User talk:Mummelgrummel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Arenas de Barcelona 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Florstein 08:33, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Arenas de Barcelona 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Arenas de Barcelona - oben 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 07:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Arenas de Barcelona 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Brunnen & Park am Platz Duc de Medinaceli - Details 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the shade but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Nacht - Placa Reial 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Brunnen Platz Catalunya 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Brunnen & Park am Platz Duc de Medinaceli - Details 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Brunnen & Park am Platz Duc de Medinaceli - Details 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. For this kit-lens it is ok. --Hubertl 21:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Arenas de Barcelona - oben 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Arenas de Barcelona - oben 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. But please, the user categories must be hidden. --C messier 07:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Platz Espanya 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Platz Espanya 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. good composition! --Hubertl 08:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Platz Espanya 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Brunnen & Park am Platz Duc de Medinaceli 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Ich meinte damit die Komposition ist etwas zufällig geraten und nicht gut überlegt --Moroder 19:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC) Comment[reply]
Es sieht in der Tat so besser aus :-). --Mummelgrummel 18:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Skulpturen Platz Catalunya 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Skulpturen Platz Catalunya 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Skulpturen Platz Catalunya 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Brunnen & Park am Platz Duc de Medinaceli - Details 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Works on its own terms --Daniel Case 23:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Skulpturen Platz Catalunya 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Wegweiser & Straßenschilder 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Seilbahn de Montjuic 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Seilbahn de Montjuic 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Urlaub 2014 - Skulpturen Platz Catalunya 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Platz Espanya 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment the lamps don't work in the composition IMHO... --Carschten 09:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thank you for the comment. I found especially this composition interesting. But probably you're right. --Mummelgrummel 05:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My problem is the tight lamp crop on the left and the overlapping part of the lamp on the right. But I see the interesting idea indeed. So I don't want to decide this one. --Carschten 11:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Technically it's a rather good pic and I totally get the idea with old versus new lamps in the same pic, so I'd say good enough for me. BUT once the pic is off this list, you should rename it to "Old and new lamps at Platz Espanya Barcelona" and also mention this in the description of the file. Otherwise people will think that it is a "bad" pic of the statue. I'll add some good categories to it. W.carter 18:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thank you again for commenting it. It's a pretty good idea to adopt the description of the picture and add categories to it. So I have done it. Thanks @W.carter and @Carschten. --Mummelgrummel 02:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Seilbahn de Montjuic 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Palast & Garten (Fontäne) Montjuic 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Seilbahn de Montjuic 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and sharp wheel but the blown out sky and branches spoils it. Think you can loose some of it? See note.--W.carter 10:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thank you W.carter. I followed your advice. I hope now the picture has the right cropping. --Mummelgrummel 04:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is so much better focus on the wheel now. Good quality. W.carter 07:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Castell de Montjuic 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Had something may be sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Palast & Garten (Fontäne) Montjuic 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Castell de Montjuic 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Castell de Montjuic 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Castell de Montjuic 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Castell de Montjuic 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a little bit of CA on the woman and the girl top left. Can you please fix that. --W.carter 21:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Corrected. Thank you for the hint. --Mummelgrummel 03:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 07:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Castell de Montjuic 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting composition but the surrounding unfocused ambrasure is very grainy and noisy, think you could "unsharpen" it so that it looks more like a bokeh? --W.carter 21:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I don't know exactly what you are meaning. But I tried some corrections (sharpness and contrast). I'm not sure whether the result is better. Please give me a feedback. --Mummelgrummel 03:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That was exactly what I meant. :) Good quality. --W.carter 07:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Castell de Montjuic 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry for my interfering, might I suggest that you remove the stripes in the upper right corner? --Basotxerri 18:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Done. Thank you for the hint. --Mummelgrummel 09:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona August 2014 - Castell de Montjuic 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bottom crop does not satisfy me, the chair keg is cut. Also perspective is not perfect, a bit distorted. Do you have another version? Sorry, --Michielverbeek 05:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I don't have another version but I tried some perspective corrections. I hope that works. --Mummelgrummel 09:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC) Perspective looks much better. I understand bottom crop cannot be improved, so a week support --Michielverbeek 06:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

[edit]

Hallo Mummelgrummel!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info@wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2017

[edit]

Hallo Mummelgrummel,

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) April 2017

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 23:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrichshafen - Nikolauskirche - Fenster 004.jpg

[edit]
File:Friedrichshafen - Nikolauskirche - Fenster 004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrichshafen - Nikolauskirche - Fenster 007.jpg

[edit]
File:Friedrichshafen - Nikolauskirche - Fenster 007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrichshafen - Nikolauskirche - Fenster 008.jpg

[edit]
File:Friedrichshafen - Nikolauskirche - Fenster 008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrichshafen - Nikolauskirche - Fenster 006.jpg

[edit]
File:Friedrichshafen - Nikolauskirche - Fenster 006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung ins WikiMUC und zum Münchner Wikipedia Stammtisch

[edit]
Das WikiMUC in der Angertorstraße 3

Hallo, wir schreiben Dich an, weil Du laut Deiner Benutzerseite in oder in der Umgebung von München wohnst. Vielleicht hast Du schon gehört, dass sich in München Wikipedianer auch außerhalb des Internets treffen? Es gibt einen monatlichen Stammtisch und es gibt mit dem WikiMUC einen Treffpunkt und Veranstaltungsraum für Wikipedianer.

Das WikiMUC in der Angertorstraße 3 (am Sendlinger Tor) ist auch Dein Ort! Dort kannst Du andere Wikipedianer treffen, Erfahrungen austauschen, Projekte planen, Probleme besprechen, Tee oder Kaffee trinken und Veranstaltungen besuchen oder organisieren. Es gibt diverse PCs, ein offenes WLAN, eine Fotoausrüstung – die man auch ausleihen kann – und einen schnellen DIN-A3-Buchscanner. Darüber hinaus unternehmen wir regelmäßig Exkursionen und Wanderungen. Schau einfach mal unverbindlich vorbei. Kostet nix. Verpflichtet zu nix. Wir freuen uns auf Dich!

Du triffst uns beim offenen Abend, mittwochs ab 18 Uhr und bei der Sprechstunde am Freitag von 16 bis 19 Uhr. Veranstaltungen und sonstige Treffen stehen im Kalender. Wenn Du etwa einmal im Monat über unsere Veranstalltungen informiert werden willst, trag Dich auf unserem E-Mail-Verteiler ein. -- Michael F. Schönitzer 12:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC) für das WikiMUC-Team[reply]

Hi Michael,
es ist richtig, dass ich in München wohne. Und in der Angertorstr. war ich auch schon mal ;-). Ist allerdings schon eine Weile her. Im Moment habe ich leider sowohl familienbedingt, als :auch beruflich wenig Möglichkeiten, vorbeizuschauen. Ich habe es nicht vergessen und melde mich sicher, wenn ich wieder etwas Luft habe.
Mit besten Grüßen Alexander alias --Mummelgrummel (talk) 18:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Close-up photographs by colour

[edit]

Category name misspelled.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ferry_ports

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Ferry ports has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jmabel ! talk 23:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vickers predictor photographs - CC-BY-SA license - attribution missing

[edit]

Hi. You have a created derivative works based on photographs of mine. My photographs are licensed as CC-BY-SA. Under the terms of this license you must attribute the original author correctly. Could you please edit the descriptions to attribute me as the original author?

These are the files:

File:Vickers anti-aircraft predictor.png

File:Vickers anti-aircraft predictor 2017 auf Wikipedia (freigestellt).png

Thanks,

Quilt Phase (talk) 06:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Quilt Phase,
I already had described that it is a derivative work that it bases on your work. "This is a cropped image of the original here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vickers_anti-aircraft_predictor_2017.jpg" is in the german description. Now I have added an english description and changed the source. What should I do additionally?
Best Regards
Mummelgrummel Mummelgrummel (talk) 09:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't sure so I asked for some advice. The necessary changes have been made, I hope you agree it resolves things. I had not realised one image was CC0, but I believe it's good practice to attribute authors for those too, although not strictly necessary. Quilt Phase (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mummelgrummel&oldid=944226484"