talk) 10:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • В общем, коли запросов от "артиллеристов" не поступило, то их сформулирую я: в первую очередь хотелось бы получить максимально подробные фотки СУ-122-54, во вторую — более-менее подробные станции РЭБ Р-330, в третью — отдельную (чтобы другие орудия не мешали восприятию) фотографию 37-мм корабельной артустановки (70-К), а в четвёртую — маскимально подробные фотки прицела на 25-мм зенитке (72-К). К слову, "76-мм зенитная пушка обр. 1938" оказалась широко распространённой 85-мм пушкой (52-К) военного времени выпуска. Заранее спасибо. Ain92 (talk) 18:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Tomer T (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mixtec - Polychrome Standing Figure with Raised Hand - Walters 482812 - Three Quarter.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mixtec - Polychrome Standing Figure with Raised Hand - Walters 482812 - Three Quarter.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chimú - Erotic Couple - Walters 20091314 - Three Quarter.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chimú - Erotic Couple - Walters 20091314 - Three Quarter.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Роза Лыгденова.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Роза Лыгденова.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Юрий, спасибо за номинирование моих работ на FP. Приятная неожиданность) Прочитал обсуждение к работам. Теперь стараюсь подробно описывать их. Как и рекомендует шаблон, хотел сам номинировать несколько своих фотографий. Что-то у меня не получилось. Ссылка на мой файл высветилась красным шрифтом - фотография не отобразилась на страничке. Сделад по аналогии с другими работами. Ссылку поставил вверху списка кандидатов. Вроде по инструкции действовал. Помогите, пож-та, правильно выставить работу на обсуждение. Как часто и сколько за один раз можно выставлять своих работ? Аркадий Зарубин (talk) 12:50, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Аркадий, это вам спасибо за отличные фотографии прекрасного края. При номинировании вы добавили {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Young Cossack Ivan Kudryavtsev.jpg}}, но не создали саму подстраницу для номинации (см. Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#Adding a new nomination). Шаг 1: создание страницы (добавляете имя файла, например Young Cossack Ivan Kudryavtsev.jpg в строку ввода после Commons:Featured picture candidates/File: и нажимаете на кнопку "Create new nomination") Шаг 2: заполняете поля шаблона подстраницы в открывшемся окне (вместо SHORT DESCRIPTION добавляете краткое описание файла на английском; строку USERNAME меняете на Аркадий Зарубин; если фото имеет вертикальную обрезку то меняете landscape на portrait) и сохраняете страницу (кнопка "Записать страницу"). Шаг 3: добавление номинации (вы сдалали его при попытке номинирования, но сейчас эта строка уже удалена, т.к. страница не была создана). Одновременно участник может выставлять 2 работы. Следующие работы можно высталять после того, как эти первые две будут выбраны/не выбраны - это произойдёт максимум через 10 дней, но итог может быть подведён раньше если единогласно проголосовало много участников. Прочитайте также Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#Guidelines for nominators. Удачи, всегда рад помочь. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Юрий, спасибо. Благодаря Вашей помощи номинировал две работы. Голосовать может каждый желающий? Есть какие-то ограничения? Аркадий Зарубин (talk) 21:24, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Требования к голосующим минимальные - 10 дней регистрации и 50 правок (Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#Voting) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 05:00, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, Юрий) Уже голосую) Еще один вопрос: я досрочно снял одну из номинированных работ, поняв, что она неподходящего уровня для FP (коллеги подсказали). Могу ли взамен сейчас номинировать другую свою работу? Или нужно выждать какое-то время? Аркадий Зарубин (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я думаю, что можно номинировать. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 04:46, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, Юрий. Что-нибудь подберу сейчас для номинирования)) Аркадий Зарубин (talk) 11:31, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Шаманская трость.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Шаманская трость.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Yuriy75, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 17:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lob Жаворонки 95.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lob Жаворонки 95.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) If you find something else misscategorized please tell me :D Béria Lima ^msg 14:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yuriy75,

Thank you for taking the time to review this FPC. Since your vote on the original, an alternative has been proposed. Another reviewer has requested that early voters also consider the alternative. Thanks, --Slaunger (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Привет! Насчет разблокировки - этого не будет в ближайшие года два. Не во мне/ нас причина. Скажем, и "художник" Ленинградист, и я, "башкир" (в кавычках - специализация) продолжаем писать статьи по своей тематике. Но "художник" в своем блоге, а я - анонимно, но в Вики. --83.149.21.92 14:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)--83.149.21.92 14:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Astana International Airport 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Astana International Airport 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cristales cueva de Naica.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cristales cueva de Naica.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый Юрий Данилевский, я установил корневую категорию Category:Khatchkars для File:Khatchkar Met L.2009.8.jpg, чтобы его изображение било видно в общем альбоме корневой категории Category:Khatchkars. Это не вносит путаницу в древе категорий и в работе системи при обработке указанных категорий и подкатегорий. Без указания корневой категории, естественно, изображение выводится только в альбоме соответсвующей подкатегории.

Пожалуйста, если Вы не против, установите Category:Khatchkars для File:Khatchkar Met L.2009.8.jpg.

С уважением, Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый Vahram Mekhitarian, для целей просмотра альбомов больше подходят специально созданные альбомные старницы - Khachkar (можно при желании создавать пободные страницы на разных языках и т.д.), а не категории. File:Khatchkar Met L.2009.8.jpg, безусловно, является одним из самых качественных изображений хачкаров на викискладе, и достоин быть на главной станице-альбоме, посвящённой хачкарам. Категории, напротив, должны быть максимально конкретны - вплоть до заведения категори на каждый известный хачкар. Иначе пользователь не сможет найти конкретное нужное ему изображение - ведь названия файлов даются произвольно, а других способов сортировки в категориях не предусмотрено. Ваши правки (добавление корневой категории во все файлы включённые в подкатегори) не соответсвуют практике викисклада. С уважением, Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый Юрий Данилевский, Вы конечно правы и я учту Ваши замечания в дальнейшей работе. Мои действия следует приписать неопытности нового участника (я активен в Википедии с мая месяца). А File:Khatchkar Met L.2009.8.jpg, действительно, является одним из самых качественных изображений хачкаров на викискладе, и достоин быть на главной странице-альбоме. С уважением, Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Троїцький монастир.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Троїцький монастир.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Мечеть Кул Шариф 02, 2009.jpg

And also:

• File:Мечеть Кул Шариф, 2009.jpg

Спасибо за Ваши фотографии. К сожалению, фотографии мечети Кул-Шариф придётся удалить. Дело в том, что в России здания и памятники защищены авторскими правами до сметри автора (архитектора или скульптора) и ещё 70 лет. Так как мечеть Кул-Шариф была построена в 2000-е годы и архитекторы живы, она ещё долго будет охраняться, и её фотографии на Викисклад загружать нельзя. Если российское законодательство изменится, фотографии будут восстановлены.Ymblanter (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC) Ymblanter (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Да я в курсе. Ничего не поделаешь. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Господин Zavarych, вы что-то путаете. В правилах викисклада нет запрета грузить свои фотографии непосредственно на викисклад без otrs-тикета и предворительной загрузки в другие (конкурирующие) фотобанки. Надеюсь, ваши действия по выставлению шаблона "без лицензии" на фотографии со свободной лицензией, загруженные добросовестными участниками были произведены по неопытности. Внимательно изучайте правила, удачи, Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:34, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте Господин Ю. Данилевский. Тогда объясните мне пожалуйста, для чего здесь написано,что нужно указывать OTRS - Википедия:Получение разрешений, цитирую - В связи с тем, что часто авторы дают очень нечёткие разрешения на использование своих произведений (например, «разрешаю использовать в Википедии» или «в образовательных целях»), рекомендуется использовать следующий шаблонный текст разрешения. Лично когда я добавлял фотографии без OTRS, их постоянно удаляли, а как стал получать OTRS, сразу все успокоились, что здесь меняется? Откуда вы знаете, что они добросовестные участники, может большая часть из них добавляет не свои фотографии. Так, что нечего здесь кого-то выгораживать, все одинаковы. Вы тоже загляните в правила. С уважением. --Zavarych (talk) 11:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HiYuri, no problem making category - Tash Rabat instead of Rabat of Tash.--Ashashyou (talk) 00:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Я убрал его из images for deletion, куда вы его положили: это несчастье и есть то, что осталось от Демьянова. Kaluga.2012 (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ок. Просто мне показалось что там больше сугроб с кустом, а не остнки флигеля. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Glareola maldivarum - Beung Borapet.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glareola maldivarum - Beung Borapet.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

שלום יורי,

קיבלתי הודעה בקשר לתמונה של שמואל דותן ואני מניחה שההודעה הזו קשורה בהיסוס שלכם לגבי זכויות היוצרים שלה. ובכן, אין שום בעיה עם פרסום התמונה הזאת. אלמנתו של שמואל דותן מסרה לי אותה לפרסום במסגרת הערך עליו, שאותו כתבתי. זוהי תמונה משפחתית והמשפחה מעוניינת בפרסומה.

תודה, Anutksui

Благодарю, Юрий!

Ваша помощь очень своевременна! Желая добавить как можно больше категорий, для лучшего поиска файла, находила в ВИКИ похожие темы и добавляла категории, указаные там, к своим работам. Оказалось, что время потрачено зря! Пока не могу до конца разораться и, если ввожу название на английском языке, система извещает о противоречии ввода. Большое спасибо за оценку моей работы!

С уважением, Жанетта Багаджиян

Здравствуйте, Юрий! Если Вас не затруднит, прошу дать ссылку на страницу, на которой можно заполнить форму для работ, представленных в номинации "Качественные". С инструкцией заполнения и требований к изображениям я ознакомилась, но при переходе по ссылке Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list, не появляется таблица с шаблонами для вставки. Причем, открыть таблицу для номинации в избранные фото для меня не составило труда. Зараннее благодарю! C уважением,Жанетта Багаджиян.

К сожалению, на русский многое на этом сайте не переведено: Commons:Image guidelines - общие требования к фотографиям, Commons:Quality images candidates - про проект "качественные изображения" . Чтобы быстро номинировать фотографию на качественные можно воспользоваться гаджетом (это маленькая программка, которая загружается в ваш браузер) QInominator. Чтобы включить QInominator откройте вкладку настройки (ссылка на неё у вас находится сверху), выберите там вкладку "Гаджеты", поставьте галочку перед нужным и нажмите кнопку "сохранить" снизу. После этого на страницах картинок у вас справа должна появиться ссылка "Nominate this image for QI". И ещё - основы викиразметки, это не трудно. Удачи, Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

         Здравствуйте, Юрий!

  Благодарю, что нашли время ответить на мои вопросы. Я сделала, все, как Вы советовали. Над моими изображениями появилась надпись Image selected for QI nomination.Текст к фото я отредактировала. Это все? Могу ли я увидеть свои работы среди остальных? 

Инструкции на английском я, конечно же, перевожу с помощью переводчика, но даже прочитав текст на родом языке и следуя указаниям, не всегда достигаю желаемого результата. Поэтому Ваша доброжелательность и готовность помочь - очень радуют! Спасибо!

                          С уважением, Жанетта Багаджиян.

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Yuriy75⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. You've added permission lacking tags to three of images uploaded by me

• File:Los Angeles protest against Azerbaijan.jpg
• en:File:Raffi Hovannisian 2012.jpg
• en:File:Hrant Bagratyan.jpg

All of them are in PD because they are screenshots from YouTube videos uploaded with "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". Please check again. --Yerevanci (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Да, извините. Creative Commons на ролике не заметил, буду внимательней. Ещё раз извините за беспо��ойство. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yerevanci, please be more careful. The images you list are not Public Domain, they are copyrighted and licensed as CC-BY. If you do not understand the difference, you must learn it before you do anything more on Commons. Start by reading Licensing. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:36, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as being tagged {categorise} fixed and fixed, please see here, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Yuriy75,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:860808-Saffronfarm-05-IMG 7845-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:860808-Saffronfarm-05-IMG 7845-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. Thanks for pointing that. I probably looked at his similar edits in another file. Block already removed. Ankry (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making DR nominations such as this:

"Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contributions."

It is essential that you tell us whether an image is in use or not. If you do not give that information in the nom, the closing Admin has to open the file and check, which takes much longer..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand. If the user has created a personal page only and nothing else, then it uses the resources of the fund properly. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 03:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean "improperly" above.

If the image is in use on one of the WPs, even, as you say, on a user page of someone who has done nothing else, then we cannot delete it. It is up to the editors on the WP where it is used to delete the image first. The policy on the subject,

"by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed." (Commons:Project_scope#File_in_use_in_another_Wikimedia_project)

says nothing about the user's other contributions. And, of course, it could be a new user who intends to work on WMF soon, but has not yet started. By deleting his image you will send him away.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ок. I can not requests to delete selfi of users with the experience of less than one year, which created anything but userpages. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite -- you can certainly request deletion, but in all cases you must say whether or not the file is in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yuriy75,

Can you explain why you removed file and categories form Category:Caucasus Germans?

for example:

• File:Xilaskar Kilsəsi.JPG - in use in en.wiki Caucasus Germans
• File:Kirche in Helenendorf.png
• Category:Lutheran Church in Baku

Can you explain? --Geagea (talk) 01:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geagea. I placed full Category:Lutheran churches in Azerbaijan in Category:Caucasus Germans. Because all of these buildings is a heritage of caucasus germans. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 04:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. Thanks. Geagea (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте, Юрий! Вы несправедливо заподозрили меня в нарушении авторских прав. Файл jpg. "Обложка книги Ю. А. Бутенко" размещён мною и не может нарушать авторских прав, поскольку я и есть автор (Ю.А.Бутенко, а Ю.А.Коловрат - псевдоним).--Юрата Коловрат (talk) 20:51, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Что за файл? Название ничего мне не говорит. При чем тут я? Я его загружал? Если да (но я этого не помню), то почему он стремительно удален? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Там была фотография схемы со значком копирайта (из украинского музея, размещения Запорожской сечи в разные годы), вы просто загрузили его улучшенную версию. Бот при удалении разослал предупреждения авторам всех всем загрузок. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• А, сколько-то лет назад было такое. Теперь понятно. Я ведь даже название не мог понять - Sici. Мне в голову всё Sicista (т.е. мышовка) лезла, но я не мог поверить, что стал бы грузить картинку со столь корявым названием. В общем удалили и фиг с ним. Просто увидел картинку с плохим балансом белого и поправил. Мне она не принципиальна. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте, Юрий! Я удалил многие файлы, но там проблем с авторским правом не должно было быть. Другие файлы(Нессебр, Лебедь в Нессебре) вообще мои личные, я их оставил пока что на викискладе. Не ясно, как там вы плагиат видите. Плюс зачем надо было в разделе Болгария удалить сегодня утром все добавленные фото? ЗАЧЕМ? Знаю, что много добавил, и не все равномерно, но с попыткой такой инфо., вы хуже себе делаете. Думаю вам есть чем заниматься, вижу вы про Татарстан фото добавляете, а их первых предках, которые в ЕС сейчас, красивые фото зависть, или проблемы, немного злость, неясно, зачем надо было все фото удалять из страницы. Вы как понимаю никак не болгарин, и не татарин, так что не надо нашу историю скрывать. Спасибо.

Вы добавили много чужих фотографий, просто взятых из интернета. При добавлении чужой фотографии нужно письмо от автора с разрешением (OTRS) на публикацию под свободной лицензией. Отметьте на странице удаления фотографии сделанные лично вами. Если подводящий итоги администратор поверит что это ваши фотографии, то они будут оставлены. Удачи в изучении правил. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Фото с разных времен, тюркского периода, византийского, и другие. Правила изучу подробнее, спасибо. Я поздно ночью помещал их, с лицензией ошибся. Если можете просьба, и у Вас фото эти еще остались, некоторые из них разместите в разделе, Болгария. Фото все относятся к стране. Спасибо.

Hi Yuriy75. You may find this tool useful. --Leyo 00:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Привет! Это Giant Sunset или что-то другое? у меня эти Giant'ы в первый год странно себя ведут. Уже фостеры отцвели и дарвины отцветают, из грейгов только Pinocchio остался - а эти копухи только-только из-под земли вылезают. И очень медленно: луковицы огромные были, а ботвы совсем немного. Правда, бутоны внушительные - но у самой земли. Место солнечное, все другие сорта в этом цветнике вышли в полный рост. - ?? Retired electrician (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Покупал в розницу из коробки как Orange Sunset этой осенью. Зацвёл раньше всех грейгов. Думаю их не выкапывать этом году, пусть с луками и малявками посидят. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Зацвёл на этой неделе - когда уже отцвели и грейги, и дарвины. Точно как на ваших фото. Пошли дожди, потому сложно сказать, каким был бы / будет полностью распущенным. Но ни о каких рекламных восьми дюймах и речи нет. Жулики, бутона не доложили ;) Retired electrician (talk) 17:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Всё, у меня тюльпанный сезон окончен, последние завязи с утра оборвал :( Точно, кругом жулики - у отечественных фасовщиков голландских отходов - сплошная пересортица, а из трёх купленных парротов ни один так и не зацвёл :) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Я своих попугаев жду - им пока рано. Раньше вырастали без проблем, но всегда какие-то мелкие и ... скушные. Держу их только потому, что цветут позже всех. Retired electrician (talk) 18:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ras67 (talk) 01:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abai monument in Baykonur city 0.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ras67 (talk) 13:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Leopard cat range.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 11:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leopard cat range.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add Montenegro and South Sudan (because they were forgotten) in File:Caprimulgus europaeus distr.png and File:Caprimulgus europaeus -range map.png?

I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and Category:Maps needing Montenegro political boundaries, and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files from 1 March 2018, now it is reduced to less than 780 maps, but there is a long way to go.

Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps and complicated PNG maps myself, that is why I asked you.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yuriy75,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Nilssonia nigricans has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 18:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3ANilssonia_nigricans&type=revision&diff=340124362&oldid=93767279 Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I updated the image. Could you check? dcbmariano (talk)

Yes, this one is more like it. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dzhuchi-khan Mausoleum has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Qualitätssicherung (talk) 11:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]