User talk:Jaqen/Archive 8

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trevor Hairsine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Salve. Sono Alessandro Pace (alex alpacigno in wikipedia/Wikimedia commons). Gentilmente se puoi eliminare qualche immagine da me inserita su Wikimedia, sono dei "doppioni".

In particolare:

• L'immagine "Arca di Guglielmo da Castelbarco 2.jpeg" in Arca_di_Guglielmo_da_Castelbarco_2 proposto da me per la cancellazione in data 11 agosto 2021. Tale errore perchè avevo utilizzato anche l'app "Wikimedia commons" su Android dimenticandomi di inserire alcuni dati EXIF, come il luogo, le descrizioni e così via. L'immagine "copia" è quella da 5.24 MB caricata alle 12:59 tramite "Commons mobile App".
• Le immagini "Moto terreno Solare" di Armando Pomodoro inserite il 20 ottobre 2020 (attenzione perchè poi avevo inserito successivamente le stesse immagini per la partecipazione al progetto "Wiki loves Monuments Italia 2021" e quindi quelle "giuste" sono state caricate il 2 settembre 2021).

La lista completa delle mie immagini è qui [(immagini caricate)]

Spero di aver scritto nel modo e nella sezione giusta. Cordiali Saluti

--Alessandro Pace (talk) 08:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Alessandro Pace (Alex alpacigno).

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marco Steiner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marianna Aprile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rocco Siffredi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - used and useful --Andrei (talk) 10:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dr. Pira.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --August Geyler (talk) 22:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Robh Ruppel - Lucca Comics & Games 2014.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Hochlader offensichtlich nicht identisch mit Urhber / Rechteinhaber - Kein Hinweis, dass Hochlader berechtigt ist, Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Lutheraner.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Robh Ruppel - Lucca Comics & Games 2014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 17:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

The photo was taken by Sergio del Grande working for the Italian Mondadori Publishers. Hence PD-Italy does apply, and it does not matter where the photo was taken (see definition of Country of Origin, which is linked from the PD-Italy template: "The country of origin shall be considered to be: .."). Hence may I ask you to undelete this file? You can nominate it for deletion, if you disagree with this Commons policy. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Emma Ríos - Lucca Comics and Games 2015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

191.126.27.253 01:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Raj Mishra 2402:3A80:1C62:F775:75ED:27EC:3C79:8D5E 02:55, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Ciao @Jaqen, forse non ti ricordi di me, ma ci conosciamo. Vorrei porti le stesse domande che ho fatto nel Bar italiano che, ahimè, sono ancora senza risposta.

1. L'Istituto nazionale Ferruccio Parri, proprietario di due siti mi ha inviato i loghi per caricarli sulla pagina di Wikipedia, quale licenza e procedura debbo usare per caricarle su Commons?
2. L'ente che ha editato una monografia riguardante la politica italiana Ada Natali (SPI CGIL Lega di Fermo), e lo scrittore del testo mi hanno autorizzato a scattare le foto di documenti storici presenti nel libro, quale licenza e procedura debbo usare per caricarle su Commons?
3. I proprietari del museo, e di tutte le opere d'arte contenute in esso, dedicato all'artista Giuseppe Pende, mi hanno autorizzato a scattare le foto dei quadri, quale licenza e procedura debbo usare per caricarle su Commons?

PS: Le immagini le avevo caricare tempo fa, ma sono state tutte cancellate perché le avevo attribuite a mia creazione... ma purtroppo con le licenze non ho dimestichezza.

Grazie Jaqen, e scusa del disturbo. Una caro saluto :-). Bella Trovata (talk) 15:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Ciao! Siamo felici di annunciarti che Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italia è iniziato. La tua partecipazione ci aiuterà a valorizzare le aree naturali protette d'Italia e mostrarle al mondo grazie a Wikipedia e agli altri progetti Wikimedia.

Visita la pagina del concorso e scopri le regole: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italy. Qui potrai scoprire come partecipare. Per qualsiasi domanda, non esitare a scriverci al seguente indirizzo: infowikilovesearth.it.

Grazie,
il team organizzatore di Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italia 01:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Stai ricevendo questo messaggio perché hai già partecipato al concorso in passato

Perché questo?--Potenza2021 (talk) 08:13, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Ok, quindi non funziona come su Wikipedia dove le voci si creano senza chiedere all'interessato?--Potenza2021 (talk) 13:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Ok, scusa ancora.--Potenza2021 (talk) 13:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Come mai le licenze sono "incompatibili" con Commons? Mi sembravano perfettamente valide.P.S: perdonami perchè non me ne intendo.....Sono Un Uomo

Sì, in effetti ho sbagliato... uso troppo spesso il copia-incolla perchè sono ancora poco esperto..>Sono Un Uomo

Dear Jaquen,

I'm Petra Seeger's assistent. We would like to know if there is any chance to delete or exchange the photo file of Petra, because she really doesn't like it any more and it is very important for her that it is not published on the internet any more. For example when you search on google for Petra Seeger the picture that is on the screen is the wikipedia photo file you once uploaded. We appreciate if you would contact us to discuss how we can solve the problem (mail@filmform.tv).

Looking forward to hear from you.

Kind regards, Melanie Bukowski

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Jaqen, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

I think what you did erasing all the images done by user:Biagio09 is a mistake. You wrote that "everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here" and this is not true. You erased even his own personal photos...indeed, I can show my own photos that appear on the web and they are not copyrighted! This is an abuse, IMHO.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roberto Fico 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

La foto di Lorenzo Bini Smaghi caricata è di Max Rossi /Reuters e di proprietà dell'Agenzia Contrasto, che l'ha ceduta al Dr. Bini Smaghi per uso nel suo sito www.lorenzobinismaghi.com, http://www.lorenzobinismaghi.com/images/Foto-LBS/Reuters%205.JPG e per uso su Wikipedia. Per cortesia fatemi sapere come inseire il giusto copyright prima che venga cancellata di nuovo. Avevo inserito Attribution ma a quanto pare non basta! Grazie mille

The photo of Lorenzo Bini Smaghi inserted has been made by Max Rossi/Reuters and it is property of the Agency Contrasto, who gave the rights to Mr Bini Smaghi for his website www.lorenzobinismaghi.com http://www.lorenzobinismaghi.com/images/Foto-LBS/Reuters%205.JPG and for Wikipedia. Please kindly let me know how to amend the copyright, before you delete it again. I had inserted the tag "Attribution" but apparently it is not enough. Thanks a lot Kind regards

I'm the owner of Ubuntulife.co.za (please check "whois" to confirm). I uploaded and published that image to my website first and only uploaded it to Wikimedia today. This image is my own work and should not have been deleted. Also, it took you just a minute or two to delete my image after I uploaded it but a couple of hours after I requested it to be undeleted, you still haven't responded. I have several more images that I'm planning to upload but it's pointless since you'll probably just delete them anyway without consideration.

I see you deleted the picture of Hot Thespian Action that I added today, apparently because it's elsewhere on the web? As I carefully detailed while uploading it, I am the copyright holder and give permission to use it. How do I protect it from being erroneously deleted again?

Ciao Jaqen mi scuso per la violazione di copyright ma non ho ben capito come inserire immagini su Wikipedia. Dove posso prenderle se non su un motore di ricerca o su siti Internet? Come bisogna fare? Attendo risposta... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelangelomaiellaro (talk • contribs) 11:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Ciao Jaqen, , buongiorno. ti scrivo perché avrei bisogno di informazioni sulla costituzione di una nuova pagina Wiki.. mi sono iscritto a wikipedia di recente in quanto preposto dal gruppo Odd Fellow italiano di creare la ns pagina wekepedia (https://www.facebook.com/Odd-Fellows-Italia-381535755310715/) Non so come sia successo, ma qualcuno mi ci ha cancellato tutto il lavoro che avevamo svolto (gli Odd Fellow in Italia) Premetto che tutte le immagini inserite (3) erano possedute con il consenso dei creatori (tutti legati all'ordine Odd Fellow tra Italia e svizzera) la domanda è, come possiamo redigere nuovamente un testo ed ambire ad essere pubblicati su Wikipedia senza incappare in altri incidenti di questo tipo? cosa stiamo sbagliando? perdona ma non siamo pratici

ti ringrazio molto Claudio Giorla

Caro Jaqen, una ex collega che lavora in Regione Toscana mi segnala che questo utente User:Ralf Roletschek ha chieso un risarcimento alla Regione Toscana per uso improprio di una sua foto nel servizio BiblioToscana (catalogo delle iblioteche toscane) Vedi questa pagina https://biblio.toscana.it/argomento/Graz da cui ora è sparita la foto. La Regione in effetti a fondo del sito scrive : Copyright © BIBLIOTOSCANA: tutti i diritti riservati quanto ai dati delle risorse. I contenuti estratti da Wikipedia sono riproducibili con licenza CCO 1.0 Universal. sbagliando a scrivere CC0 con CC BY SA. Ma ti pare legittimo chiedere un risarcimento? Ciao Susanna Giaccai (talk) 16:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Carolyn Wirth - I Read Emily Dickinson All Last Winter.jpg questo è una violazione di copyright in quanto opera di autore vivente senza autorizzazione, ma è in cancellazione ordinaria, che si fa si aspetta o si può segnalare per cancellazione immediata? Che i cieli ti siano sempre blu :) Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Grazie mille ma visto non mi hai detto cosa fare la prossima volta, la prossima volta non rispetterò l’usuale rotazione Blc Jaq Ruth ma ti riscrivo :) ••Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Nathan_Dawe has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Euro know (talk) 07:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Ciao Jaqen, non trovo più l'opzione per caricare più elementi in un solo file. Come posso fare?--Potenza2021 (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Sono da smartphone Android.--Potenza2021 (talk) 13:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Ti ringrazio, purtroppo in questo momento mi è impossibile.--Potenza2021 (talk) 14:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lucio Parrillo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Skimel (talk) 17:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Ciao, ti vorrei chiedere un parere: è possibile caricare qui il ritaglio di un volto tratto da un video fatto in una occasione pubblica e trovato in YouTube? metto come creatrice me stessa? o altro? ciao Susanna Giaccai (talk) 13:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

ciao Jaqen, ma il file che tu mi indichi come esempio ha la licenza CC BY NC SA, quella adottata dal Comune di Napoli per i suoi file in YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@comunenapoli/about . Essando Non commerciale non si potrebbe mettere in Commons, o mi sbaglio? Susanna Giaccai (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shinji Hashimoto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --J. Lunau (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teresa Mannino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sergio Rizzo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red Ronnie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:44, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vera Gheno.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Italian-American communities observe 12th anniversary of 9-11 - 9772367152.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Adesso ho messo il collegamento al permesso da parte dell'autore, si può rimuovere l'avviso che minaccia la cancellazione del file? Osservatore storico (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Buonasera, Jaqen. Ti rispondo direttamente in italiano per (reciproca) comodità, ma se necessario posso anche intervenire in inglese nella richiesta di cancellazione. Secondo te, sarebbe fattibile come soluzione di compromesso se sostituissi all'interno del collage la foto "incriminata" con quella di un'altra personalità hāfu (ad esempio questa) e lo ricaricassi "ex novo" con un altro nome, lasciando sopprimere direttamente ad un admin "commonaro" quello vecchio? Fammi sapere. Saluti. Mess (talk) 21:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done Ho caricato la nuova versione del file (aggiornando di conseguenza la sua descrizione e le altre informazioni collaterali). Può bastare o devo comunque comunicarlo anche nella PdC? Saluti. --Mess (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

You unintentionally participated in vandalism on the main page today, see the history of Template:Potd/2023-09-09 (en). Multichill (talk) 21:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gianluca Costantini - Lucca 2017.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Lutheraner (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

@Lutheraner I removed the template since I took the photo, I just prefer the attribution to be given to my name instead that to my username (my name in the author field is a wikilink to my user page, so I thought it to be clear). Jaqen (talk) 16:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

_{(English version available here)}

Ciao Jaqen, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Hi. Maybe you can clarify something as an Italian administrator, but according to at least one person in the DR (Friniate) the agreements between WLMI and the government of Italy are non-copyright agreements. Assuming that's the case wouldn't it then mean the images could still be deleted on the grounds that they violate copyright since the agreements have nothing to do with it? Or am I just understanding the whole thing wrong? Adamant1 (talk) 18:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roberto Weber.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used.--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)