User talk:Sanchezn

Bravo pour la photo : j'ai modifié l'illustration de La Sculpture française du XIXe siècle en la découvrant. Merci. PRA 07:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:MuseeDOrsay.jpg, which was nominated by Benh at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:MuseeDOrsay.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 23:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated your image in Quality image candidates. It is a remarkable work, congratulations. J'espère bien que vous soyez un peu moins honteux pour pouvoir participer avec plein droit à COM:FPC et COM:QIC. Salut, Alvesgaspar 22:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PanoMontBlancHDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:MontBlanc2c.jpg, which was nominated by Benh at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:MontBlanc2c.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 22:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your photo Image:AiguilleDuMidiTM.jpg's category Creatde with Hugin is red. Can you fix it? Thanks --Beyond silence 08:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:PanoMontBlancHDR edit 1.jpg, which was nominated by Alvesgaspar at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:PanoMontBlancHDR edit 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 22:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Palais Luxembourg Sunset Edit.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Palais Luxembourg Sunset Edit.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 23:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:AiguilleDuMidiTM.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:AiguilleDuMidiTM.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Ben^chat 09:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey would you mind if I cloned out the cable in Rogers Center-restitched.jpg? I'm never sure what proper etiquette is. Great work on that BTW. JaGa 05:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CathedraleBeziers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Rogers Center-restitched.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rogers Center-restitched.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 10:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CygneVaires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NotreDameDeParis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Hi, I just wanted you to know I've followed some advice I got and uploaded a new version of the image that is much better. I dont want to botter you with that, but maybe it will make you reconsider your choise. Good day. ;) Acarpentier 17:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CopalmeDAmerique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LionDeBelfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:CygneVaires.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:CygneVaires.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh 22:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:ColapteryxVirgo.jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ColapteryxVirgo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 23:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BrehatE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great --Simonizer 16:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ChateauDeRentilly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done --Massimo Catarinella 16:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CathedraleEtVieuxPontBeziers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details & composition --Ianare 04:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Nicolas.

Dans ce cas, je crois, la seule chose qu'on peut faire est de demander un checkuser. You should list the suspected users and ask Herby (or Lar or SB Johnny). He'll know what to do. Lycaon (talk) 22:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• "Il n'y a pas de péché sinon la stupidité." Oscar Wilde "contre la stupidité, même les dieux - se disputent en vain." de Friedrich von Schiller--Sensl (talk) 20:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Superb image. Would you like to sign? Durova (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:ChateauDeRentilly.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ChateauDeRentilly.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:DefecatingSeagull.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DefecatingSeagull.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Lycaon (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J'avais vu que ce n'était pas toi qui avais fait la deuxième nomination, la remarque ne visait pas à t'accuser de quoi que ce soit, c'était juste pour informer de l'état de fait ! --Eusebius (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We are starting the discussion on POTY 2008. Would you like to join? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sanchezn

I have seen your picture

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:CopalmeDAmerique.jpg

It is such a beautiful autumn tree! Therefore I would like to ask you permission to print this picture in our Paracelsus magazine. Paracelsus magazine is a product of global cooperation, with people from Europe, North and South America, and India volunteering their time and working without pay. The objective of the magazine is to blend ancient and modern wisdom of medicine and holistic healing. The magazine is published monthly in three different languages: German, Spanish, and English; it is read all on every continent of the world. It reaches physicians, alternative practitioners and ordinary people. C Although we sell the magazine, we are a non profit organisation and the printing coasts are hardly covered. Would you be so generous and give us your permission to print this photograph? We thank you in advance for your consideration and reply and send you our very best wishes. Anna Beutler anna.beutler@gmx.ch PS: For more information please visit our homepage: www.paracelsus-center.ch

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FortDuGuesclin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Richard Bartz 13:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
		J'ai l'honneur de vous décerner la Photographers Blackbelt (ceinture noire des photographes) pour vos photos remarquables et excellentes. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChateauDeRentilly.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

Sreejith K (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The website you're talking about (http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/samoylovsw/view/331580/?page=0) is obviously the copyright violator. Not the contrary. sanchezn (talk) 13:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with you, but since the website was not in English, I wanted to cross check with some other user. No offence meant. --Sreejith K (talk) 13:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We wanted to let you know that we've used one of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/14425284315/lit-the-mirror-of-literature-amusement-and

We created a computer program to generate random pairings of sentences from public domain texts and public domain / creative commons images. Some of the pictures we've selected come from the Wikipedia Commons. All the pictures we select ourselves, but the pairings and the text are random. Of these pairings that are generated, we only post the most interesting combinations.

We welcome any feedback about our site.

Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick

blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: litpicsbloggmail.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics

Litpics (talk) 23:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colouring_pencils_crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Japs 88 (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CygneVaires.jpg

And I attributed the picture like this: Sanchezn with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sanchezn and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 11:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein-c1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Swallow flying drinking.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swallow flying drinking.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas, fairly urgent emailed Signpost inquiry sent yesterday. If you responded (by email, please), we could quote you. Tony1 Tony (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swallow flying drinking.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But why do you nominate FPs to QI? --Podzemnik 21:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 09:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply] I do not have any specific reason -- Eatcha 19:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North side of Orsay Museum building, 4 August 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe a bit too much sharpening, but IMHO really good for a 2007 photo. --Aristeas 18:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello,

i used one of your fotos in one of my art-projects. you find it here:

deadline bis übermorgen - LmaA

Feel free to listen to my playlist. :)

Thank you for your very good foto.

Best regards Hilmar — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:8108:9640:1ED4:C9DD:3FC2:44A1:8DF3 (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]