User talk:David Liuzzo

Soft redirect page

:de:Benutzer Diskussion:David Liuzzo

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar

Bonjour ! N'ayant pas trouvé d'autre moyen de communication que celui-ci, je me permets de vous écrire suite à vos créations sur la page ; http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A9raldique_fran%C3%A7aise Je demande votre autorisation d'utiliser et dériver vos créations comme le spécifie le Wikimedia Commons. Cette utilisation se ferrait autour du jeu en ligne "lesroyaumes.com", un jeu role-play en ligne pré-renaissance. J'espère obtenir une réponse de votre part afin de pouvoir profiter pleinement de vos productions. Cordialement, A. [Vous pouvez me répondre à cdrvois@outlook.com] Arcadhias (talk) 15:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'd wish to use your file for a personal project outside Wikimedia/Wikipedia. This derivative work will be (or I least I think it will) under the CC NC-BY license. Please reply letting me know your opinion, etc. --MrPotato1010 (talk) 19:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as licensing says, just put the name somewhere.

Hallo David, wir würden gerne Teile deiner Darstellung des Wappens des Deutschen Bundes für ein Logo nutzen, wobei eine Namensnennung leider unpassend wäre. Könntest du bezüglich dieser Sache bitte Kontakt per E-Mail mit uns aufnehmen? (sascha.huemmer(at)wld-gmbh.de). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sascha Hümmer (talk • contribs) 08:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo David, zum 100 Jährigen des Versailler Vertrags gestalten wir ein Projekt zusammen mit allen Gemeinden rund um die ehemalige Grenze Belgien - Preußen. Das Projekt ist nicht kommerziell, es wird uns eher noch Geld kosten. Es läuft bis Mai 2020. Ich entwickle ein Logo, dass aus den Wappen der drei Staaten (Belgien, Preußen und Neutral-Moresnet) besteht. Wärst Du mit einer Nutzung einverstanden. Es ist leider nicht möglich, den Autor zu vermerken. Vielen Dank für Deine Antwort. --LeFagnard (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte mal melden, vlt. kann ich hierzu was 'besseres' beisteuern: david@liuzzo.de --David Liuzzo (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imperial Crown of Napoleon.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Deutsches Reich (Weimarer Republik).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.56.58.56 14:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich halte die Löschung für falsch, weil der Adler sehr gut gestaltet wurde und einen historischen Wert besitzt. Außerdem vergibt der Urheber die vollkommenen Nutzungsrechte. Ich bin von Beruf studierter Kommunikationsdesigner und kann das durchaus einschätzen. 2A02:908:A64:AEA0:89E0:1C5B:2AEA:5B2A 11:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Erzbistum Mechelen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Brookford (talk) 20:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Hildesheim.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:908:2A43:BBC0:BD9C:D8AF:9EAD:5A0 18:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'd like to use your 1803-1892 flag of Prussia for a personal project outside wikipedia. Baconheimian (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Erzbistum Mechelen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Brookford (talk) 03:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'd like to know the full copyright status of your file so I can attribute it properly for a derivative work outside Wikimedia/Wikipedia. Hoping for you response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Occvltvs (talk • contribs) 16:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Gerard Ströhl has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

R'n'B (talk) 15:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to ask you for vectorization (SVG format) of the linked (referenced) image with the coat of arms of Moravia. Best regards.--Pavel Fric (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo David, danke für deine sehr schöne Digitalisierung des Nürnberger Stadtwappens. Darf ich es in meinem privaten, nichtkommerziellen Weblog unter www.lexikaliker.de zeigen? Das wäre prima. Danke für deine Antwort! Gruß, Gunther (schmidt(a)stdk.de) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunther Schmidt (talk • contribs) 14:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David Liuzzo, My husband has his Genealogy business and we would like create products with the following image.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Kingdom_of_Prussia_(1803-1892).svg#file

We would like to create physical products like mugs, shirt, pillow, etc. What do we have to do in order to use the picture? I read all the information related to license and looks like that we have to contact you directly. Also we will need those pictures in a high quality image format. Thanks for your help. Isabel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isabel Wendt (talk • contribs) 01:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @David Liuzzo:

I request you to please create SVG vector images of insignia of Indian Army's regiments. If you wish to do so here is the list of insignia -

• Assam Regiment
• Bihar Regiment
• Brigade of the Guards
• Dogra Regiment
• Garhwal Rifles
• Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry
• Jammu and Kashmir Rifles
• Jat Regiment
• Kumaon Regiment
• Madras Regiment
• Mahar Regiment
• Maratha Regiment
• Mechanised Infantry Regiment
• Naga Regiment
• Punjab Regiment
• Rajputana Rifles
• Rajput Regiment
• Sikh Light Infantry
• Sikh Regiment
• The Grenadiers

Thanks and hope you will respond.

Regards Soap Boy 1 (talk) 10:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Could you update the Bundesrat map? North Rhine-Westphalia and Schleswig-Holstein now both have a CDU-Greens government. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landesregierung_(Deutschland)#/media/Datei:Zusammensetzung_des_deutschen_Bundesrates.svg Clepto86 (talk) 16:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make it. --David Liuzzo (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what's the source for that coat of arms? Kazachstanski nygus (talk) 16:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Bistum Paderborn.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Original research) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Revolution Yes.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 01:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo David, müßte Marienbad in der Karte https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Verwaltungsgliederung_des_Königreichs_Böhmen_1893.svg nicht im Bezirk Tepl anstatt im Bezirk Plan eingezeichnet sein? Vergleiche z.B. mit https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/General-Post_und_Straßen-Karte_des_Konigreichs_Böhmen_1889.jpg Oberschwabe01 (talk) 10:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Bistum Chur.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kommunikation, Bistum Chur (talk) 14:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Bistum Chur.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kommunikation, Bistum Chur (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am reaching out on behalf of my father; he would like to use the referenced Prussian Eagle in a project outside of Wiki: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Kingdom_of_Prussia_(1803-1892).svg 2601:C2:1F80:9910:C0C3:7D0A:E48C:2682 20:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:5-DM-Coin-German (back).jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]