User talk:Rbrechko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk page archives:

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0014 Pryozerne Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0037 Pidhirtsi Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0012 Bratkivtsi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0170 Pidhaitsi Mitskevich Monument RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted (seems that you used the crooked signpost on the right as a reference instead of the buildings in background) --Plozessor 05:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko 10:24, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better now, thx! --Plozessor 18:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Paraskeva church, Berezhnytsia, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0005 Buchach Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 12:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0013 Verchany Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0007 Horozhanka Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0002 Budkiv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted --Poco a poco 08:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks. Fixed and deployed new version. --Rbrechko 10:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0004 Buchach Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0040 Rozhirche Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0052 Vyshnivets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bortnyky Vikovi Lypy RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:34, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2025!

-- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezhyrichchia Wooden Church RB 46-215-0038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 10:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0010 Buchach Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for 2025!

[edit]
  * Happy Holidays, Rbrechko! *  
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
  • Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2025!

Pierre André (talk) 11:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays and best wishes for 2025!

[edit]
Happy holidays
Rbrechko!
Merry christmas!
Best wishes for 2025!

-- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yazlovets Castle, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church, Yosypovychi, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0038 Trybukhivtsi Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0034 Pykulovychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0002 Buchach Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dibrova Reserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0009 Berezhnytsia Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 14:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zhydachiv Castle Settlement RB 46-215-0126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0001 Verchany Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0044 Pidhaitsi Mitskevycha 9 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church, Hlukhovychi, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilian monastery in Buchach, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nemyriv Park V RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0007 Buchach Church of the Intercession RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Crops left and right should be improved --Poco a poco 02:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you. I deployed new version. --Rbrechko 13:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Костел Успіння, Язловець, вхід SW, 2012 (Rbrechko, 61-212-0018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

З Новим роком!

[edit]
One of the Three Wise Men/Kings/Magi with his camel, detail of the nativity scene in the Saint Peter and Paul church, Weil der Stadt ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Щасливого Різдва!
З Новим роком!

Hello Roman Brechko,
thank you very much for your great contributions to Wikimedia Commons! All the best,
Roman Eisele / Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bilokrynytsia Palace, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-0014 Lelekhivka Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dub Vyhovskoho RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NNP Yavorivskyi Table RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would be helpful to add the nomination words in English at least into the image caption, if not perhaps also into the description. --Scotch Mist 07:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Citypark RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nimchych RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0008 Buchach St Mykolai Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0006 Buchach Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Well number 6, view from E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel for Khotyn victory, view from E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velykyi Lubin Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dibrova Reserve Table RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NNP Hutsulshchyna RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pechera Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lvivskyi Reserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0010 Berezhnytsia Outhouse RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0014 Pidzamochok Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lviv Stryiskyi Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bania Lysovetska Wellspring N6 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-5006 Bania Lysovetska RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-248-5023 Popadia RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0016 Yazlovets Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0015 Pryozerne Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A lot of CA around the leaves. --Plozessor 04:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks. Deployed new version. --Rbrechko 20:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but actually can't see a difference, the CA is there as before. --Plozessor 05:25, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Hmm. Could you tell me what kind of CA (at least color) you see and place where it is? Because I can't find anything critical. --Rbrechko 16:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, the purple stuff here, similar in the upper right corner. --Plozessor 07:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Hopefully I fixed it this time. New version has been uploaded. --Rbrechko 15:19, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Acceptable now, thx! --Plozessor 19:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0049 Buchach Statue of Virgin Mary RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0023 Buchach Shevchenka 9 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RLP Dnistrovskyi Canyon RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medova Pechera RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Exaltation of the Holy Cross church, Yosypovychi, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0050 Vyshnivets Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0005 Vyshnivets Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0006 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0008 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0093 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0018 Zbarazh Church of the Resurrection RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0044 Zbarazh School RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:54, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0022 Zbarazh Nezalezhnosti 25 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Presentation of Mary, Stankivtsi, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Ascension, Mezhyrichchia, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0020 Cherche Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0004 Pidhirtsi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0006 Strilkiv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 02:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Source №1 «Boniface», view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the church of the Beheading of Saint John the Baptist, Stare Selo, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Lelekhivka, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brody synagogue RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Btspurplegalaxy 03:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bibrka Shevchenka 7 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skala-Podilska Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piatnychany Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zhvanets Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit grainy sky but still ok. --Plozessor 04:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0054 Vyshnivets Monastery Gates RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:58, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:61-212-9001 Buchach Monastery RB 24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:61-212-9001 Buchach Monastery RB 24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khotyn Fortress RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarnoruda Catholic Church 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Palace 4 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Palace 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Palace 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Palace 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Transfiguration, Bratkivtsi, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0095 Ustechko Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0099 Ustechko Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0070 Sadky Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0032 Rozdil Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0019 Anhelivka Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0062 Nyrkiv Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-106-5001 Drohobych Khmelnytskoho Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist, Ivanivtsi, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary, Anhelivka, Chortkiv Raion (OCU), view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0005 Nahoriany Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0103 Shutromyntsi Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0096 Ustechko Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0053 Vyshnivets Trinity Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please try to reduce the noise in the sky a bit --Michielverbeek 07:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I reduced noise in the sky and uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 12:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me now --Michielverbeek 06:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-5021 Porohova Rock RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0047 Dorohychivka Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0029 Rozdil Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0053 Busk St Mykolai Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0386 Shutromyntsi WW2 Monument RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-9001 Zbarazh Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-253-0009 Steblivka Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Would probably have cropped slightly distracting branch and telegraph pole on left but good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Nezalezhnosti Street, Zbarazh, view from S..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0027 Obroshyno Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0050 Shchyrets Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0049 Shchyrets Catholic Church Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0041 Semyhyniv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0017 Zaklad Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0016 Olesko Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0097 Ustechko Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Otherwise good but  Underexposed. --Plozessor 04:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I uploaded new version. Is it better now? --Rbrechko 14:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, thx! Good now! --Plozessor 05:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0003 Zbarazh Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:30, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Source № 4 (Materi Bozhoyi), view from N..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0005 Vidnyky Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-0009 Vyshnia Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Kanusyak, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Khotyn Fortress RB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Khotyn Fortress RB.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0023 Pidhaitsi Berezhanska 8 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0073 Pidhaitsi Shevchenka 28 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0071 Pidhaitsi Shevchenka 24 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0052 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 6 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0051 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 5 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0011 Hryniv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0006 Vidnyky Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catholic church in Ustechko, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0023 Lisnevychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0020 Kotsuriv Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0019 Kotsuriv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]