User talk:POS78
|
No
[edit]Please stop with moving names. --Orijentolog (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog See references (1 and 2)! OK. {{User|POS78}} talk 16:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter. That source is strong and can be used for many places, but not for all. Some names are too much common in English to change, for example gndb.ncc.gov is giving "Neyšābur (Neyshabur)" but there's no way that we'll change common name "Nishapur". Beside, I also asked you ten times to inform me if you want to change something, but you did not. --Orijentolog (talk) 16:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog As you said, the source is strong and I was absolutely sure that I was doing the right thing But I was wrong and I will try not to repeat. I will inform next time, Do not worry brother. I'm a fool. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 16:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Technically it's not a mistake, various names would be correct: Gouged, Gougad, Googed, Googad... but it's better to keep it like it is, trust me. :) I'm generally careful about naming, spending a looooot of time to find proper names, as well as to check are there any namesakes (like two "Quzd Qanats", which you missed!). --Orijentolog (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- As I said before, You rock. ;) {{User|POS78}} talk 17:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Technically it's not a mistake, various names would be correct: Gouged, Gougad, Googed, Googad... but it's better to keep it like it is, trust me. :) I'm generally careful about naming, spending a looooot of time to find proper names, as well as to check are there any namesakes (like two "Quzd Qanats", which you missed!). --Orijentolog (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog As you said, the source is strong and I was absolutely sure that I was doing the right thing But I was wrong and I will try not to repeat. I will inform next time, Do not worry brother. I'm a fool. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 16:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter. That source is strong and can be used for many places, but not for all. Some names are too much common in English to change, for example gndb.ncc.gov is giving "Neyšābur (Neyshabur)" but there's no way that we'll change common name "Nishapur". Beside, I also asked you ten times to inform me if you want to change something, but you did not. --Orijentolog (talk) 16:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Bidesgan Castle
[edit]You opened Bidesgan Castle based on copyrighted photo which was deleted, so castle remained empty. But, instead of deletion, I made a sketch that we keep it. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Thank you very much for your kindness. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 07:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Atashgah castle2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Aetius (talk) 13:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
@Orijentolog: Hi, I have uploaded several photos, Do you have time to create categories for images? Thanks {{User|POS78}} talk 22:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Dear POS78, at the moment I don't, but I'll solve it later. Hoob? :) --Orijentolog (talk) 02:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- like Rivash? I hope it is not so. {{User|POS78}} talk 10:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't forget Rivash also! But step by step, I promised you to solve castles first, and I was working hard on it. Still not complete. --Orijentolog (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay sotunam! Good luck. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 13:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'll speak with someone in next 2-3 days about this file (File talk:Arslan Jazeb Mausoleum2022-07-19.jpg), that someone first merge two pages, then we'll do the rest here. At the moment I'm busy with Mount Damavand and around area, it killed me. Harder than climbing to the top! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 18:07, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Very Good. thanks
- khoda qovat kuhnavard {{User|POS78}} talk 12:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- First, happy New year dear POS78! :)
- Secondly, I'll put Yavari Castle to solve it later. Sorry dadash for being late but Tehran killed me! :( --Orijentolog (talk) 11:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog: Happy New Year to you too my dear.
- No problem, I will wait. :)
- By the way, I have created some categories, is it okay? (Talkhuncheh, Baghjar, Zarqan, Abrud, Keykhosrow, Rud Sarab, Hoseynabad, Riab Hammam and Sang Nesveh River). Thanks for your future review. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 12:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Atashgah Castle! Finally, I uploaded the photos of this castle as promised. {{User|POS78}} talk 00:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Category:Qal'eh Chehel Dokhtar, Kashmar {{User|POS78}} talk 17:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'll speak with someone in next 2-3 days about this file (File talk:Arslan Jazeb Mausoleum2022-07-19.jpg), that someone first merge two pages, then we'll do the rest here. At the moment I'm busy with Mount Damavand and around area, it killed me. Harder than climbing to the top! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 18:07, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay sotunam! Good luck. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 13:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't forget Rivash also! But step by step, I promised you to solve castles first, and I was working hard on it. Still not complete. --Orijentolog (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- like Rivash? I hope it is not so. {{User|POS78}} talk 10:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
It should be Modarres Hospital (Kashmar), because there are other namesake hospitals in Iran. I'm putting it here, so that I can remember it later, along with other promises which I gave you. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 18:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Q106679595 {{User|POS78}} talk 10:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
بارگذاری صحیح
[edit]سلام و روز بخیر. با توجه به اینکه تصاویر بارگذاری شده از سایت هایی همچون، فارس، مهر، تسنیم و ... نیاز به بازبینی تصویر و تایید توسط بازبین های تصویر و یا مدیران دارد، باید این تصاویر در دسته بندی تصاویر نیازمند تایید مربوط به خود قرار گیرند. به طور مثال تصاویری که شما از خبرگزاری مهر بارگذاری میکنید باید در دسته بندی Mehrnews review needed قرار گیرند. اگر در زمان بارگذاری تصاویر فقط از الگوی {{Mehr}}
استفاده کنید، به طور خودکار الگوی مربوط به بازبینی تصویر و همچنین رده تصاویر نیازمند بازبینی مهر به تصویر اضافه نمی شوند و این کار، تصاویر را در خطر حذف در آینده قرار میدهد. از این رو از شما درخواست می شود در زمان بارگذاری حتما بجای {{Mehr}}
از الگوی {{subst:Mehr/subst}}
استفاده کنید که نتیجه اش میشود این. با سپاس و احترام: --MehdiTalk 06:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Mehdi: درود فراوان خدمت استاد ارجمند.
- بله کوتاهی مرا ببخشید و دنیایی تشکر از گوشزدتان. امید است در این روزای غمناک بهترینها برایتان اتفاق بیوفتد و پیشاپیش عیدتان خجسته باد. {{User|POS78}} talk 07:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- @POS78: سپاس بسیار از لطف شما. پیشاپیش نوروز باستانی بر شما گرامی باد و با آرزوی سالی خوش و خرم برای شما و عزیزانتان. --MehdiTalk 08:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Mehdi: درود فراوان آقا حال و احوال؟ جسارتاً میشود این پرونده را بررسی فرمایید؟ دنیایی تشکر {{User|POS78}} talk 17:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @POS78: سلام و سپاس. انجام شد.--MehdiTalk 07:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Mehdi: متشکرم استاد. میشود همچنین این پرونده را بررسی فرمایید؟ کمی شک دارم آپلود چنین پروندههایی درست باشد. سپاسگزارم {{User|POS78}} talk 16:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- @POS78: انجام شد. دیگر شک نداشته باشید. اگر تمایل به بارگذاری ویدئوها دارید، توضیحات را کامل بنویسید و تا می توانید رده های مرتبط را اضافه کنید که زحماتتان بی دلیل نباشد و هدر نرود. با سپاس:--MehdiTalk 16:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- سپاس بیکران. اطاعت امر. {{User|POS78}} talk 17:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Mehdi: درضمن از معرفی این اسکریپت از شما متشکرم. چقدر دلم برای جناب فور تنگ شده…! {{User|POS78}} talk 17:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- جایش برای همیشه در کنج قلبم باقیست. هرجا هستند، در سلامت و زیر سایه الله. --MehdiTalk 18:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- :) {{User|POS78}} talk 18:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- جایش برای همیشه در کنج قلبم باقیست. هرجا هستند، در سلامت و زیر سایه الله. --MehdiTalk 18:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- @POS78: انجام شد. دیگر شک نداشته باشید. اگر تمایل به بارگذاری ویدئوها دارید، توضیحات را کامل بنویسید و تا می توانید رده های مرتبط را اضافه کنید که زحماتتان بی دلیل نباشد و هدر نرود. با سپاس:--MehdiTalk 16:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Mehdi: متشکرم استاد. میشود همچنین این پرونده را بررسی فرمایید؟ کمی شک دارم آپلود چنین پروندههایی درست باشد. سپاسگزارم {{User|POS78}} talk 16:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- @POS78: سلام و سپاس. انجام شد.--MehdiTalk 07:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, dear license reviewer
[edit]Hi POS78, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.
Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!
Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Bedivere (talk) 03:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
واترمارک تسنیم
[edit]سلام و عرض ادب، از زحمتی که بابت تأیید فایلها میکشید تشکر میکنم.
عرضی داشتم در مورد واترمارک تسنیم، به خاطر برچسبخوردن تعداد زیادی از عکسها. تا جایی که من ظرف این مدتی که از این خبرگزاری عکس آپلود کردم متوجه شدم، نمیشه به صرف وضعیت واترمارک به عنوان یک قانون سرانگشتی و تعیینکننده اتکا کرد. عکسهایی که سرویس عکس اونها رو تولید کرده تا حد زیادی قاعدهمند و مشخصه، اما دسته دیگری از عکسها هست که در دفاتر شهرستان تهیه شده و معمولاً توسط خبرنگار مقیم (و نه یک عکاس حرفهای) و چه بسا با گوشی (و نه دوربین عکاسی) گرفته شده. به عنوان مثال من در مورد این عکس تردیدی ندارم که با وجود عدم ذکر نام عکاس در واترمارک و متن خبر، عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم تولید شده که از این رویداد فیلم هم تهیه کرده (میکروفون خبرگزاری هم در عکس مشخصه و در متن خبر تأکید شده که عکسهای اختصاصی توسط خبرنگار خبرگزاری مذکور تهیه شده). یک مثال دیگر از این مورد که در خاطر دارم این عکسه.
در عکسهای دفاتر شهرستان، گاهی موارد خارج از قاعده دیگری هم اتفاق میافته، مثلاً این مورد اصلاً واترمارک نداره، اما اسم عکاس در متن خبر ذکر شده. نمونه دیگری وجود داره که اسم خبرنگار با یک واترمارک عجیب روی عکس حک شده. مثال واترمارک عجیبتر: File:Toophan 3M.jpg. در میان عکسهای اخیراً برچسبخورده هم، مواردی وجود داره که اسم عکاس در متن خبر ذکر شده اما در واترمارک نیست: کامین ملکی - زهرا رستگار. برخی از دفاتر هم اصولاً اسم خبرنگار رو ذکر نمیکنند.
مواجهه با موارد متعدد و متنوعی که برخی از اونها بالاتر ذکر شد، به من اثبات کرده که اگرچه بحثی که در سال ۲۰۱۶ در این خصوص انجام شده بوده با نیت خیر و با توجه صحیح به اهمیت کپیرایت همراه بوده، در بعضی موارد ناکارآمده و منجر به محرومکردن پروژه از عکسهایی خواهد شد که ارزشمند و کاملاً آزاد هستند و آپلودکردن آنها هیچ مشکلی نداره.
با احترام، HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan و @Streamline8988 سلام خدمت دو بزرگوار. طبق این نظرخواهی تمامی تصاویر بدون انتساب صریح واترمارک به عکاسان خبرگزاری، خارج از مجوز تسنیم فرض میشوند بنابراین بنده طبق این نظرخواهی عمل کردهام ولی اگر ممکن است شما دو بزرگوار نیز نظرخواهی دیگری راه بیندازید و نظرات خودتان را بیان سازید و پیروی آن ما عمل کنیم در غیر این صورت نمیشود گفت آنان باید بمانند و من دلیلی برای تأیید مجوز آنان ندارم و باید حذف شوند. در مورد مثالهایی که زدید بنده نظری ندارم ولی اینکه نام عکاس در منبع باشد میتوان دلیلی خوبی دانست برای تأییدشان که باید در نظرخواهی جدیدتان که در مورد تمامی مجوزهای مربوط به خبرگزاریهای ایران باشد حتماً اشاره کنید و فکر میکنم اینجا جای خوبی است برای بیانش. متشکرم از دغدغهمندی جنابان {{User|POS78}} talk 06:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- جایی که سرنوشت صدها فایل به یک تصمیم واحد برمیگردد که قابلمناقشه خواهد بود، منطقی این است که از روال عادی استفاده شود تا اولاً فرصت کافی برای آپلودکننده جهت پاسخگویی فراهم باشد و ثانیاً روال حذف و بحثهای انجامشده برای استفاده آینده مستندسازی شود. از نظر من تصمیم شما در زدن برچسب حذف سریع (به جای نامزدی برای حذف) با هیچکدام از معیارها سازگاری ندارد، چنانچه معیار خاصی مدنظر شما بوده است لطفاً آن را ذکر کنید. همچنین به نظر من کسی که مسئولیت بازبینی لایسنس را بر عهده میگیرد نمیتواند و نباید در چنین مواردی بدون نظر باشد، چون تأیید لایسنس عملاً یک جور کارشناسی کردن است و کار کارشناسی هم با دقت و قضاوت همراه است. کما این که بالاتر هم تلویحاً پذیرفتید که عکسهای کامین ملکی و زهرا رستگار که برچسب حذف سریع زدهبودید و الآن حذف شدهاند، مشکل کپیرایتی نداشتهاند. یا مثلاً در مورد این عکس که شما اخیراً تأیید کردید و برای بنده هم تشکر سیستمی فرستادید، در واترمارک اسم عکاس ذکر نشده اما تصور من این است که شما با توجه به حضور حسین ظهروند (عکاس خبرگزاری تسنیم) در این مراسم و ذکر صریح اسمش در گالری و واترمارک سایر عکسهای مربوطه، اینطور تشخیص دادهاید که این عکس توسط منبع خلق شده و مشکلی ندارد. طبق آن چیزی که من در کامانز تجربه کردم، هدف غایی تمامی بحثها و اجماعسازیها این است که آزاد بودن یا نبودن یک فایل را تشخیص بدهیم، نه این که بخواهیم قوانینی فراتر از قوانین کپیرایت یا کامانز وضع کرده و آنها را وحی منزل تلقی کنیم. این درسی است که سال گذشته من از نامزدکردن تعداد زیادی از عکسهای محمد آگاه برای حذف گرفتم. آخر کار برخلاف انتظارم نه تنها فایلهای نامزدشده باقی ماند، بلکه تمامی فایلهای حذفشده در سالیان گذشته هم طی بحثی که با حضور چند ادمین صورت گرفت آندیلیت شدند. درباره جمله مورد بحث در لایسنس تسنیم هم قبلاً بحثهایی صورت گرفته، منجمله در این نامزدی حذف که منجر به حفظ عکسها شد. بعد از این ماجرا من در صفحه مربوط به لایسنس تسنیم موضوع را مطرح کردم و ادمینی که آن جمله را به تمپلیت اضافه کرده پاسخ جالبی داد: Template talk:Tasnim. نهایتاً این که منظور از آن جمله این بوده که لایسنس برای عکس دارای واترمارک برقرار است ولی برای عکس بدون واترمارک *لزوماً* برقرار نیست. این فرق دارد با این که بگوییم هر عکسی که واترمارک ندارد این لایسنس در مورد آن صادق نیست. از توجه شما ممنونم. با نجدید احترام، HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- جسارتاً تصاویری که بنده درخواست حذف سریعشان کردم طبق نقض حق تکثیر صورت گرفته لطفاً دوباره اینجا را بخوانید! اگه بنده شکی داشته باشم اینگونه عمل میکنم و نامزد برای حذف میکنم. در مورد حذف عکسهای کامین ملکی و زهرا رستگار متوجه نشدم! میشود منبعشان را بدهید؟ متشکرم. در مورد این تصویر هم خودتان گفتید به چه دلیلی تأیید کردم. درکل نام عکاس در واترمارک ملاک میباشد و استثنا آن نام عکاس در منبع خبرگزاری است در غیر این صورت تصویر باید حذف گردد هرچند بنظرم بند دوم باید به الگوی مجوز تسنینم و دیگر الگوها اضافه گردد که به شما گفتم آن را به اجماع برسانید؛ من کمی با معاشرت با زبان انگلیسی ضعیف هستم مگر نه خودم انجامش میدادم حتی زمان درخواست برای دسترسیام به این اشاره کردم انگلیسی را خوب نمیدانم. همچنین از کاربر:هنوز درخواست دارم به ما کمک کند تا موضوع مجوزهای این تصاویر را شفاف سازیم. مجدداً تشکر از دغدغهمندیتان {{User|POS78}} talk 16:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- نقض کپیرایت وقتی میتواند دلیل برچسب حذف سریع باشد که یا فایل قبلاً تخلف تشخیص داده شده باشد (G4) یا این که تخلف آن محرز و واضح باشد (F1) مثلاً عکس از جایی برداشته شده باشه که لایسنس آزاد نداره. به نظرم در مورد نامزدی حذفی که لینک کردید هم شایسته بود که بعد از عرضی که بنده اینجا مطرح کردم، صبر کنید تا بحث به نتیجهای برسه. بگذریم. عکسهایی که لینکشون قرمز شده منبعشون اینجا و اینجا بوده که صریحاً اسم عکاسهای فوق رو ذکر کرده. باید درخواستی برای آندیلیتشدن این فایلها ارائه بشه تا مجدداً در نامزدی برای حذف تصمیمگیری بشه. عدم آشنایی با زبان هیچ اشکال خاصی نداره، من زیاد دیدم که کاربران کامانز مثلاً به زبان آلمانی یا روسی با همدیگه صحبت میکنند (کما این که ما هم اینجا فارسی حرف میزنیم) یا در نظرخواهیها رای میدن، مهم اینه که همه خواستار کمک به کامانز باشیم که هستیم، مطرح کردن موارد در جمع میتونه به زبانهای مختلف صورت بگیره. عرض من اینجا از مطرح کردن صحبت ادمینی که لایسنس تسنیم رو ساخته، ناظر به این هست که در قضاوت در مورد وضعیت کپیرایت یک عکس باید به شواهد و قرائن توجه کرد که خود شما هم این نکته رو قبول کردید، بنابراین ظاهراً اختلاف نظری از این بابت نداریم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan ببینید وقتی تصویری نام عکاس آن مشخص نباشد و تنها تصویر در یک خبرگزاری گذاشته باشد طرف بررسیکننده مطمئن میشود که این یک نقض حق تکثیر است چراکه حتی نام عکاس آن را نگذاشتند و از جایی حتماً نه فقط گوگل بلکه حتی در شبکات اجتماعی تصاویر وجود دارند؛ تنها برای استفاده خبریشان نقض حق تکثیر صورت میدهند و نباید ما آنان را در ویکیانبار بارگذاری کنیم. در مورد تصاویر رژه نیروهای مسلح استان لرستان و مراسم رژه یگانهای نظامی و انتظامی گیلان بنده در تعجبم که درخواست حذفشان را دادهام؛ واقعاً چنین بودهاست؟ لطفاً درخواست آندیلیتشدنشان را بدهید؛ اگر هم پیدا نمیشوند خودتان بارگذاریشان کنید بنده تأییدشان خواهم ساخت. مشکرمندم {{User|POS78}} talk 17:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- از پاسخ شما بعد از این همه توضیح متعجب شدم، و از آن عجیبتر این است که همچنان در حال ادامه دادن به کار خود هستید. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan متوجه منظورتان نشدم. لطفاً شفافتر بفرمایید. متشکرم {{User|POS78}} talk 18:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- برچسبزدن به عکسهای تسنیم را متوقف کنید، این کار همانطور که توضیح دادم نه تنها کمکی به پروژه نمیکند بلکه احتمالاً منجر به تکرار اشتباهی که در مورد عکسهای قبلی مرتکب شدید خواهد شد. اجازه دهید روال طبیعی این موضوع طی شود. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan جناب بنده مطمئنم کار درست را انجام میدهم. در دو جا اشتباه کردم که خود اعتراف کردم و مطمئن باشید تکرار نخواهند شد و این رویکردتان در اینجا را واقعاً متوجه نشدم؛ درخواست حذف دادم ولی باید حذف سریع میشدند! به هرحال پیروز باشید {{User|POS78}} talk 18:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- وقتی شما زحمت چک کردن منبع را به خود ندادید و عکس بدون مشکل را برچسب حذف سریع زدهاید به هیچ وجه نباید از کار خود *مطمئن* باشید. عکسی که لینک کردید هم تولید دفتر خبرگزاری تسنیم در بجنورد است و مشکلی ندارد، اما مجدداً دلیل برداشتن برچسب را متوجه نیستید. با توجه به این که به تمام موارد مطرحشده در این بحث (که هنوز پرونده آن باز است) التفاتی ندارید بنده در صورت ادامه برچسبزنیهای شما چارهای جز این نخواهم داشت که موضوع را به نحو مقتضی در جای دیگری مطرح و پیگیری کنم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan گویا بین ما اختلاف نظر است و با رویکرد کاربر:سلطان قلبها عزیز بنده متقاعد شدم از این به بعد بجای درخواست حذف سریع؛ تنها درخواست حذف معمولی بدهم. پیروز باشید {{User|POS78}} talk 08:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- این اختلاف نظر من و شما نیست، عدم تطابق عملکرد شما با قواعد و عرف است. معیارهای حذف مشخص هستند و استناد به رویکرد فلانی معنایی ندارد، ایشان طبق همان معیارها و بنا به تجربهاش به درستی تشخیص داد و فایلهایی که جنابعالی برچسب حذف سریع زده بودید را نهتنها به صورت کلی آندیلیت کرد، بلکه تعداد زیادی از آنها را هم وریفای کرد. قانعشدن و تمکین دو چیز متفاوت هستند. اسم این کار، یعنی رفتن سراغ فایلی که من یک ماه پیش نامزد حرف کردم، پاک کردن تمپلیت نامزدی بستهنشده و برچسب حذف سریع به آن زدن را هم نمیدانم چه بگذارم. البته یکی دو مورد هم نیست، حداقل چهار فایل دیگر هم دیدم (منجمله این فایل با پرونده باز متعلق به سه ماه پیش) که جنابعالی تصمیم گرفتید تا این بلا را به سرشان بیاورید. در هر صورت این کار دو چیز را نشان میدهد، اول ناآشنایی شما با قواعد و روال کاری حذف فایل، و دوم این که آن کار یک اتفاق رندوم نبوده و حتماً غرضی دارد. اشکالی ندارد که آدم به قوانین وارد نباشد، من هم خیلی چیزها را بلد نبوده و نیستم، اما این که در عین ناآشنایی آدم به خودش *مطمئن* باشد امر مثبتی تلقی نمیشود. به جز من یک کاربر دیگر هم برای شما پیام گذاشت و توضیحاتی داد، اما جنابعالی اصرار دارید که آنها را در سطل زباله بیندازید و به دیگران بیاحترامی کنید. احترام با صرف نوشتن تعارفاتی مانند «پیروز باشید» یا «تشکرمندم» در پایان پیام به وجود نمیآید، اینجا یک پروژه گروهی و داوطلبانه است و اگر قرار باشد هر کسی وسط تصمیمگیری جمعی به میل خودش عمل کند قطعاً محیط سازندهای برای رسیدن به هدف مشترک به وجود نخواهد آمد. من برای شما دوستانه و صمیمانه پیام گذاشتم و موضوع را با ذکر مثالهای مختلف توضیح دادم، اما وقتی آدم میبیند که طرف مقابل در واکنش به اشتباه گوشزد شده میگوید «دوباره خودتان آپلود کنید!» باید بفهمد که طرف مقابل برای زمان و زحمت دیگران ارزشی قائل نیست. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- از لحن تند شما متشکرم. گاهی باید چک بخوری تا راه درست را بروی! :) {{User|POS78}} talk 21:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- این اختلاف نظر من و شما نیست، عدم تطابق عملکرد شما با قواعد و عرف است. معیارهای حذف مشخص هستند و استناد به رویکرد فلانی معنایی ندارد، ایشان طبق همان معیارها و بنا به تجربهاش به درستی تشخیص داد و فایلهایی که جنابعالی برچسب حذف سریع زده بودید را نهتنها به صورت کلی آندیلیت کرد، بلکه تعداد زیادی از آنها را هم وریفای کرد. قانعشدن و تمکین دو چیز متفاوت هستند. اسم این کار، یعنی رفتن سراغ فایلی که من یک ماه پیش نامزد حرف کردم، پاک کردن تمپلیت نامزدی بستهنشده و برچسب حذف سریع به آن زدن را هم نمیدانم چه بگذارم. البته یکی دو مورد هم نیست، حداقل چهار فایل دیگر هم دیدم (منجمله این فایل با پرونده باز متعلق به سه ماه پیش) که جنابعالی تصمیم گرفتید تا این بلا را به سرشان بیاورید. در هر صورت این کار دو چیز را نشان میدهد، اول ناآشنایی شما با قواعد و روال کاری حذف فایل، و دوم این که آن کار یک اتفاق رندوم نبوده و حتماً غرضی دارد. اشکالی ندارد که آدم به قوانین وارد نباشد، من هم خیلی چیزها را بلد نبوده و نیستم، اما این که در عین ناآشنایی آدم به خودش *مطمئن* باشد امر مثبتی تلقی نمیشود. به جز من یک کاربر دیگر هم برای شما پیام گذاشت و توضیحاتی داد، اما جنابعالی اصرار دارید که آنها را در سطل زباله بیندازید و به دیگران بیاحترامی کنید. احترام با صرف نوشتن تعارفاتی مانند «پیروز باشید» یا «تشکرمندم» در پایان پیام به وجود نمیآید، اینجا یک پروژه گروهی و داوطلبانه است و اگر قرار باشد هر کسی وسط تصمیمگیری جمعی به میل خودش عمل کند قطعاً محیط سازندهای برای رسیدن به هدف مشترک به وجود نخواهد آمد. من برای شما دوستانه و صمیمانه پیام گذاشتم و موضوع را با ذکر مثالهای مختلف توضیح دادم، اما وقتی آدم میبیند که طرف مقابل در واکنش به اشتباه گوشزد شده میگوید «دوباره خودتان آپلود کنید!» باید بفهمد که طرف مقابل برای زمان و زحمت دیگران ارزشی قائل نیست. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan گویا بین ما اختلاف نظر است و با رویکرد کاربر:سلطان قلبها عزیز بنده متقاعد شدم از این به بعد بجای درخواست حذف سریع؛ تنها درخواست حذف معمولی بدهم. پیروز باشید {{User|POS78}} talk 08:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- وقتی شما زحمت چک کردن منبع را به خود ندادید و عکس بدون مشکل را برچسب حذف سریع زدهاید به هیچ وجه نباید از کار خود *مطمئن* باشید. عکسی که لینک کردید هم تولید دفتر خبرگزاری تسنیم در بجنورد است و مشکلی ندارد، اما مجدداً دلیل برداشتن برچسب را متوجه نیستید. با توجه به این که به تمام موارد مطرحشده در این بحث (که هنوز پرونده آن باز است) التفاتی ندارید بنده در صورت ادامه برچسبزنیهای شما چارهای جز این نخواهم داشت که موضوع را به نحو مقتضی در جای دیگری مطرح و پیگیری کنم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan جناب بنده مطمئنم کار درست را انجام میدهم. در دو جا اشتباه کردم که خود اعتراف کردم و مطمئن باشید تکرار نخواهند شد و این رویکردتان در اینجا را واقعاً متوجه نشدم؛ درخواست حذف دادم ولی باید حذف سریع میشدند! به هرحال پیروز باشید {{User|POS78}} talk 18:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- برچسبزدن به عکسهای تسنیم را متوقف کنید، این کار همانطور که توضیح دادم نه تنها کمکی به پروژه نمیکند بلکه احتمالاً منجر به تکرار اشتباهی که در مورد عکسهای قبلی مرتکب شدید خواهد شد. اجازه دهید روال طبیعی این موضوع طی شود. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan متوجه منظورتان نشدم. لطفاً شفافتر بفرمایید. متشکرم {{User|POS78}} talk 18:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- از پاسخ شما بعد از این همه توضیح متعجب شدم، و از آن عجیبتر این است که همچنان در حال ادامه دادن به کار خود هستید. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan ببینید وقتی تصویری نام عکاس آن مشخص نباشد و تنها تصویر در یک خبرگزاری گذاشته باشد طرف بررسیکننده مطمئن میشود که این یک نقض حق تکثیر است چراکه حتی نام عکاس آن را نگذاشتند و از جایی حتماً نه فقط گوگل بلکه حتی در شبکات اجتماعی تصاویر وجود دارند؛ تنها برای استفاده خبریشان نقض حق تکثیر صورت میدهند و نباید ما آنان را در ویکیانبار بارگذاری کنیم. در مورد تصاویر رژه نیروهای مسلح استان لرستان و مراسم رژه یگانهای نظامی و انتظامی گیلان بنده در تعجبم که درخواست حذفشان را دادهام؛ واقعاً چنین بودهاست؟ لطفاً درخواست آندیلیتشدنشان را بدهید؛ اگر هم پیدا نمیشوند خودتان بارگذاریشان کنید بنده تأییدشان خواهم ساخت. مشکرمندم {{User|POS78}} talk 17:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- نقض کپیرایت وقتی میتواند دلیل برچسب حذف سریع باشد که یا فایل قبلاً تخلف تشخیص داده شده باشد (G4) یا این که تخلف آن محرز و واضح باشد (F1) مثلاً عکس از جایی برداشته شده باشه که لایسنس آزاد نداره. به نظرم در مورد نامزدی حذفی که لینک کردید هم شایسته بود که بعد از عرضی که بنده اینجا مطرح کردم، صبر کنید تا بحث به نتیجهای برسه. بگذریم. عکسهایی که لینکشون قرمز شده منبعشون اینجا و اینجا بوده که صریحاً اسم عکاسهای فوق رو ذکر کرده. باید درخواستی برای آندیلیتشدن این فایلها ارائه بشه تا مجدداً در نامزدی برای حذف تصمیمگیری بشه. عدم آشنایی با زبان هیچ اشکال خاصی نداره، من زیاد دیدم که کاربران کامانز مثلاً به زبان آلمانی یا روسی با همدیگه صحبت میکنند (کما این که ما هم اینجا فارسی حرف میزنیم) یا در نظرخواهیها رای میدن، مهم اینه که همه خواستار کمک به کامانز باشیم که هستیم، مطرح کردن موارد در جمع میتونه به زبانهای مختلف صورت بگیره. عرض من اینجا از مطرح کردن صحبت ادمینی که لایسنس تسنیم رو ساخته، ناظر به این هست که در قضاوت در مورد وضعیت کپیرایت یک عکس باید به شواهد و قرائن توجه کرد که خود شما هم این نکته رو قبول کردید، بنابراین ظاهراً اختلاف نظری از این بابت نداریم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- جسارتاً تصاویری که بنده درخواست حذف سریعشان کردم طبق نقض حق تکثیر صورت گرفته لطفاً دوباره اینجا را بخوانید! اگه بنده شکی داشته باشم اینگونه عمل میکنم و نامزد برای حذف میکنم. در مورد حذف عکسهای کامین ملکی و زهرا رستگار متوجه نشدم! میشود منبعشان را بدهید؟ متشکرم. در مورد این تصویر هم خودتان گفتید به چه دلیلی تأیید کردم. درکل نام عکاس در واترمارک ملاک میباشد و استثنا آن نام عکاس در منبع خبرگزاری است در غیر این صورت تصویر باید حذف گردد هرچند بنظرم بند دوم باید به الگوی مجوز تسنینم و دیگر الگوها اضافه گردد که به شما گفتم آن را به اجماع برسانید؛ من کمی با معاشرت با زبان انگلیسی ضعیف هستم مگر نه خودم انجامش میدادم حتی زمان درخواست برای دسترسیام به این اشاره کردم انگلیسی را خوب نمیدانم. همچنین از کاربر:هنوز درخواست دارم به ما کمک کند تا موضوع مجوزهای این تصاویر را شفاف سازیم. مجدداً تشکر از دغدغهمندیتان {{User|POS78}} talk 16:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- جایی که سرنوشت صدها فایل به یک تصمیم واحد برمیگردد که قابلمناقشه خواهد بود، منطقی این است که از روال عادی استفاده شود تا اولاً فرصت کافی برای آپلودکننده جهت پاسخگویی فراهم باشد و ثانیاً روال حذف و بحثهای انجامشده برای استفاده آینده مستندسازی شود. از نظر من تصمیم شما در زدن برچسب حذف سریع (به جای نامزدی برای حذف) با هیچکدام از معیارها سازگاری ندارد، چنانچه معیار خاصی مدنظر شما بوده است لطفاً آن را ذکر کنید. همچنین به نظر من کسی که مسئولیت بازبینی لایسنس را بر عهده میگیرد نمیتواند و نباید در چنین مواردی بدون نظر باشد، چون تأیید لایسنس عملاً یک جور کارشناسی کردن است و کار کارشناسی هم با دقت و قضاوت همراه است. کما این که بالاتر هم تلویحاً پذیرفتید که عکسهای کامین ملکی و زهرا رستگار که برچسب حذف سریع زدهبودید و الآن حذف شدهاند، مشکل کپیرایتی نداشتهاند. یا مثلاً در مورد این عکس که شما اخیراً تأیید کردید و برای بنده هم تشکر سیستمی فرستادید، در واترمارک اسم عکاس ذکر نشده اما تصور من این است که شما با توجه به حضور حسین ظهروند (عکاس خبرگزاری تسنیم) در این مراسم و ذکر صریح اسمش در گالری و واترمارک سایر عکسهای مربوطه، اینطور تشخیص دادهاید که این عکس توسط منبع خلق شده و مشکلی ندارد. طبق آن چیزی که من در کامانز تجربه کردم، هدف غایی تمامی بحثها و اجماعسازیها این است که آزاد بودن یا نبودن یک فایل را تشخیص بدهیم، نه این که بخواهیم قوانینی فراتر از قوانین کپیرایت یا کامانز وضع کرده و آنها را وحی منزل تلقی کنیم. این درسی است که سال گذشته من از نامزدکردن تعداد زیادی از عکسهای محمد آگاه برای حذف گرفتم. آخر کار برخلاف انتظارم نه تنها فایلهای نامزدشده باقی ماند، بلکه تمامی فایلهای حذفشده در سالیان گذشته هم طی بحثی که با حضور چند ادمین صورت گرفت آندیلیت شدند. درباره جمله مورد بحث در لایسنس تسنیم هم قبلاً بحثهایی صورت گرفته، منجمله در این نامزدی حذف که منجر به حفظ عکسها شد. بعد از این ماجرا من در صفحه مربوط به لایسنس تسنیم موضوع را مطرح کردم و ادمینی که آن جمله را به تمپلیت اضافه کرده پاسخ جالبی داد: Template talk:Tasnim. نهایتاً این که منظور از آن جمله این بوده که لایسنس برای عکس دارای واترمارک برقرار است ولی برای عکس بدون واترمارک *لزوماً* برقرار نیست. این فرق دارد با این که بگوییم هر عکسی که واترمارک ندارد این لایسنس در مورد آن صادق نیست. از توجه شما ممنونم. با نجدید احترام، HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan آقا چرا درخواست برای دسترسی بازرس مجوز نمیدهید؟ مسلماً از بنده مناسبتر هستید. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 10:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- سلام، از محبت شما خیلی ممنونم. راستش را بخواهید به نظرم کار سختی هست. شما هم بابت این کار زحمات زیادی در چند وقت اخیر کشیدید و من به نوبه خودم از بازبینی این همه تصویر از شما ممنونم، شک ندارم که به زودی بسیار مسلط خواهید شد. یک خواهش هم داشتم که این کتگوری را با اولویت بالاتری بازبینی کنید، چون این عکسها به سختی پیدا شده و ممکن است با به وجود آمدن یک مشکل برای همیشه از دست بروند. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan سخت که نه! خیلی خستهکنندهست؛ مخصوصاً برای بنده که در روز هزار تصویر را بررسی مینمایم. ولی شما که مثل بنده شتابی ندارید میتوانید در روز ۳۰ تصویر را بررسی کنید. حتماً درخواست بدهید. دلیل شتاب بنده هم این است ممکن است در آینده بدلیل تعداد زیاد تصاویر شخصی نظر بر حذف همگی تصاویر هنوز بررسینشده بدهد و بقیه هم تأیید کننش در این صورت یک کار خیلی سخت به راحتی در یک روز حل میشود. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 11:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- سلام، از محبت شما خیلی ممنونم. راستش را بخواهید به نظرم کار سختی هست. شما هم بابت این کار زحمات زیادی در چند وقت اخیر کشیدید و من به نوبه خودم از بازبینی این همه تصویر از شما ممنونم، شک ندارم که به زودی بسیار مسلط خواهید شد. یک خواهش هم داشتم که این کتگوری را با اولویت بالاتری بازبینی کنید، چون این عکسها به سختی پیدا شده و ممکن است با به وجود آمدن یک مشکل برای همیشه از دست بروند. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan تنها ۲۵۰۰ تصویر باقی ماندهاست که اکثرا تصاویر بارگذاری شده توسط خودم هستند. این یعنی در یک ماه تقریباً بیست هزار تصویر را بررسی مجوز کردهام. متشکرم در این مدت در کنار بنده بودید {{User|POS78}} talk 13:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan قابل توجهیتان. {{User|POS78}} talk 07:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan درود خدمتِ دوست گرامیام. آقا حال و احوالتان؟ خوشبختانه کار اولیهٔ بنده با تصاویر فارس، تسنیم و مهر به پایان رسیده است. در این مدت بنده شتابزده عمل کرده و شما راهنما و استادی خوب برایم بودید. ممنونم! بهدلیل شتابزدگی بندهٔ کهتر مسلماً امکان خطا در بررسی مجوزها صفر نیست؛ اگر موردی را ملاحظه نمودید لطفاً به بنده خبر دهید یا خودتان اشتباه را تصحیح کنید. درضمن تصاویر نیازمند به بررسی مجوز خبرگزاری تسنیم واقعاً دارند زیاد میشوند. شما میتوانید با یک حرکت انقلابی و سریع در عرض دو هفته به کمترین حالت برسانید. چراکه اکثرشان را خودم آپلود کردم و زیاد وقت نمیبرد. بازم ممنونم که همراهم بودید تا دهها هزار تصویر را بتوانم بررسی مجوز کنم. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 10:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- User:POS78. سلام. محبت دارید من کار خاصی نکردم، بابت زحماتی که میکشید هم تشکر میکنم. چشم سعی میکنم به مرور عکسها را بازبینی کنم. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeminKurdistan (talk • contribs) 12:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- ارادتمندم. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 12:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- User:POS78. سلام. محبت دارید من کار خاصی نکردم، بابت زحماتی که میکشید هم تشکر میکنم. چشم سعی میکنم به مرور عکسها را بازبینی کنم. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeminKurdistan (talk • contribs) 12:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Recent Tasnim license reviews
[edit]Hi POS78, thank you very much for license reviewing hundreds of files from Tasnim News. Per Category:Tasnimnews review needed, there are over twenty thousand Tasnim photos needing license review. Many gallery pages from Fars, Mehr, Moj, SNN, and Tasnim have gone offline, so license reviews are very important and your reviews are are greatly appreciated.
You've deleted about a hundred files so far for non-compliance with a line in the {{Tasnim}} tag requiring a named photographer. However, that sentence is based on an old discussion from 2016 that I believe no longer reflects current consensus. We now have good evidence that Tasnim News regularly publishes photos without photographer specific attribution, as compiled on a page created by HeminKurdistan here: User:HeminKurdistan/Tasnim. In addition, many files from Tasnim News not credited to a photographer have passed license review, such as File:Aftermath of anti-government protests in Bojnord, Iran (01).jpg and File:Abdolmalek Rigi in Islamic Revolutionary Court.jpg.
In the future, if you want to delete photos for lacking a photographer credit, I would appreciate if you do so via the nomination for deletion process so the deletion can be discussed. Again, thanks for your efforts!
Streamline8988 (talk) 01:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Streamline8988: Not to butt into the discussion, but if the sentence in the guideline doesn't reflect the current consensus then why hasn't it been changed to reflect that? You can't really blame someone for following the wording in a template and if it's wrong in any way, then it should be changed to reflect the current situation. Otherwise people are obviously going to follow the current phrasing. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: It wasn't really a priority before because there was only about 1 Tasnim license review per day. Once it became an issue I tried to update the English license, as seen here [1], but it was reverted by POS78 without an explanation. Streamline8988 (talk) 03:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- I can understand that. They probably reverted you because changes to wording in the guidelines are supposed to be discussed beforehand. More so with changing the wording of a template though. But it doesn't look there's a discussion on the template talk page. So it makes sense to revert the edit until then. Although who knows if that's why your edit was reverted, but I assume it is. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 This was actually brought into attention at the talkpage (Template talk:Tasnim#Proposing a change in the template) and the user who added the sentence in question to the template confirmed that the consensus back in 2016 was not different from what Streamline8988 says. The 2016 discussion was based on an argument by User:Stefan2 (with four other users agreeing), "Make it more clear from the template that there are lots of images on the website which are not covered by Tasnim." Actually we do agree with that too, but the sentence in the template is somewhat obscure and being understood different from what it meant to be. The consensus was clearly not that every file from Tasnim without a watermark or credit is considered copyvio. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- No here has or is proposing to delete "every file from Tasnim without a watermark or credit." So I'm not really sure what your talking about. Regardless, I could really less what the wording of the guideline is or what you think it should be changed to. I merely said the changes should be discussed before being made. Sure, there's a conversation taking place, but changes should be made after it's concluded and neither you or Streamline8988 seemed to have commented on it after they started this discussion. So I don't really see what the issue here is. Just give the conversation a little more time for other people to comment, conclude it, and then make the changes. That's it. Just don't make them before the discussion even happens or has a clear outcome. That's all I'm saying. It isn't that big of a deal to wait until there's more then a few participants and a clear consensus before changing something. Otherwise don't be surprised if your edits get reverted. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 Fair enough. Is there any way to give momentum to the discussion and engage more users? HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Posting about on the Copyright board might help. Otherwise you could the Village Pump or discussion page for Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iran. The discussion pages of guidelines tend to not be very active though. So your best bet is probably the main Copyright Board, Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright is suitable, Be sure to create a discussion. {{User|POS78}} talk 11:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Posting about on the Copyright board might help. Otherwise you could the Village Pump or discussion page for Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iran. The discussion pages of guidelines tend to not be very active though. So your best bet is probably the main Copyright Board, Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 Fair enough. Is there any way to give momentum to the discussion and engage more users? HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- No here has or is proposing to delete "every file from Tasnim without a watermark or credit." So I'm not really sure what your talking about. Regardless, I could really less what the wording of the guideline is or what you think it should be changed to. I merely said the changes should be discussed before being made. Sure, there's a conversation taking place, but changes should be made after it's concluded and neither you or Streamline8988 seemed to have commented on it after they started this discussion. So I don't really see what the issue here is. Just give the conversation a little more time for other people to comment, conclude it, and then make the changes. That's it. Just don't make them before the discussion even happens or has a clear outcome. That's all I'm saying. It isn't that big of a deal to wait until there's more then a few participants and a clear consensus before changing something. Otherwise don't be surprised if your edits get reverted. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 This was actually brought into attention at the talkpage (Template talk:Tasnim#Proposing a change in the template) and the user who added the sentence in question to the template confirmed that the consensus back in 2016 was not different from what Streamline8988 says. The 2016 discussion was based on an argument by User:Stefan2 (with four other users agreeing), "Make it more clear from the template that there are lots of images on the website which are not covered by Tasnim." Actually we do agree with that too, but the sentence in the template is somewhat obscure and being understood different from what it meant to be. The consensus was clearly not that every file from Tasnim without a watermark or credit is considered copyvio. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- I can understand that. They probably reverted you because changes to wording in the guidelines are supposed to be discussed beforehand. More so with changing the wording of a template though. But it doesn't look there's a discussion on the template talk page. So it makes sense to revert the edit until then. Although who knows if that's why your edit was reverted, but I assume it is. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: It wasn't really a priority before because there was only about 1 Tasnim license review per day. Once it became an issue I tried to update the English license, as seen here [1], but it was reverted by POS78 without an explanation. Streamline8988 (talk) 03:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Mount Aria and...
[edit]Fixed Mount Aria. Please put your asks here under your talk page, not under files, otherwise it may be lost. We had discussion about Kashmar–Torbat Mountains and I can not find it any more. --Orijentolog (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Ok thanks.
- Kuhsorkh Mountains (talk)
- Arslan Jazeb Mausoleum (talk)
- Imamzadeh Hamzah (Eshqabad, Razavi Khorasan) (talk)
- Yavari Castle (talk)
- Modarres Hospital (Kashmar) (talk)
- also:
- File:Kashmar2023-12-16 2.jpg (Kashmar Municipality?)
- File:Kashmar2023-12-17 19.jpg (Hazrat Abolfazl Hospital (Kashmar)?) {{User|POS78}} talk 11:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Can you create Template:Natural monuments in Iran like Template:Cultural Heritage Iran?[2][3] {{User|POS78}} talk 09:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. :) I will, but later. --Orijentolog (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog File:Arghavan-valley-Bardaskan.jpg (Category:Cercis Valley (Bardaskan County)?)[4] {{User|POS78}} talk 18:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Do you not check these items? {{User|POS78}} talk 11:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not yet, you'll have to wait a little more. My plan is to complete Tehran, few more details in Isfahan and Mazandaran, then come to Razavi Khorasan and pass all once again. A the moment, I passed 385 buildings and 315 streets in Tehran. That's 700! If we also add parks, gardens, squares, neighborhoods... that's 900 locations in total. For now, because I should pass tens of things more, and likely it will pass over 1000 locations. Just imagine how hard was to identify all these photos, check mistakes, find data for infoboxes, etc. So I hope you forgive me delays Mr. Ostandar! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 09:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog bezan, roshan shi. araq kashmar! :) {{User|POS78}} talk 11:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog I'm tired of waiting. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 21:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- I was thinking about you today, and now you message me. Dadaaash. Wait a little bit more. :( :) --Orijentolog (talk) 21:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{User|POS78}} talk 21:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- File:Fossil valleys of Kashmar2023-12-17.jpg (Abgarm Valley (Kashmar)?)[5] {{User|POS78}} talk 11:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Can you check the Abgarm Valley sooner? {{User|POS78}} talk 15:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will this days for sure, no worry. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 16:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also, please check the categories of Anabad, Farg Qaleh, Kashmar and Rivash. Thank you {{User|POS78}} talk 22:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog File:Yazd2024-03-19 12.jpg (Mehriz Gate Ab Anbar?)[6] {{User|POS78}} talk 18:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done :) --Orijentolog (talk) 14:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog I love you my brother. :) Please also check Abgarm Valley. {{User|POS78}} talk 15:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- File:دیوانخوی(1).jpg (Kuhmish Mountains?)[7][8] {{User|POS78}} talk 11:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- File:طبیعت رشته کوه جغتای.jpg (Joghatai Mountains?)[9] {{User|POS78}} talk 19:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- File:Anabad2024-04-28 7.jpg (Imamzadeh Hashem (Anabad)?)[10] {{User|POS78}} talk 19:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- File:Estir Tomb 01.jpg (Pir Estir Mausoleum?)[11] {{User|POS78}} talk 19:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- File:Faghih Sabzevari Tomb 01.jpg (Musa Faqih Sabzevar Mausoleum?)[12] {{User|POS78}} talk 19:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog chi bud, chi shod! {{User|POS78}} talk 12:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I still didn't completed planned for Tehran and I knew you're be mad! Bebakhshid, midunam, harumzadeh-ye tanbal hastam. :( :) --Orijentolog (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog lanati be khodet bi-ehterami nakon. I'm just a very hasty person :) {{User|POS78}} talk 13:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:New Jameh Mosque of Bardaskan2022-01-24.jpg (New Jameh Mosque of Bardaskan?) {{User|POS78}} talk 01:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I still didn't completed planned for Tehran and I knew you're be mad! Bebakhshid, midunam, harumzadeh-ye tanbal hastam. :( :) --Orijentolog (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done :) --Orijentolog (talk) 14:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will this days for sure, no worry. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 16:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was thinking about you today, and now you message me. Dadaaash. Wait a little bit more. :( :) --Orijentolog (talk) 21:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not yet, you'll have to wait a little more. My plan is to complete Tehran, few more details in Isfahan and Mazandaran, then come to Razavi Khorasan and pass all once again. A the moment, I passed 385 buildings and 315 streets in Tehran. That's 700! If we also add parks, gardens, squares, neighborhoods... that's 900 locations in total. For now, because I should pass tens of things more, and likely it will pass over 1000 locations. Just imagine how hard was to identify all these photos, check mistakes, find data for infoboxes, etc. So I hope you forgive me delays Mr. Ostandar! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 09:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. :) I will, but later. --Orijentolog (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Is Template:Amin al-Tojar Caravanserai-year good? If not, tell me to request deletion. I feel like I made some big mistakes! lanat be man. :( {{User|POS78}} talk 16:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's fine, but I don't like to see such categories separated only by years. It's useless, reminds me of Chyah. Buildings should be separated by architectural elements at first, not only by years. I suggest to not open more of such categories. --Orijentolog (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Also check out this category, it's horrible! {{User|POS78}} talk 16:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I know, a lot of photos, and I planned to solve it. Not by years, but by elements. --Orijentolog (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok bro. Thanks :) {{User|POS78}} talk 00:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I know, a lot of photos, and I planned to solve it. Not by years, but by elements. --Orijentolog (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:Kashmar2024-06-16 4.jpg (Iran Cinema (Kashmar)?)[13] {{User|POS78}} talk 14:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog 2024 Kashmar earthquake! :) {{User|POS78}} talk 23:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:2024 Kashmar earthquake - Mehr News Agency 2.jpg (Zendeh Jan, Iran after the 2024 Kashmar earthquake?) {{User|POS78}} talk 00:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Na, we don't have "after earthquake" categories. Just the major earthquake category (2024 Kashmar earthquake) and the village category (Zendeh Jan, Iran). It's enough. --Orijentolog (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok bro. {{User|POS78}} talk 09:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog The situation in Kashmar is still critical. I think the earthquake will kill me soon! Please check the things I mentioned above before my possible death so that I can die happy. Yes! your help makes me happy. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 15:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, no and no! It won't kill you. Luckily for you that you know the best expert for earthquakes in Iran (see this: sh:Potresi u Iranu). So trust me! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 16:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog You are super awesome But at the end of the 20th century, when Japanese experts came to this area and the Doruneh Fault, They said things that were also said about Tehran! See also here. This earthquake was a joke and killed four people! If a strong earthquake comes, how do you want to say that I will not die? All experts believe that an earthquake like Bam will hit this city And the houses of Kashmar seem to belong to 100 years ago! No, no and no, You can't convince me that the probability of my death is zero Because I know it's not like that. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 17:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- So you believe Japanese experts, not me? I never felt so insulted in my life! :( --Orijentolog (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog No, my dear! You got it wrong. I am saying that the group of scientific and practical experts had a complete investigation and thoroughly investigated this area for many weeks and this is while you did not even come to my area. Either way, I'm excited and scared. I am in a country where the president is lost and in pieces. And I must say, don't be upset with me because I am ignorant and the god of emotional and wrong words. If I invite you to Kashmar, will you accept and come? I was born in 2003, don't expect a man with a big mustache. {{User|POS78}} talk 23:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again nooooo, you got all wrong, I was only joking. :) Of course I accept, one day I'll really come. You know I must personally inspect Kashmar to check did you make mistakes with categorizing photos! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog You make me happy, but I will take you to Nay Tepe Because it is the most important place in Kashmar in the field of archeology and is still unknown. You will be surprised to see there. Something like a Shahr-e Sukhteh in northeastern Iran?! It surprised the Italians badly and when it was nationally registered, no one noticed it because it's not a common thing. {{User|POS78}} talk 23:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again nooooo, you got all wrong, I was only joking. :) Of course I accept, one day I'll really come. You know I must personally inspect Kashmar to check did you make mistakes with categorizing photos! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog No, my dear! You got it wrong. I am saying that the group of scientific and practical experts had a complete investigation and thoroughly investigated this area for many weeks and this is while you did not even come to my area. Either way, I'm excited and scared. I am in a country where the president is lost and in pieces. And I must say, don't be upset with me because I am ignorant and the god of emotional and wrong words. If I invite you to Kashmar, will you accept and come? I was born in 2003, don't expect a man with a big mustache. {{User|POS78}} talk 23:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- So you believe Japanese experts, not me? I never felt so insulted in my life! :( --Orijentolog (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog You are super awesome But at the end of the 20th century, when Japanese experts came to this area and the Doruneh Fault, They said things that were also said about Tehran! See also here. This earthquake was a joke and killed four people! If a strong earthquake comes, how do you want to say that I will not die? All experts believe that an earthquake like Bam will hit this city And the houses of Kashmar seem to belong to 100 years ago! No, no and no, You can't convince me that the probability of my death is zero Because I know it's not like that. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 17:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, no and no! It won't kill you. Luckily for you that you know the best expert for earthquakes in Iran (see this: sh:Potresi u Iranu). So trust me! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 16:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Na, we don't have "after earthquake" categories. Just the major earthquake category (2024 Kashmar earthquake) and the village category (Zendeh Jan, Iran). It's enough. --Orijentolog (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:Kashmar2024-06-18 15.jpg (Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (Kashmar)?)[14]ّ[15] {{User|POS78}} talk 19:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:Kashmar County in Mehr News Agency 5.webm (Kashmar Governorate?)[16] {{User|POS78}} talk 19:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog File:Cedar of Kashmar Artistic and Cultural Complex.JPG (Cultural and artistic assembly of Cypress of Kashmar?) Please tell me the correct name quickly. Thank you {{User|POS78}} talk 15:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Cypress of Kashmar Art and Culture Complex. --Orijentolog (talk) 17:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK. Tomorrow, if there is no problem, I will go to this place and take pictures. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 17:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Cypress of Kashmar Art and Culture Complex2024-07-02.jpg. {{User|POS78}} talk 14:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Cypress of Kashmar Art and Culture Complex. --Orijentolog (talk) 17:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog File:Mansuriyeh2023-07-14.jpg (Ghiasi House?)[17] {{User|POS78}} talk 12:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- I should check Iranarchpedia first, and then I will make it. Speaking of it, I didn't know for Iranarchpedia until you told me some three years ago. You really are an ostad and I'm dumb daneshju. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 18:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, you're not right, I'm Ralph and you're correcting my mistakes! So you are my wise ostad. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 19:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Dahmohamad1.jpg (Deh-e Mohammad Caravanserai?)[18][19] {{User|POS78}} talk 15:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done :) You see, it's going, one by one! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 20:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 06:33, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done :) You see, it's going, one by one! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 20:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- I should check Iranarchpedia first, and then I will make it. Speaking of it, I didn't know for Iranarchpedia until you told me some three years ago. You really are an ostad and I'm dumb daneshju. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 18:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
@Orijentolog File:Kashmar2016-10-15 6.jpg (Imam Hossein Nakhl of Banu Asad (Kashmar)?)[20][21][22][23][24] Please tell me the correct name. Thank you {{User|POS78}} talk 18:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- No need for a separate category here and such objects in general. Use only Mourning of Muharram in Kashmar and Imam Hossein Nakhl. --Orijentolog (talk) 18:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK. {{User|POS78}} talk 18:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- No need for a separate category here and such objects in general. Use only Mourning of Muharram in Kashmar and Imam Hossein Nakhl. --Orijentolog (talk) 18:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Sarpol-e Zahab County2022-07-16.jpg (Zij-e Manijeh?)[25][26] {{User|POS78}} talk 19:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Saint Sarkis Cathedral2024-01-07.jpg (Saint Sarkis Cathedral (Tabriz)?)[27] {{User|POS78}} talk 19:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Khajeh Baroukh House2022-02-19 19.jpg (Khajeh Baroukh House?)[28][29] {{User|POS78}} talk 09:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Fire in Amir Kalayeh Lagoon2022-09-03 9.jpg (Amir Kalayeh Lagoon?)[30] {{User|POS78}} talk 11:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Torbat-e Heydarieh Sugar Factory2013 18.jpg (Torbat-e Heydarieh Sugar Factory?)[31][32] {{User|POS78}} talk 12:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Isfahan2022-05-08 18.jpg (Nezam ol Eslam House?)[33] {{User|POS78}} talk 15:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Kashmar2024-06-18 9.jpg (Seyyed Morteza Linear Park?)[34] {{User|POS78}} talk 23:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog File:Khalilabad park - panoramio.jpg (Khalilabad Forest Park?)[35] {{User|POS78}} talk 17:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Can I create all these categories? I don't think you create these! {{User|POS78}} talk 18:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I will create it, don't doubt! Didn't you notice that I was recategorizing things you opened this year?? :) --Orijentolog (talk) 18:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Thank you. I was just a little disappointed. very disappointed (It's really not a little)! {{User|POS78}} talk 19:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Can you help me find the name of the river where this bridge is located? Thank you {{User|POS78}} talk 14:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps Quzhd River, but I'm not sure. I should check maps on my stronger computer. Generally, small rivers are nightmare for identifying. Do you know how do you call it in Kashmar? You should know if you're true Kashmari, not some dehati. :)) --Orijentolog (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog According to the search that I made again, the name of this river is Kal-e Quzhd. I told the informed person the name you mentioned and he confirmed it. But I and the local people know it as Kal-e Niazmand. This name was completely native, that's why I was looking for the original name. Thank you {{User|POS78}} talk 06:33, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Category:Quzhd River. {{User|POS78}} talk 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Do you think this castle belongs to which period in Iran? Do you have expertise? Is it not related to the Qajar period? {{User|POS78}} talk 23:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, we should have some source. Did you try to find some source? Is it a registered site? --Orijentolog (talk) 11:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog No, unfortunately. It's just a forgotten castle. I discovered it myself and just asked an old person its name. {{User|POS78}} talk 13:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Can you give a comment? Conjecture also helps me. Because I don't know anything about it except its name. :( {{User|POS78}} talk 22:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I edited it a little. I found out that place is called "Abol-Qasemi" on GeoNames, so I renamed it as it is stronger source than personal data from a villager. :) It seems correct because I have also found more sources about that place (former village or farm). I hope we'll see more sources in future. There's no need for our estimation about periods, inserting castles in Iran of unknown century is enough. --Orijentolog (talk) 04:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 09:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- I edited it a little. I found out that place is called "Abol-Qasemi" on GeoNames, so I renamed it as it is stronger source than personal data from a villager. :) It seems correct because I have also found more sources about that place (former village or farm). I hope we'll see more sources in future. There's no need for our estimation about periods, inserting castles in Iran of unknown century is enough. --Orijentolog (talk) 04:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, we should have some source. Did you try to find some source? Is it a registered site? --Orijentolog (talk) 11:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps Quzhd River, but I'm not sure. I should check maps on my stronger computer. Generally, small rivers are nightmare for identifying. Do you know how do you call it in Kashmar? You should know if you're true Kashmari, not some dehati. :)) --Orijentolog (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- I will create it, don't doubt! Didn't you notice that I was recategorizing things you opened this year?? :) --Orijentolog (talk) 18:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
احوال پرسی
[edit]سلام و عرض ادب. خوبید همشهری؟ می بینم که هنوز فعال هستید. چه خبرا؟ Black GlobuleTalk 05:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @گلبول سیاه: سلام و درود فراوان. به به خوش برگشتی ای دوست قدیمی! انشاءالله که قصد ماندن دارید؟ شکر میگذرد هرچند با سختی. خودتان خوبید؟ خوشید؟ سلامتیت؟ چخبر؟ پیشرفتهایی در زندگیتان داشتید؟ {{User|POS78}} talk 08:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- انجام شد. File:Central District of Kashmar.svg File:Farahdasht District of Kashmar.svg File:Kashmar county 2024.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by گلبول سیاه (talk • contribs) 20:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @گلبول سیاه: چه نقشه های زیبایی. {{User|POS78}} talk 21:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @گلبول سیاه: جسارتاً نقشه های دهستانها را یادتان رفت. {{User|POS78}} talk 21:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- انجام شد. ۱ ۲ ۳ ۴ Black GlobuleTalk 08:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- عالیه! ممنون. {{User|POS78}} talk 08:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- @گلبول سیاه: همچنین آیا میشود مانند این نقشه نقشه ای برای کاشمر نیز بسازید؟ تشکر {{User|POS78}} talk 08:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- انجام شد ولی قسمت اطلاعاتش رو بهم ریختم!!File:Kashmar County colorful.svg Black GlobuleTalk 10:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- مثل همیشه بینظیر است. درستش کردم. {{User|POS78}} talk 10:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- @گلبول سیاه: اگر جسارت نیست همین نقشه ها را برای شهرستانهای دیگر ترشیز یعنی بردسکن، خلیلآباد و کوهسرخ نیز ایجاد کنید. البته عجله ای نیست! برای ماه های آینده تایمی را اختصاص دهید. دنیایی تشکر {{User|POS78}} talk 11:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- انجام شد ولی قسمت اطلاعاتش رو بهم ریختم!!File:Kashmar County colorful.svg Black GlobuleTalk 10:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- انجام شد. ۱ ۲ ۳ ۴ Black GlobuleTalk 08:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- انجام شد. File:Central District of Kashmar.svg File:Farahdasht District of Kashmar.svg File:Kashmar county 2024.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by گلبول سیاه (talk • contribs) 20:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @گلبول سیاه: سلام و درود فراوان. به به خوش برگشتی ای دوست قدیمی! انشاءالله که قصد ماندن دارید؟ شکر میگذرد هرچند با سختی. خودتان خوبید؟ خوشید؟ سلامتیت؟ چخبر؟ پیشرفتهایی در زندگیتان داشتید؟ {{User|POS78}} talk 08:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @BGlobule: با درودی فراوان. آقا جسارتاً میتوانید این نقشه را مانند این نقشه تغییر دهید تا نام و موقعیت بخشها در آن سال هم مشخص شوند؟ ممنون {{User|POS78}} talk 12:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- سلام. انشاءالله تابستان. Black GlobuleTalk 12:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- @BGlobule: بابت مزاحمتهای پیدرپی پوزش میطلبم. جسارتاً قصد دارم تصاویر این رده را بروزرسانی کنم. ممکن است نقشهٔ جدید استان خراسان رضوی را بدون رنگآمیزی بارگذاری کنید؟ خودم رنگآمیزی را انجام میدهم. متشکرم {{User|POS78}} talk 20:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- سلام. سعی میکنم تا عصر بارگذاری کنم. بالاخره یاد گرفتید اینکاسکیپ را؟ یک پیشنهاد هم دارم که آیا بهتر نیست از نام فایلها و ردهها و... سال را حذف کنیم و آنها را به نام معتبر و مشخصی انتقال دهیم و سپس فقط فایلها و توضیحات آنها را تغییر دهیم؟ Black GlobuleTalk 04:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- سلام دوباره. File:Razavi Khorasan province 2024 (Colorless-Untitled).svg خدمت شما. Black GlobuleTalk 15:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @BGlobule: درود. نه چیز خاصی از اینکاسکیپ یاد ندارم، در حد همین رنگآمیزی فقط! فایلها و رده را تصحیح کردم. اگر ممکن است شما نقشهٔ موقعیتیاب میانجلگه را بارگذاری فرمایید. سپاس بیکران {{User|POS78}} talk 17:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- سلام. با تاخیر خدمت شما Black GlobuleTalk 21:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @BGlobule: درود. نه چیز خاصی از اینکاسکیپ یاد ندارم، در حد همین رنگآمیزی فقط! فایلها و رده را تصحیح کردم. اگر ممکن است شما نقشهٔ موقعیتیاب میانجلگه را بارگذاری فرمایید. سپاس بیکران {{User|POS78}} talk 17:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @BGlobule: بابت مزاحمتهای پیدرپی پوزش میطلبم. جسارتاً قصد دارم تصاویر این رده را بروزرسانی کنم. ممکن است نقشهٔ جدید استان خراسان رضوی را بدون رنگآمیزی بارگذاری کنید؟ خودم رنگآمیزی را انجام میدهم. متشکرم {{User|POS78}} talk 20:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- سلام. انشاءالله تابستان. Black GlobuleTalk 12:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mohammad Javad Pourhassan2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
186.173.93.44 20:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Correct title
[edit]@Orijentolog: دوهفتهنامه سرو کاشمر = Cypress of Kashmar Periodical?[36][37][38] I want to photograph the central building of this publication, but I don't know what is its correct name? Please tell me the correct name of the central building of this publication, thank you. {{User|POS78}} talk 15:40, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think Sarv-e Kashmar (magazine) is OK. We should not fully translate such titles, otherwise Hamshahri would be named as Fellow Citizen. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog OK. What should be the title of the file I upload? Because it is the central building. {{User|POS78}} talk 19:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sarv-e Kashmar Building if they own only one building. Otherwise, if they have several buildings (which I doubt), then Sarv-e Kashmar Central Building. --Orijentolog (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog I myself was not sure but I found out with the research I did. There is only one office. So Office of Sarv-e Kashmar? {{User|POS78}} talk 20:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, I told you, it should be Sarv-e Kashmar Building. --Orijentolog (talk) 20:57, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- {{User|POS78}} talk 21:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog I have uploaded the images. It took hours to upload eight photos! It was the worst possible place and about 200 of my photos were ruined. I want to curse the building, but it doesn't understand my curses. :( {{User|POS78}} talk 19:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Haha, take it easy. Upload less at one time, than again, and again... :) --Orijentolog (talk) 23:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog :) {{User|POS78}} talk 01:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Please create the above categories. Thanks {{User|POS78}} talk 16:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Haha, take it easy. Upload less at one time, than again, and again... :) --Orijentolog (talk) 23:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, I told you, it should be Sarv-e Kashmar Building. --Orijentolog (talk) 20:57, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog I myself was not sure but I found out with the research I did. There is only one office. So Office of Sarv-e Kashmar? {{User|POS78}} talk 20:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sarv-e Kashmar Building if they own only one building. Otherwise, if they have several buildings (which I doubt), then Sarv-e Kashmar Central Building. --Orijentolog (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog OK. What should be the title of the file I upload? Because it is the central building. {{User|POS78}} talk 19:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Is the title of this category correct or am I wrong? {{User|POS78}} talk 15:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, it's a totally irrelevant cultural context. --Orijentolog (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK. Thank you {{User|POS78}} talk 00:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog I created this category for you. I have ten times as many photos as you. :) Ivan Kuharić, are you? Or did he send you that picture? {{User|POS78}} talk 13:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I saw it. :) No, that guy just send me photo, many years ago. --Orijentolog (talk) 22:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- No, it's a totally irrelevant cultural context. --Orijentolog (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog: خیابان شهاب ترشیزی (Shahab Torshizi Street?)[39] خیابان ظهوری ترشیزی (Zuhuri Torshizi Street?)[40] I will take pictures of these two streets soon. Do you have another street in mind for me to take photos there? {{User|POS78}} talk 17:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- At the moment, put it under Streets in Kashmar. I promise I'll do the rest soon! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 22:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Ok thank you. But check Category:Shahab Torshizi and Category:Zuhuri Torshizi. In order to create these categories, I went to take pictures of these two streets. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 12:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Razi Tourism and Historical Complex?[41] {{User|POS78}} talk 11:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Please tell me the correct name! I want to upload photos. :( {{User|POS78}} talk 10:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- No need that you wait in future, name individual photos as you wish, and upload them under category Buildings in Ray. I'll do the rest later. --Orijentolog (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- At the moment, put it under Streets in Kashmar. I promise I'll do the rest soon! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 22:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Kashmar2024-08-30 44.jpg (Paradise Tourism, Culture and Educational Complex?)[42] What a difficult name! {{User|POS78}} talk 02:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Quch Palang Cemetery2024-08-31 3.jpg (Quch Palang Cemetery?) {{User|POS78}} talk 22:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Quch Palang Dam2024-08-31 15.jpg (Quch Palang Dam?)[43] {{User|POS78}} talk 22:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Quch Palang2024-08-31 53.jpg (???)[44] {{User|POS78}} talk 22:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Biglarbeigi Tekiyeh2024-03-18 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
0x0a (talk) 08:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Tomb of Sheikh Shahabuddin Ahari2024-03-21 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
0x0a (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 38.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 35.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 30.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 28.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 23.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 17.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 14.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 12.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 10.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 9.jpg
- File:Naqsh-i Jahan Square2024-03-23 28.jpg
- File:Naqsh-i Jahan Square2024-03-23 27.jpg
- File:Naqsh-i Jahan Square2024-03-23 3.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 42.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 30.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 10.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 8.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 4.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 25.jpg
Yours sincerely, 0x0a (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
So when will you help me?
[edit]@Orijentolog Here and here my requests are getting more and more. After all these months, you only promise more! If you can't create them, let me create them myself, I know very well that I am wrong, but a bad thing is better than nothing. {{User|POS78}} talk 20:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Friday or Saturday! But just things you asked, not more. I'm planning to pass ALL Razavi Khorasan once again, thousands of images. You know our Sabzevari friend opened many cultural sites with bad names, and I should correct all that. At the moment I'm stuck in Tehran, Isfahan and Mazandaran provinces, which are among the hardest ones. :( --Orijentolog (talk) 20:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Ok thank you. Why weren't you active this year? 2021 was great for you, I met you in the same year. This year was very good for me. I am working on many photos and it continues. Sometimes I am paralyzed! :) {{User|POS78}} talk 20:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I have to work! :) But I'll keep my promises to you, and edit everything you demanded. As you see, I already started. As a gift, I'll also insert all coordinates for your photos. Deal? :) --Orijentolog (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Can you kill me? I like this gift more. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 21:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Brother, I was unblocked in Persian Wikipedia! Of course, I have to go through several steps to be completely fixed But I can edit. If you need help somewhere, tell me in Persian Wikipedia. {{User|POS78}} talk 15:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Afarin, va kheyli mamnun. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- :) {{User|POS78}} talk 11:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog to bad qoltarin adami hasti ke didam. :( {{User|POS78}} talk 10:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Afarin, va kheyli mamnun. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I have to work! :) But I'll keep my promises to you, and edit everything you demanded. As you see, I already started. As a gift, I'll also insert all coordinates for your photos. Deal? :) --Orijentolog (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Ok thank you. Why weren't you active this year? 2021 was great for you, I met you in the same year. This year was very good for me. I am working on many photos and it continues. Sometimes I am paralyzed! :) {{User|POS78}} talk 20:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Dayr-e Gachin2022-02-26 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mostafameraji (talk) 12:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- درود بی پ��یان به شما کاربر سخت کوش ویکی.
- من صرفا یکی از عکسهای دیرگچین را نامزد حذف کردم تا بارگذار محترم با همان ابزاری که فرمودید (کراپ تولز) واترمارک زیر عکس را بردارند.
- عکسهای بسیار خوبی را به انبار افزودید. ارزومند بهترین ها برایتان Mostafameraji (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- درود. انجام شد.
- لطف دارید استاد. درس پس میدیم. {{User|POS78}} talk 14:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Abkuh Aliabad
[edit]@Orijentolog Please save me! I'm going crazy. Where is Abkuh Aliabad? I thought this photo was about Abkuh Aliabad. But it was not like this and I am a fool. Please help me find this residential area. Thank you brother. {{User|POS78}} talk 22:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think I found it (see Wikidata), but not 100% sure. Google maps also give Bagh-e Abkuh (باغ آبکوه) on the northeast. --Orijentolog (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog You are 100% wrong. see here. {{User|POS78}} talk 23:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog This is a good thing. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 00:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog You put wrong coordinates again. I took photos there. The name there is Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad (کلاته شاه محمد). I think it is here. There is no village there. Only a residential area is illegal. {{User|POS78}} talk 10:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Now you confused me so I don't understand anything. You mean this file is also wrong? By the way, we don't put "residential area" for anything, just village or neighborhood. --Orijentolog (talk) 11:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog The file is correct. I found out where Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad is from the file. But in the case of Abkuh Aliabad, I do not understand where it is at all. Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad or Abkuh Aliabad are not neighborhoods or villages. We call them Abadi (آبادی). Abadi is a place where people do agriculture and animal husbandry. Or they build villas, which are mostly illegal. It is really a confusing topic. :( {{User|POS78}} talk 11:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- If file is correct, then I'm correct, because I put coordinates from that file. :) No worry about terminology, we treat abadis as villages here. --Orijentolog (talk) 11:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Check the file again. I took this photo from this place (کلاته محمداباد/ کلاته شاه محمد). According to the file, Abkuh Aliabad (ابکوه علی اباد) is located in the southwest of Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad. I'm going crazy! We both make mistakes. We became like Pat and Mat. {{User|POS78}} talk 11:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- This file gives Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad here. So it's wrong? I don't know which source can we trust now! --Orijentolog (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog This is Padegan-ye Qods (پادگان قدس). Pay attention to the file. Please do not compare the file with the aerial map. This file is probably drawn by hand. {{User|POS78}} talk 13:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Abadi is so complicated. Please do not confuse them with villages. In my opinion, they should not even have an article on Wikipedia. I will say only one thing since yesterday: I'm going crazy. {{User|POS78}} talk 13:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- If you go there again, pay attention to Place name signs. That's the only solution, since all sources are so messy. We'll keep it under Kashmar County until we find something realiable. --Orijentolog (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Abadis do not have signs. :( {{User|POS78}} talk 08:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you go there again, pay attention to Place name signs. That's the only solution, since all sources are so messy. We'll keep it under Kashmar County until we find something realiable. --Orijentolog (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- This file gives Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad here. So it's wrong? I don't know which source can we trust now! --Orijentolog (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Check the file again. I took this photo from this place (کلاته محمداباد/ کلاته شاه محمد). According to the file, Abkuh Aliabad (ابکوه علی اباد) is located in the southwest of Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad. I'm going crazy! We both make mistakes. We became like Pat and Mat. {{User|POS78}} talk 11:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- If file is correct, then I'm correct, because I put coordinates from that file. :) No worry about terminology, we treat abadis as villages here. --Orijentolog (talk) 11:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog The file is correct. I found out where Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad is from the file. But in the case of Abkuh Aliabad, I do not understand where it is at all. Kalateh-ye Shah Mohammad or Abkuh Aliabad are not neighborhoods or villages. We call them Abadi (آبادی). Abadi is a place where people do agriculture and animal husbandry. Or they build villas, which are mostly illegal. It is really a confusing topic. :( {{User|POS78}} talk 11:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Now you confused me so I don't understand anything. You mean this file is also wrong? By the way, we don't put "residential area" for anything, just village or neighborhood. --Orijentolog (talk) 11:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Kalateh-ye Ahmadi
[edit]@Orijentolog What do you think of Kalateh-ye Ahmadi? What exactly is it? According to this source, Kalateh-ye Ahmadi is an unauthorized residential area. Can it be called one of the neighborhoods of Kashmar? {{User|POS78}} talk 14:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- It should be treated as neighborhood of Kashmar, I told you we don't categorize places under "residential areas". --Orijentolog (talk) 05:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. {{User|POS78}} talk 07:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog Please help me reduce the number of images in this category to zero. I'm not in a hurry. Thanks {{User|POS78}} talk 19:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't need even to ask me that, you know well I'll do it. I was doing the same with Tehran in recent days, for example with images related to Johnny Bet Oshana. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 17:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 19:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- I even found Pat and Mat in Tehran! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pat and Mat are very popular in Iran. For Nowruz, we use the statue of Pat and Mat. Later I will show you the Pat and Mat statue that was for Nowruz. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 15:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- I even found Pat and Mat in Tehran! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 19:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't need even to ask me that, you know well I'll do it. I was doing the same with Tehran in recent days, for example with images related to Johnny Bet Oshana. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 17:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Avicenna Mausoleum2021 19.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Avicenna Mausoleum2021 19.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
1989 (talk) 17:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Avicenna Mausoleum2023-08-23 20.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Avicenna Mausoleum2023-08-23 20.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |