User talk:Eisenacher~commonswiki
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Yann 19:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Picture of the Year contest
[edit]Hello. Thank you for your interest in the 2006 Picture of the Year contest. To vote, you must be an established Wiki editor with at least 100 edits registered either on your Commons or on your home wiki account (eg on one of the Wikipedia sites). You don't have 100 edits on your Commons account, but if you do on your home wiki, please add a diff pointing to a statement on your home wiki talk page which confirms your identity. For example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABryan_Tong_Minh&diff=103243817&oldid=100712171 diff] which appears as diff. You should add this diff on the same line as your vote, at Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 1. Thank you! If you have any questions, you can ask at Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2006. Alvesgaspar 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Warwick Vase Medaille.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-- Prince Kassad 15:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Luise_Joseph_Grassi_1802_min.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
[[ Forrester ]] 17:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Bad use of categories
[edit]Hello,
thanks for your images. Please note that your current use of categories does not work at all. The categories should not be put inside the information template, but at the end of the file description, see for instance the correction I made to File:Koellnischer Park Berlin Lapidarium 1.jpg. Please note also that categories should be in English.
I guess that all your uploads have to be corrected, by putting the categories at the end of the file. You may ask a bot to do this..
Frédéric (talk) 19:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Fehlende Kategorie
[edit]Hallo Eisenacher, Deine schöne Datei File:Ansicht Saechsische Schweiz um 1850.jpg hat noch keine Kats - so ganz auf die Schnelle weiß ich auch nicht, wohin damit, seltsam. Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
jetzt ist es verarztet - ist ja alles auf englisch Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
...in diesem Fall denn doch nicht alles --Eisenacher (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
klar, das fehlte noch, tolle ansicht, muss ich mal hin Cholo Aleman (talk) 16:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
dito: File:Ansicht Frankfurt Oder um 1850.jpg - grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 03:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
== [[:File:Plakat Heine - Simplicissimus 189 6.jpg]] ==
[[:File:Plakat Heine - Simplicissimus 189
6.jpg]] has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plakat Heine - Simplicissimus 189
6.jpg|its entry]]. |
195.93.60.10 21:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
snake images
[edit]which species are these two snakes?
TCO (talk) 03:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Schuebler Sommerhaus.jpg was uncategorized on 24 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Schuebler Himmelbett.jpg was uncategorized on 24 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Schuebler Studierzimmer.jpg was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Schuebler Synopsis Titelblatt.jpg was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Schuebler Stuben-Ofen.jpg was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Schuebler Synopsis Tafel 10.jpg was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Samuel Roesel 3.jpg was uncategorized on 17 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Samuel Roesel 1.jpg was uncategorized on 17 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Samuel Roesel 2.jpg was uncategorized on 17 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Keramik-Museum Berlin.jpg was uncategorized on 17 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:AltMuseum 1b.jpg was uncategorized on 11 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Lorenz Schwietz um 1890.jpg was uncategorized on 19 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Bitte nicht überkategorisieren!
[edit]Hallo Eisenacher, bitte überkategorisiere deine Bilder nicht. Beispiel: File:Schaper Goethe 1880, Statue.jpg
- category:Fritz Schaper: überkategorisiert und nicht i.O., da schon Elternkategorie von category:Goethe memorial (Berlin-Tiergarten).
- category:Memorials in Großer Tiergarten: überkategorisiert und nicht i.O., da schon Elternkategorie von category:Goethe memorial (Berlin-Tiergarten).
- category:Statues in Berlin-Tiergarten: überkategorisiert und nicht i.O., da schon Elternkategorie von category:Goethe memorial (Berlin-Tiergarten).
- category:Goethe memorial (Berlin-Tiergarten): i.O.
- category:Statues of Goethe: überkategorisiert und nicht i.O., da schon Elternkategorie von category:Goethe memorial (Berlin-Tiergarten).
- category:Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: überkategorisiert und nicht i.O., da schon Elternkategorie von category:Statues of Goethe.
Weitere Hinweise gibt es bei Commons:Categories. -- Ies (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Eisenacher~commonswiki,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Plakat Cappiello - Maurin Quina 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
howcheng {chat} 20:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venet, Arc de 124,5°, Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Tieck Wackenroder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FA2010 (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Sehr geehrter Manfred Brückels, wir sind auf der Suche nach einem Titelmotiv für eine unsere Tagung auf Ihr Foto gestoßen und hätten nun zum einem die Frage, ob wir auch einen Ausschnitt daraus für z. B. für ein Plakat verwenden dürfen und gleichzeitig, ob Sie ggf. das Bild noch in einer höheren Auflösung zu Verfügung stellen könnten. Sie erreichen mich über meine Benutzerseite oder über unsere Website. Mit besten Grüßen --ReaDas (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze
[edit]Hallo Eisenacher,
in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.
Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.
In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.
Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.
Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.
( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Eisenacher. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Eisenacher~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
20:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
02:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pei Berlin 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Plakat Bernhard - Plakatfreunde 08.jpg
- File:Plakat Bernhard - Priester 06.jpg
- File:Plakat Bernhard 08.jpg
Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 15:47, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Luise Apotheose Schadow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mutter Erde (talk) 09:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Pfaueninsel
[edit]Hallo Eisenacher, hättest Du die Möglichkeit, diese Karte in einer höheren Auflösung einzuscannen? In der vorliegenden Version sind die Beschriftungen auf der Karte praktisch nicht mehr lesbar. Viele Grüße,--Ratzer (talk) 07:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Tieranatomisches Theater Berlin innen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Daniel Mietchen (talk) 15:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Kuntzsch Sassnitz 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |