User talk:FotothekBot
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
File:Fotothek df rp-a 0010022 Hochkirch-Rodewitz. Windmühle und Gehöft, Aquarell, 1945-46, Malerin aus Lettlan.jpg
[edit]File:Fotothek df rp-a 0010022 Hochkirch-Rodewitz. Windmühle und Gehöft, Aquarell, 1945-46, Malerin aus Lettlan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Polarlys (talk) 10:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 13:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Fotothek df tg 0007540 Geometrie ^ Vermessung ^ Vermessungsinstrument ^ Messrute ^ Rute ^ Landwirtschaf.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df rp-d 0410030 Ralbitz-Rosenthal-Cunnewitz. Klosterwasser unweit der Mühle mit Wehr.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df tg 0007541 Geometrie ^ Vermessung ^ Vermessungsinstrument ^ Messrute ^ Rute ^ Landwirtschaf.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df tg 0007539 Geometrie ^ Vermessung ^ Vermessungsinstrument ^ Rute ^ Messrute ^ Landwirtschaf.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df rp-j 0080028 Oberreit, Sect. Elsterberg, 1850-52.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df rp-a 0470041 Pirna-Liebethal. Bauinschrift, datiert 1849 mit Mühlstein an einem Haus.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df rp-a 0270028 Königstein-Sächs. Schweiz. Festung und Stadt, aus- Schiffner 1840.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df n-09 0000319.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df rp-c 0840048 Bad Muskau-Köbeln. Papierfabrik, Firmenzeichen OFM.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df n-11 0001184.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df rp-a 0300021 Zörbig. Ortsansicht mit Bockmühlen, aus, Wilhelm Dilichs Federzeichnungen kursäc.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fotothek df n-07 0000045.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
File:Fotothek_df_ps_0006319_Rathäuser.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B80 (talk) 22:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Fotothek_df_rp-c_0710041_Dresden-Langebrück._Oberreit,_Sect._Dresden,_1821-22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
87.170.178.203 09:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df pk 0000303 037 Pfingsten 1947.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
IIVeaa (talk) 23:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Fotothek_df_roe-neg_0006714_013_Portrait_einer_Frau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.184.50.68 11:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Fotothek df rp-c 0370034 Wilsdruff-Limbach. Meßtischblatt^ Sekt. ^, 1880.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Wie soll der angebliche Urheber die Karte schon 1880 gemacht haben, wenn er erst 1933 geboren wurde?
Saibo (Δ) 22:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df rp-c 0370034 Wilsdruff-Limbach. Meßtischblatt^ Sekt. ^, 1880.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 13:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Fotothek-df ge 0000373-Sponsor wirbt am Dogenpalast.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006560 027 Kopf und Vorderkörper einer Katze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kulmalukko (talk) 22:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 23:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Fotothek df ps 0004488 Brunnen ^ Brunnenanlagen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df ld 0003094 001a Ausstellungen ^ Ausstellungsgebäude ^ Brunnen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df ld 0003094 001b Ausstellungen ^ Ausstellungsgebäude ^ Brunnen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df ld 0003094 001c Brunnen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df ps 0004477 Ausstellungen ^ Ausstellungsgebäude ^ Brunnen.jpg
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 09:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006383 026 Blick in eine Straße mit einem Opel P4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.64.145.109 17:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006383 027 Opel P4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.64.145.109 17:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df rp-d 0920001 Ruhland-Arnsdorf. Ehem. Hammermühle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.185.250.15 15:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df rp-d 0920003 Ruhland-Arnsdorf. Ehem. Hammermühle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.185.250.15 15:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df rp-d 0920005 Ruhland-Arnsdorf. Ehem. Hammermühle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.185.250.15 15:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df rp-d 0920007 Ruhland-Arnsdorf. Ehem. Hammermühle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.185.250.15 15:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df rp-d 0920001 Ruhland-Arnsdorf. Ehem. Hammermühle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
79.238.238.140 09:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df rp-d 0920001 Ruhland-Arnsdorf. Ehem. Hammermühle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.185.246.177 20:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Fotothek df n-30 0000552 Farbglas Mahnmal Sachsenhausen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df n-30 0000553 Farbglas Mahnmal Sachsenhausen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df n-30 0000554 Farbglas Mahnmal Sachsenhausen.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dresden, Ruine der Frauenkirche, Fotothek df pk 0000259 009.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dresden, Ruine der Frauenkirche, Fotothek df pk 0000259 009.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Dresden, Ruine der Frauenkirche, Fotothek df pk 0000259 009.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 16:29, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 005.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 005.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 005.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 006.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 006.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 006.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 007.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 007.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Fotothek df pk 0000259 007.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Danke :)
[edit]Für die schönen Bilder, eine wahrliche Bereicherung. Beste Grüße, Conny (talk) 06:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC).
File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006468 034 Plakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 00:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006072 036 Propaganda-Plakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 00:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006072 036 Propaganda-Plakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006279 025 Sichtwerbung für das IV. Parlament der FDJ am Ge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006279 026 Sichtwerbung für das IV. Parlament der FDJ am Ge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |